• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Temporal Cold War in Enterprise and franchise continuity

Yeah, of course, it's probably better to just not think about all this stuff and just enjoy ENT & DSC and any other future prequel/interquel/reboot-prequel hybrid/prebootquel for what they are, and not judge it for looking more advanced than previous works that are chronologically set after it. But that ain't happening... not with this fan base.
More's the pity.
 
Many people have the opinion that Enterprise, and then later Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard, created a lot of violations of previous continuity. Some, for example, would say that Discovery isn't actually in the Prime timeline. However, perhaps there's a more subtle way to deal with inconsistencies between older and newer series. Perhaps the differences are the result of the Temporal Cold War in Enterprise. Temporal agents from the future would have gone back in time to restore the timeline to the best of their abilities, so the events of all shows before Enterprise would have generally happened the same way, but certain details might be impossible to fix completely, resulting in many small discrepancies. The result is a sort of "Cold War Prime" timeline where minor differences exist, but the overall chain of events is the same. The Kelvin timeline would actually be a branch off the Cold War Prime timeline rather than the original Prime timeline.

Anyways, just a thought. Does this work for fixing most issues in continuity between older and newer series?

FINALLY, another person sees an "in continuity" means to resolve the "discontinuity" within the STAR TREK franchise. The producers of DISCO would have saved themselves a lot of headaches if they used the TCW as a reason why Spock suddenly had a human foster sister, when previously this was not the case (though, personally, I would have made the show post-NEM).
 
Spock had a brother in Star Trek V, no temporal reason was needed for it. The writers do not need to explain continuity or production changes in the script, a shame Discovery started that nonsense in season 2 about the holograms.
 
Spock had a brother in Star Trek V, no temporal reason was needed for it. The writers do not need to explain continuity or production changes in the script, a shame Discovery started that nonsense in season 2 about the holograms.
It was much better how they did it with the intro to If Memory Serves

"Yes this is how it used to look, this is how it looks now. same story"
 
FINALLY, another person sees an "in continuity" means to resolve the "discontinuity" within the STAR TREK franchise. The producers of DISCO would have saved themselves a lot of headaches if they used the TCW as a reason why Spock suddenly had a human foster sister, when previously this was not the case (though, personally, I would have made the show post-NEM).

As far as I know, they never said he didn't have a foster sister on TOS.

:shrug:
 
As ambassador to Earth it was logical to understand all human customs, including their mating ones.

Sarek: "I must study the mating habits of the human culture."

Aide: "But, sire, there isn't one human culture. There are thousands, spread across the entire planet and beyond, each with their own nuance and peculiarities."

Sarek: "Understood." (puts on sunglasses)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top