That's a lie.
Hope Hicks, Donald & Melania Trump Contract COVID
- Thread starter TheMadCloner
- Start date
They don’t care, as long as they’re protecting Cheeto Mussolini.
"Virulent hatred" is a hell of an ironic choice of words when he's actually infecting members of the press with a virus.
Are the Secret Service and White House staff part of the cabal of Trump haters reporting basic facts that are plainly in evidence for anyone who wants to see them as well?
What about all these Fox News execs, pundits, and reporters who have to get tested because of Trump's irresponsible behavior? Are they Trump haters too?
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...e-tested-after-potential-covid-19-exposure-at
Top executives and anchors for Fox Corp. and Fox News will reportedly receive COVID-19 tests after potential exposure at the presidential debate on Tuesday, two days before President Trump tested positive for coronavirus.
The New York Times reported on Friday that among those who attended the debate included Lachlan Murdoch, executive chairman of the Fox Corporation; Fox News Media CEO Suzanne Scott; President Jay Wallace; and Fox News anchors including Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum.
"Fox News Sunday" anchor Chris Wallace moderated the 90-minute event. He told "Fox & Friends" on Friday that he was always about 10-12 feet from the two candidates but will still get tested.
Other Fox News broadcasters in Cleveland included Sean Hannity, who conducted an on-set interview with Donald Trump Jr. after the debate, Brit Hume, Dana Perino, Juan Williams, Bill Hemmer and Karl Rove, who was the top strategist for former President George W. Bush.
There's no proof of that. It may be fake news.
It isn't "virulent hatred" to call a spade a spade.
Edit: Didn't you say you were done with this conversation? I guess you just couldn't help yourself.
First off, I wasn't even talking about Dr. Fauci, which I made quite explicit. I was talking about the head of the CDC, Dr. Robert Redfield, and the Surgeon General, Dr. Adams. Both Trump appointees. And I didn't say not to believe them at all, as most of the time what they have to say is perfectly fine. I said to treat their individual remarks with more skepticism than you would international scientific consensus as their messaging is more directly under Trump's influence. Hell, even Fauci was somewhat under Trump's influence on messaging when he took the lead and Trump started contradicting him, so it's always better to look at the scientific consensus than any one person.
No, they haven't. They have adapted as they've learned. Which is what you're supposed to do. Sticking with the same course of action in light of new evidence is how you wind up with half the administration being infected.
Of course he's not the sole person responsible. But he's by far the biggest. And he hasn't handled it better in than any other free world leader or country TODAY, much less in the past. There are going to be more people infected in the White House this week than in entire countries, all because of his irresponsible behavior.
And don't even go there with the Creepy Joe shit in comparison to Trump, because you're just opening up a can of worms.
Uh huh. See you tomorrow.
One point of clarification: While Dr. Redfield is a Trump appointee, Dr. Fauci has headed NIAID since '84. (Coincidentally, my birth year and the year Ghostbusters was released. A good year.)
I know that. That's why I said I wasn't talking about Dr. Fauci. I was talking about the two appointees, CDC Director Redfield and Surgeon General Adams. Check the link to my previous post.
My bad entirely because I'm not fully awake. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.
I made a brief observation, and you declare that I'm off on a delusional rant. But then, liberals are known for overreacting, aren't they?
I made a brief observation, and you declare that I'm off on a delusional rant. But then, liberals are known for overreacting, aren't they?
You literally called the press "virulent," without any sort of documentation or backup. Who's overreacting?
And has not disputed the facts in the reporting.
Facts are not their strong suit. Which is why they have to keep interrupting, ranting and lying at so-called debates.
It's kinda funny when it's Trumpists who are literally virulent now, thanks to the conduct of Covid-in-Chief. And he'll continue to spread the love. If it wasn't for the fact that each of them will infect innocent third parties, like their childrn, spouses, staff, drivers and so on, I'd say the problem will take care of itself.
It's kinda funny when it's Trumpists who are literally virulent now, thanks to the conduct of Covid-in-Chief. And he'll continue to spread the love. If it wasn't for the fact that each of them will infect innocent third parties, like their childrn, spouses, staff, drivers and so on, I'd say the problem will take care of itself.
I made a brief observation, and you declare that I'm off on a delusional rant. But then, liberals are known for overreacting, aren't they?
I’d rather overreact, because we’ve seen what under reacting does. It leads to 209,000 dead Americans.
Considering you're on about your twentieth "brief observation" (AKA drive-by) without any substance or supporting evidence now, I guess it can start to look a bit like a rant when taken in total.I made a brief observation, and you declare that I'm off on a delusional rant. But then, liberals are known for overreacting, aren't they?
And we're at 210,000 deaths and counting. So don't talk to anyone about overreactions in this context.
That really shouldn't surprise you any more than a it would if you were claiming that the sky was made of mealworms and the sun was the soul of Madeline Kahn. Both "observations" * bear precisely the same relation to reality.
*unsupported claims, actually
Make America "Great" Again, amirite?
How truly sad. You blatantly ignore the fact that I have repeatedly denounced Trump, both his debate behavior and his decision to unnecessarily expose the people riding in the car with him to his condition. Those are observed behaviors on his part, and I oppose them. But, I know how effectively the press can slant an issue. As an example, I was around in the 1980's, when the AIDS crisis led them to demonize gays, and I was around in the early part of this century, when the same press openly advanced gay rights, most notably same-sex marriage. So, when the press says something, I take it with a grain of salt. I do this with Fox News as well as the others.
But, you don't care about any of this, do you? Clearly I am a Trumplet, not because the evidence bears it out, but because I don't agree with you. You WANT me to be a Trumplet, ergo I am one.
Reality check: your feelings do not determine the truth. And there's nothing you can say, nothing you can do, to make me believe otherwise.
But, you don't care about any of this, do you? Clearly I am a Trumplet, not because the evidence bears it out, but because I don't agree with you. You WANT me to be a Trumplet, ergo I am one.
Reality check: your feelings do not determine the truth. And there's nothing you can say, nothing you can do, to make me believe otherwise.
If it walks like a Trumplet, quacks like a Trumplet, it is usually a Trumplet.
Similar threads
