I take a middle road--use moderation in the actual show, but include as much detail as possible in the technical manuals.
Same here - I enjoy finding out how and why things work, fictional or not.For me, as somebody who is technical IRL, once I understood how the internal tech worked along with reading the expanded technical manuals and watching it line up with the Technobabble for the most part, it added to the sense of "Realism" to the technology of the world.
And when I speak to people IRL about subject specific matter, we do use technical terms that most normies wouldn't understand, so there is realism in that aspect depending on subject matter.
It's simply more niche. Even with Star Wars there is a different feel to how merchandising is done, and the books as well.Sadly, there don't seem to be as many tech manuals as there were like, say, back in the 90's, either official or fan-made. IIRC, they historically didn't do well in sales, so the incentive dried up. You'd think they'd be all over the place now, especially since there were only 2 or 3 shows back then, and there are now 8 in active production/pre-production. Mech & Tech just doesn't seem to sell as well as it used to for some reason anymore.![]()
![]()
The "Star Trek Technical Manual" (first published circa 1975) covers the 23rd century. "Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise" the TOS feature film era; and the TNG Technical Manual covers everything in the 24th century era (which all three Berman era shows occur in).Sadly, there don't seem to be as many tech manuals as there were like, say, back in the 90's, either official or fan-made. IIRC, they historically didn't do well in sales, so the incentive dried up. You'd think they'd be all over the place now, especially since there were only 2 or 3 shows back then, and there are now 8 in active production/pre-production. Mech & Tech just doesn't seem to sell as well as it used to for some reason anymore.![]()
![]()
About that four-nacelled Starfleet ship which didn't have any pylons (i.e. the nacelles appeared to 'float')...I noticed the EDF ships from "People of Earth" were also like that.
I wonder what keeps the nacelles from drifting away? And why it's considered 'safe' to not have them permanently attached?
^ I suppose a nacelle pylon that doesn't "exist" can't be shot away...so whatever is keeping the nacelles in place must be safe from enemy fire.
Interesting loophole around the Treaty of Algeron!Maybe they partially "Phase Cloaked" the pylons so that they appear to float but are really connected.
So if you shoot at the pylons, all shots would just pass through the pylons.
It's one way to use "Cloaking" without actually hiding your ship.Interesting loophole around the Treaty of Algeron!
Phasing for Algeron.Interesting loophole around the Treaty of Algeron!![]()
Interesting loophole around the Treaty of Algeron!![]()
Would the Treaty of Algeron still apply in the 32nd century?
Perhaps the nacelles can jump away briefly to evade attacks XD^ I suppose a nacelle pylon that doesn't "exist" can't be shot away...so whatever is keeping the nacelles in place must be safe from enemy fire.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.