I'd watch a version of Voyager that had no Ocampans. I found Kes to be godawful boring, not to mention the romantic aspect of her relationship with Neelix a bit creepy, given that she was so young even by Ocampan standards.I always thought Voyager would work as a big budget movie, akin to the 1999 Lost in Space.
Voyager is chasing the Maquis, both ships are scooped up and dropped into Borg space (likely as part of a Borg experiment or random wormhole this time because nobody cares about Caretakers, Kazon and the Ocampa) where they meet Neelix (who's probably on the run from the Borg), the big baddie Borg Queen and rescue Seven of Nine. After lots of running and explosions the 2 crews learn to work together, and they use a Borg transwarp hub to get home. All in 2 hours!
There are a lot of fanfic stories that serve this purpose, and it's interesting to see the variety of takes people have about the crew of Voyager, returning after the longest 3-week mission in recent Starfleet history. Just seeing them trying to readjust to being on Earth (or their respective Federation homeworlds), trying to cope with the more formal ways of a different ship (just imagine Harry calling his superior officers by their first names on any other starship), even just readjusting to their own families - and possibly discovering that the memories were better than the reality - could take a season in itself.Move on and make new shows - maybe even a Voyager follow-up !
I've lost count of how many remakes there are of The Parent Trap and Freaky Friday. I guess it's not out of the question to update these movies once, since modern kids would wonder WTF those clunky phones are that Hayley Mills uses in The Parent Trap, and they wouldn't even get the humor in the typewriter scene in Freaky Friday (Annabell's mother's mind in her daughter's body, attempting to get through a normal day of school, trying to cope with a typing test and having no idea how electric typewriters work).Point being, Hollywood has been making excellent reboots since practically Day One, sometimes less than a decade after the previous version.
But it seems that every few years, there's yet another version of these movies, and I have no idea why they're considered necessary.
That said, I won't argue that sometimes the newer version is better. For instance, I can't imagine anyone doing Henry V better than Kenneth Branagh.
NO!Here are some reasons why I think a reboot would work.
- It can exist outside of all current Trek. It could even be sold as Kelvinverse Voyager.

In that case, why not just make an entirely original show?- It would be a great way to bring in new viewers to Trek as the show could be made in a way where it didn't need much prior knowledge of the Trek universe.
I repeat: Why not just make an entirely new show? If you're not going to bother being consistent in any way with the source material, it's just a cynical marketing ploy to call it Voyager.- It doesn't need to be faithful to the original and they can pick and choose to reuse the best story arcs, characters, aliens as well as adding completely new ones. It would feel fresh for new and old viewers alike.
I want to know WTF happened to the Borg baby. Fanfic has provided several possibilities, but I'd like the show (any variety of it) bother to remember that they brought a guest character aboard the ship, and then forgot about her before the end of the episode.Any other reasons for or reasons against a reboot?
Every generation deserves their own good iconic version of popular characters. What did we do to deserve Leonardo DiCaprio in The Man in the Iron Mask? The earliest version of that I saw was with Richard Chamberlain as King Louis/Philippe, and it was depicted as a serious historical drama. The DiCaprio version was a mess that couldn't decide if it wanted to be historical drama or a parody of historical drama. The only characters worth watching in that version are the Musketeers; the main character certainly isn't.Exactly. Every generation deserves their own Zorro or Sherlock Holmes or maybe even Seven of Nine.
And, honestly, Hollywood has been in the remake business since the silent era. Objecting to remakes is like objecting to the sun rising in the east. It's the nature of the beast.
Kes would still be boring. About the only thing those characters would have in common would be short childhoods.I was watching The Gift tonight, and there was one thought that crossed my mind. I would love to see a version of Voyager where Kim actually did die in Scorpion and we spent the next 4 years with Kes and Seven together. I think it would have been great.
If you want to use the same actress who played adult Miral in "Endgame", she's currently playing Olivia Quartermaine on General Hospital.Also
Yes but it would be in a alternate universe staring Seven of Nine so in away we would be getting a Seven series. In my idea the show is set in Picard time so we don't have to de-age any actors or anything liked that. In that universe Voyager is going to be one of 3 ships sent to explore the Delta Quadrant through a artificial wormhole for a 5 year mission. Seven of Nine who was never assimilated by the Borg is the Captain of Voyager. Tuvok and Kim are captain of the other ships who will be semi-regulars on the show.
The main cast is
4 Torres and Paris's daughter who still found each other in this universe but aren't along because the actors have busy directing careers
Sounds like a candidate for the ending of the novel Federation.I'd check out a reboot, but I'd far rather see a new ship and a new crew. But there's certainly room to explore the premise further - another show about a starship stranded far from the Federation could be very cool.
Fun fact: The actress who played Varinia in Spartacus later had a guest part on TNG.Are you suggesting 1950s movies generally do not hold up well? Haven't watched All About Eve or Sunset Blvd lately I guess.
To me the only thing about 1950s Hollywood movies that don't hold up are the portrayals of women being imbecilic in movies like Some Like It Hot, and the refusal to show any moral ambiguity in crime movies or ever end with the criminal getting away. And the latter isn't even an issue in non-American films.
Fanfic has provided, with some of the Voyager crew going along because they're either searching for what/who was left behind in the Delta Quadrant (ie. Seven searching for Axum, or looking in on the Borg kids to see how they're doing), or Harry realizing that home isn't really where he wants to be and for him life really is about the journey.I don't think I'd want to see any of the series rebooted, even Enterprise which i don't like. Would I want to see a sequel series? Yes. Having an entirely new ship returning to the delta quadrant to continue what Voyager started would be pretty cool. I'd love to see how weird and terrifying the Delta Quadrant could be with today's production values.
But Voyager is a kind of Gilligan's Island. The similarity is that even though the island can move, they still can't get home.It's a case of "to each, their own" then.
Personally I'd hate to see Gilligan's Island or M*A*S*H or Starsky and Hutch or Three's Company or Cheers or any other classics remade just so younger generations can have "their" version. To me, if something is good, it's good and you accept it for what it is regardless of when it was made.
By your own admission, you've never seen most of it.No, I wouldn't. It would ruin my memories of the series.
I read the Logan's Run novel years before I was able to see the movie (I was 13 when I read the book - years too young to be allowed to watch the movie in a theatre). There are two sequels, btw: Logan's World, and Logan's Search.^^^ I wonder if that may have something to do with how the work in question is primarily known, as a book or as a film. Most people would think of Little Women and Pride and Prejudice as books, first and foremost. But a lot of people (like me until I read your post, @Greg Cox !) wouldn't even be able to tell you that Logan's Run was based on a book. And while more people might know that Planet of the Apes was based on a book (I read that one way-back-when, during the first film series's run), it's still a relatively obscure work.
The novel differs in some significant ways from the movie.
The reason for Lastday was population control, not nuclear war, and Deep Sleep happened on the 21st birthday, not the 30th. Carousel isn't in the novel. People lived in numerous cities around the world, all connected by the mazecar system, and "gypsies" were bands of people who refused to live in the cities. In the novel Jessica is already on Lastday when she and Logan meet, and so is he - there's no undercover assignment to find Sanctuary; he just wants to survive.
I missed them when they were first on. The sci-fi channel in Canada runs them on weekdays (4 am in my time zone), so I've been watching them. I have no clue which episodes belong to which series, and I know I'm not watching them in the right order. But it's something to watch that I haven't seen before.Sadly, I can't say -- I didn't watch any of the Stargate series (serieses?).
I addressed this point in my entry in the current Voyager caption contest.(casting someone as Chuckles who can actually act and has a work ethic / some charisma would be the only possible improvement).

Agreed.If Seven acts like she does in Picard, I wouldn't like to watch a Voyager reboot.
Exactly. If you compare Mel Gibson's Hamlet with Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet, the Gibson version is superior. It's period-appropriate, and Gibson did a much better job of playing Hamlet. Branagh's version is an anachronistic mess that I couldn't stand long enough to even finish watching it.I don't think people hate remakes so much as they hate bad remakes.
The British version didn't have the genius of John Ritter, and I am reasonably sure that Lucille Ball never appeared in the British version.Except that Three's Company is itself a remake of a 1973 british sitcom called Man About The House.
Less reliance on the holodeck, sure. But eliminate it entirely? No. There are only so many games of Kadis-kot or kal-toh the crew can play before they go insane from boredom. The holodeck is necessary to their mental health, as well as a safe environment for simulating complicated things they need to practice (ie. Seven's surgery in the episode where Icheb donates his cortical node to her).Focus in on what makes Voyager's situation different. No fucking holodeck. Actual wear and tear to the ship. Much greater focus on the lack of supplies and resources.
What they should have done from about the second episode is have Janeway realize that Voyager needed to be retrofitted to accommodate families and children. The idea she seems to have had, that she and Chakotay would still be fit to command the ship after 7 decades was ludicrous. Kids should have been on the "to do" list for long-term planning from the get-go, and fraternization rules should have been modified.I think maybe bringing the time from 80 years down to something like 20 or 30 might also have been a good idea. Makes the decision to return a little more sensible.
For that, you'd need the original actress who was supposed to play Janeway. She had the charisma of a piece of cardboard.I'd have Janeway as the more introverted intellectual captain who didn't really have much charisma or 'the common touch'. Then Chakotay would be more of a people person with combat experience and bags of charisma, and you'd have Tuvok to appeal to Janeway's more scientific side in the same sort of way Spock balanced out Bones.
Star Trek Continues did that, and most of the episodes are so good that it's almost like watching the real thing.MAYBE if they had made it a prequel to season 1 of TOS, or stories set after season 3 but before the movies, and they stayed faithful...
Neelix was one of the characters who had a story arc that lasted all seven seasons. He started out as a mercenary conman whose first interest was always what he wanted, and he wasn't averse to bailing if he screwed up.Firstly, the actor who played Neelix was not up to the role. He had the look, but his acting skills did not do justice to the part. I've said this here before, my apologies for repeating myself. Neelix could have been... no make that needed to be so much more. His place in the ensemble was important... he was a comic "foil" for Tuvok and Paris, but none of it worked. The part of Phlox on Enterprise was similar. but Phlox was far more interesting, far more likable, and far better acted. And Phlox didn't have seven seasons to flesh himself out.
But Janeway refused to allow that, and over the years, Neelix gradually became a more serious character who learned new skills and had a better awareness of his own worth and what he really wanted out of life. He learned to be selfless, and I was sorry to see him leave.
Except they did.I am glad they didn't use Paris' past and the Marquis' conflict to drive stories, though. That would have made it worse.
Paris is another character who grew throughout the seven seasons. He was a different person at the end than he was at the beginning.
Maybe a couple of seasons, but four would be too long. I'm not suggesting everyone would become a 'happy starship family' but there needed to be a better balance between the conflicting sides of the crew.Only if the Maquis remained Maquis, and the conflict between the crew was not resolved for about 4 seasons
In what episode was that established?I hope a reboot would deal with galactic structure more. Voyager was thrown to the galactic rim - maybe even hitting the barrier.
