• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How to fix the holographic displays in Picard

They look generic, like every other scifi show.

exactly. They have distilled Star Trek to be like any other sci fi show in story and technology. Now every Star Trek has to have dark storylines and flawed characters. Actually the characters are more flawed then done humans today. The tech itself looks terrible as well as the bridge design. The bridge that riker was on looks like any other sci fi cheap looking space set.
 
exactly. They have distilled Star Trek to be like any other sci fi show in story and technology. Now every Star Trek has to have dark storylines and flawed characters. Actually the characters are more flawed then done humans today. The tech itself looks terrible as well as the bridge design. The bridge that riker was on looks like any other sci fi cheap looking space set.
The horror...:rolleyes:
 
exactly. They have distilled Star Trek to be like any other sci fi show in story and technology, which is a good thing. Now every Star Trek has to have dark storylines and flawed characters, which is awesome. Actually the characters are more flawed then done humans today, an excellent plot point. The tech itself looks fantastic as well as the bridge design. The bridge that riker was on looks like other sci fi expensive looking space sets.

Sounds like you’re finally starting to really like the show. Good for you.
 
Last edited:
Alright, recognizing my sarcastic response is not that helpful I am going to post a longer response. Largely because this is an oft repeated critique of newer Trek that has little merit beyond the surface level.
Now every Star Trek has to have dark storylines and flawed characters.
Show me a Star Trek without flawed characters, please. Kirk is deeply flawed and acknowledges such in TOS from time to time. His mistake in "Space Seed" ends up killing people in TWOK and yet he is never treated poorly for it. Or even his remarks in TUC, probably the most "of its time" of the Trek films, yet Kirk is not treated lesser.
Picard has a very human response to the Borg in both "Family" and "First Contact" yet is not looked down upon; he is able to acknowledge his mistake and still has the respect of his crew, despite his flaws.
Actually the characters are more flawed then done humans today.
How so? Please provide examples of this exact thing that you speak of. Because, I think that many would love to have people like Burnham or Picard acknowledging their mistakes and being willing to make changes and amends.

Current Trek is not any more dark than past Trek. The only difference, the only difference is that you don't have 26 episodes of fluff to cushion the rest.
They have distilled Star Trek to be like any other sci fi show in story and technology.
Even if I thought this was so (I don't but I'll play along) how is this bad? I recall growing up and being mocked and teased for liking Trek and science fiction in general. I remember that science-fiction/fantasy had their own little section of book stores and libraries and movie sections that were treated like barely worth the shelf-space. Star Trek is no longer the only game and town and I think that's a good thing. People can like Star Trek, were T-Shirts and celebrate this franchise in a way that wasn't the case a decade ago. Technology has surged past what Trek could only dream of. Why not celebrate that instead of worrying that Trek isn't "special anymore?" Trek struggled to stay on TV and now has new lease on life. And that's bad?
 
I've seen plenty, thanks. The differences are typically in the particulars rather than in kind. They're largely like the haptic versions of the pictures in glass model of smartphones.

And they're dumb. :D
https://medium.com/@SmallPlanetApps/beautiful-ridiculous-e400d95c7c66

agreed they are dumb and impractical. Imagine having large vehicles like jets with holo buttons and displays. It’s isn’t practical and it’s frankly distracting. So they are see through so you can have them in front of your face while in a battle and waving your hands in front of your face while moving the displays around? How are these superior to the flat paneled displays that tng had? How is this an advancement?
 
Last edited:
Imagine having large vehicles like jets with holo buttons and displays.
I am. I love it.
How are these superior to the flat paneled displays that tng had? How is this an advancement?
Maybe they are; maybe they are not. It's personal preference and people get use to new tech all the time.

I have no desire to watch characters mash at panels when I do that all day at work. How very futuristic...:rolleyes:
 
Actually the characters are more flawed then done humans today.

In the real world in the past few months, we have witnessed a pathological narcissist president get over 150,000 of his own people killed by a pandemic virus by choosing to put his head in the sand instead of mobilize the resources of his country to employ the tactics of disease control that have effectively suppressed the virus in other countries. We have witnessed a vast political movement so tribalistic in its thinking that it has backed that president up instead of calling him to task, to the point where a commonsense, nonpartisan public health measure like wearing a mask has become politicized and a subject of controversy. We have witnessed law enforcement agencies throughout the country engage in vastly disproportionate, unjustified violence against racial minorities, and we have seen those same agencies react with terrible repressive violence against activists nonviolently demanding reform. We have witnessed our government's commitment to an economic ideology drive them to start pressuring people to end quarantine and sequestration in spite of the demonstrated track record these policies have of increasing infection rates and death rates. Throughout the world today, regressive politics and outright fascism are on the rise; political and economic institutions are refusing the kinds of reforms necessary to protect the environment and prevent catastrophic rises in carbon emissions to the atmosphere; racial and ethnic wars routinely break out; numerous mental health problems go untreated due to lack of resources; numerous physical health problems go untreated due to lack of resources; millions of people die prematurely due to poverty and starvation; human trafficking and pedophilia are widespread; etc. etc. etc.

None of these problems are present in PIC. People in PIC may not be perfect, and may even make self-destructive choices due to pride, but the idea that they're "worse" than people today is just flat-out false. You either have no idea what you're talking about or you're deliberately spouting bullshit to waste everyone else's time.
 
I liked the holographic LCARS display in the scene where Picard saw himself als Locutus. It looked like a modernized LCARS version. I'd use them for relaying information only. To make it more realistic I would make them opaque on the readers side, so he or she can actually read it without seeing everything behind it, and see through from the other side.

As for ship controls I would show them as real solid console that manifest infront or around of the Pilot when he sits down. The touchpads would be solid like the old consoles and I only would have floating readouts or status indicators.
 
I liked the holographic LCARS display in the scene where Picard saw himself als Locutus. It looked like a modernized LCARS version. I'd use them for relaying information only. To make it more realistic I would make them opaque on the readers side, so he or she can actually read it without seeing everything behind it, and see through from the other side.

As for ship controls I would show them as real solid console that manifest infront or around of the Pilot when he sits down. The touchpads would be solid like the old consoles and I only would have floating readouts or status indicators.

That would have been instantly better.
 
agreed they are good and practical. Imagine having large vehicles like jets with holo buttons and displays. It’s totally practical and it’s not distracting whatsoever. So they are see through so you can have them in front of your face while in a battle and waving your hands in front of your face while moving the displays around. These are totally superior to the flat paneled displays that tng had. This is an advancement.

:beer:
 
As I told EC and posted here and elsewhere, it really does not make sense to create solid controls when you've already "dematerialized" (ir, reduced controls to information) the functions. It makes more sense to have them as part of the holo-interface.

The reality is, you and the handful of people complaining are more interested in the knee jerk of not having a standard and familiar LCARS all the time, and hate anything new.

Personally I liked having a few familiar scenes with LCARS as a throwback and then moving the fuck on with a 2020 update. I don't know, that seems logical to me.

RAMA

I liked the holographic LCARS display in the scene where Picard saw himself als Locutus. It looked like a modernized LCARS version. I'd use them for relaying information only. To make it more realistic I would make them opaque on the readers side, so he or she can actually read it without seeing everything behind it, and see through from the other side.

As for ship controls I would show them as real solid console that manifest infront or around of the Pilot when he sits down. The touchpads would be solid like the old consoles and I only would have floating readouts or status indicators.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top