The pantsless uniforms will destroy the franchise.Wait until the Cooleddie Era of Trek begins.
Then all you sorry people will be in for it...
Spoilers Robert Meyer Burnett: "Terra Firma" will ruin Trek canon
- Thread starter Romulan_spy
- Start date
- Status
Doesn’t bother me a bit @cooleddie74! My Odo Era of Trek will retcon your Cooleddie era to reveal that every character was a figment of Odo’s imagination.
Check and mate.
Check and mate.
Last edited:
Care to tell me where to find that? I've been around enough Trek forums to know for the past decade to know that "fair" is all in the eye of the beholder.
I take it you haven't been run out of town yet, then? Because, honestly if people don't regard DSC in continuity then that's no problem for me. I simply find it interesting to try and discuss the show in light of other Trek but hey we make it work.
Boringham? Childish remark that is difficult to take seriously, like Jar Jar Abrams. It's stupid name calling to my mind, and not a fair discussion.
But, thus far, it seems people still post them so we seem to be OK.
People who use terms like STD, Boringham, and Not Prime are not using criticism. QED
Not just pantsless. Possibly hairless.
Go on....
Most of the complaints tend to boil down to it’s different than a show made in the 60s and shows made in the 80s up to the 00s. If you can’t handle that then don’t watch it.
good. that makes the tricorders look bigger
"I hope that's a handheld sensor or you're gonna have an awkward first date!"
Enough to keep watching this thread and posting in itOh, we’re still talking about this?
I don't watch the 'what's the weather' or 'random thoughts' threads, star wars subforum, and stuff like that, and I quickly unwatch threads that I don't care about anymore. That's far better than reminding people in those threads how much I don't care about what they care about.
Please post them with spoiler tags, I'm curious.
Is TOS obsolete cause Kirk dies in GEN? And the Federation didn't fall, and wasn't thrown out. Perhaps you should watch things before you criticize them XD
That's the key. I think most of our differences on this board and in the whole fandom are only about the degree to which it should be respected or bent.
Nope.
Yes.
everyone working from TNG to Enterprise all made their mark while staying generally consistant and without fucking over the franchise. Why does kurtzman get to just radically destroy everything and get a pass for it? If Voyager had introduced Klingons that look like shit and then destroyed the Federation, Bremen and Braga would have been thrown off the top of a building by a mob. But kurtzman, the guy who is the dictionary definition of failing upward in Hollywood, gets praised for doing it.
Everyone likes what they like, but it comes off as some kind of cult thinking with the people that praise kurtzman's original series that stole the Star Trek name
Does he? I doubt it, based on his approach to the material from way back in 2007-2009. His interest in the franchise seems largely managerial and oriented toward career building - he's a younger, far more social media-savvy Rick Berman. He may have served as an emergency line producer on one of his own shows for a while when things fell apart mid-stream, but generally he employs creators - plural - in the form of writers, producers and designers who really appear to have a lot of room to move in the directions they take. He keeps the whole thing on course, and the CBS executives happy.
Stole what now? What the hell as Kurtzman done to Trek's name beyond expand it to people who don't want to watch other Trek series? Seriously? I have heard this argument since Abrams' Trek and still makes zero sense. Star Trek didn't stop being Star Trek because Kurtzman went a different direction.
Nothing has been destroyed.
You've been around here long enough that you ought to know what is wrong with this statement, as well as the avalanche of responses that will follow, no?
That it is nonsensical whilst being inflammatory?
Just as much as my statement was measured but condescending.
[...] it might have been a better show. Or at least a watchable one, which in the case of VOY still means better.
At least they would have done something creative, original, new and would have not been that tired shitshow for seven years
- Status