From the first episode of this season, the Burn has been presented as the "big mystery" of the season. It's clearly the driving force of Michael's character arc in particular. She seems assured that solving the mystery of the Burn is necessary to restore the Federation.
The only problem is, there's nothing other than Burnham's word here to rely upon. It happened a century ago, and all of the major powers (to the extent they still exist) seem to have moved on. The Burn happened once, and didn't ever repeat. The little remaining dilithium seems to work just fine. Everything is more crapsack, and there are low-level crises going on, but nothing major. We haven't even gotten to see any "prologue" shots which might establish to us as the viewers there is a threat independent of the knowledge that Michael has. We're essentially taking it at her word that this is a Big Deal.
The way the season arc is constructed so far is very, very similar to Season 2. There is a big mystery. Each week the crew has a semi-episodic adventure which uncovers a piece of a MacGuffin needed to open the mystery box. The fact that it's so similar makes me think that it's impossible that the writing team - which is mostly identical to the team at the end of Season 2 - intend to draw to a similar conclusion.
One of the major structural differences between the two is that in Season 2, we were both shown and told that the Red Angel/signals were a big effin deal. Here, Michael just tells us they're a big deal. And while last season was still somewhat uncritical regarding Michael, here the show is being much more explicit in Michael's flaws - her "responsibility hoarding" - her monomania, etc.
The conclusion I draw is - if the season is well written - the mystery of the Burn will offer no closure, and not save the Federation at all. It's going to be really deflating to Michael. She was looking for one quick fix for what was wrong with the 32nd century, when what's needed instead is the hard work of slowly rebuilding the Federation relationship by relationship. The seasonal arc is thus meant to be a personal arc for Michael - a reflection/critique on her character, not a tired "Michael saves the galaxy - again!"
Of course, I may be wrong, and they may go somewhere else entirely. But if they choose to go this route, I will be very much impressed.
The only problem is, there's nothing other than Burnham's word here to rely upon. It happened a century ago, and all of the major powers (to the extent they still exist) seem to have moved on. The Burn happened once, and didn't ever repeat. The little remaining dilithium seems to work just fine. Everything is more crapsack, and there are low-level crises going on, but nothing major. We haven't even gotten to see any "prologue" shots which might establish to us as the viewers there is a threat independent of the knowledge that Michael has. We're essentially taking it at her word that this is a Big Deal.
The way the season arc is constructed so far is very, very similar to Season 2. There is a big mystery. Each week the crew has a semi-episodic adventure which uncovers a piece of a MacGuffin needed to open the mystery box. The fact that it's so similar makes me think that it's impossible that the writing team - which is mostly identical to the team at the end of Season 2 - intend to draw to a similar conclusion.
One of the major structural differences between the two is that in Season 2, we were both shown and told that the Red Angel/signals were a big effin deal. Here, Michael just tells us they're a big deal. And while last season was still somewhat uncritical regarding Michael, here the show is being much more explicit in Michael's flaws - her "responsibility hoarding" - her monomania, etc.
The conclusion I draw is - if the season is well written - the mystery of the Burn will offer no closure, and not save the Federation at all. It's going to be really deflating to Michael. She was looking for one quick fix for what was wrong with the 32nd century, when what's needed instead is the hard work of slowly rebuilding the Federation relationship by relationship. The seasonal arc is thus meant to be a personal arc for Michael - a reflection/critique on her character, not a tired "Michael saves the galaxy - again!"
Of course, I may be wrong, and they may go somewhere else entirely. But if they choose to go this route, I will be very much impressed.