which is also the move some of you pulled with DSC, sorry I mean "STD", Season 2.
Yeah, people don't think much of that show, but it's not their fault that it's not good.
which is also the move some of you pulled with DSC, sorry I mean "STD", Season 2.
Cool story.Yeah, people don't think much of that show, but it's not their fault that it's not good.
I don't even want to see Kirk in SNW.............
[TEAL'C]I am prepared.[/TEAL'C]
That's the point of this thread.It's from We Got This Covered, so take that "news" with a whole shaker of salt.
That would be the preferred option. I could care less about his sexuality but am even more annoyed that he will appear at all.I don't even want to see Kirk in SNW.............
That would be the preferred option. I could care less about his sexuality but am even more annoyed that he will appear at all.
True.I’d be surprised if he shows up prior to the final season.
If they're borrowing material from the RMP novelization, they best be making Love Instructors canon. I might boycott this show if they don't.Well, didn't Roddenberry imply Kirk was bi-sexual in the TMP novelization? This isn't exactly new.
It showed that he was in denial. Which is basically the same as saying he kind of was.Well, didn't Roddenberry imply Kirk was bi-sexual in the TMP novelization? This isn't exactly new.
Why bring up "The Orville" in a Star Trek thread?Yeah, people don't think much of that show, but it's not their fault that it's not good.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.