My pictures are from TrekCore. Accept no substitutes. Yeah, I’m done with this one.
ignore real screencaps all you want - that doesn't change the facts. you can of course personally see pre-vfx production photos as more truthful as the final canon on-screen look, just as you can choose to ignore strong color differences in the rest of the intro and use only one part of it as an argument, just as you can ignore what production people say. but that doesn't change that the episode you wrote i should watch simply does not support what you wrote. just follow your own suggestion and watch the episode, or even just that scene, and pay attention to the crystal color. it really is very obviously green.My pictures are from TrekCore. Accept no substitutes. Yeah, I’m done with this one.
Linus' trouble with the new badge kinda addressed that really well with minimum effort or timeIt would have been interesting to dedicate an episode to the Disco crew feeling all fish-out-of-water, coming up to speed on eight centuries of missing history, learning to cope with changes in culture / tech, and building up relationships with guys from current Starfleet (who would be just as fascinated about Discovery, her crew and the living history that represents) but they'd have to generate a meaningful story to hang that around.
More people are talking about DSC than they are ENT and probably ever have. It must be doing something right if it's getting more press and attention good or bad than the previous series.
DSC will have a legacy because it's reaching for a new audience on a never-before-attempted platform for the franchise. Whether it goes down as one of the best in Trek or down near the bottom it already has a voice and people care about it. You don't have to like it but saying it "won't have a legacy" is just ridiculous.
What an absolutely ludicrous and arbitrary goal post.When Burnham action figures start to sell as well as Kirk and spock figures let me know. Until then this show is at the bottom .
Really? What are you doing? If this is the best you've got, then please let someone else bash the show.When Burnham action figures start to sell as well as Kirk and spock figures let me know. Until then this show is at the bottom .
Really? What are you doing? If this is the best you've got, then please let someone else bash the show.
I'm having flashbacks. To talking about DS9 on this very board. In 1999 and 2000. Unlike you, I don't equate popularity with quality. Otherwise, Baywatch and Two-and-a-Half Men are the best shows ever. I don't give a shit about what other people watch. I only give a shit about what I watch. And, once again unlike you, I only watch what I like.Burnham will never be some a household sci fi name like Kirk. It won’t happen. The show is just just not that popular.
I take that back. It can make threads really confusing.The ignore function is bliss.
I stopped buying toys and playing with toys when I was 11. But when it comes to the Fandom Menace, hey, I'm not here to judge.I find the Fandom Menace's attention to toys and memorandum to be a strange obsession. It's almost as if they want people to see the wall of stuff behind them as proof of their fandom.
Sorry if it seems that I am dismissing those who do like memorabilia--I just put in an order with Eaglemoss for my son, and I love Star Trek tabletop games--but I suspect their equation of toys with quality is some sort of tell.I stopped buying toys and playing with toys when I was 11. But when it comes to the Fandom Menace, hey, I'm not here to judge.![]()
Burnham will never be some a household sci fi name like Kirk. It won’t happen. The show is just just not that popular.
you said that in a couple of decades the people that doesn’t like discovery now will like it while hating the new series, but on this very forum we have people not liking enterprise or Voyager back then and still not liking it now.Where did i claim discovery would be or should be different? My point is that people can develop a new appreciation for things they once didn't like. I didn't like enterprise when it first aired but now i think there is some really good storytelling going on particularly season 3 and 4.
i don’t remember the de-evolving episode, but the beauty and the beast one was baaaad.There are two episodes of season three that Brannon Braga hated particularly, he doesn't (in the interview) even remember them correctly, he refers to one as "That de-evolving episode" and the other as "That beauty and the beast episode", my guess is that he didn't have much to do with either.![]()
yeah, that definitely never happens. And she definitely never cries after killing people doing her job after she has stolen her dilithium, that was somehow totally fine.Burnham goes on a killing spree,
well, the original argument uptrend was that discovery was more popular than TOS...Frankly TOS Era-based merchandise is the most successful in Trek history. If we base a series' legacy on how well its action figures sell then frankly none of them would have the legacy of TOS.
They do. As much as I love DS9 the vast majority of people don’t remember anything about it.Sisko's not a household name, either. Nor Janeway. Nor Archer.
By that standard only Kirk and Picard qualify as "popular" and having a "legacy."
...in the mirror universe?Kirk is not a household name at least not the one played by Shatner who is no doubt the kirk you are referring to. A majority of the general public will know the Kirk played by Chris Pine, because Chris Pine is hot and graces the covers of magazines. Shatner is now a washed up has been that can only get attention by being an idiot on twitter.
Linus' trouble with the new badge kinda addressed that really well with minimum effort or time![]()
...
i don’t remember the de-evolving episode...
....
I hope the reaction to Unification III doesn't alter this show's plans to go ahead with Threshold II, These Are the Voyages II and Spock's Brain II.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.