To be honest, I wish they had done that. Could have added an interesting dynamic to things and it would have been an interesting take on the Stargate program becoming international.I remember there was speculation that it might've been the Odyssey that bought it, so the SGC would have to depend on the Russians for a while for ship-stuff, but they went with the simpler option.
To be honest, I wish they had done that. Could have added an interesting dynamic to things and it would have been an interesting take on the Stargate program becoming international.
To start the season I wanted to say something about the SG-1 premiere and they did it with Atlantis here as well. I appreciated that both season premieres actually showed the cliffhanger and what actually happened with our crew. On SG-1, the Korolev is destroyed and we go into the break not knowing what happened to Daniel or Mitchell. When we get the new season, instead of jumping forward to the point where they are all of a sudden alright, we actually get to see what happened to them. If there is one pet peeve I always have with cliffhangers, most series always tend to jump forward and either deal with the cliffhanger too fast or barely touch on it and then move on. There's a reason you guys do cliffhangers, to make the season enders exciting. Well, we are hanging and we don't just get back up and life continues. We need a way to get pulled back up.
I think it was the second season of Boston Legal where they retooled the show and in the second episode introduce new characters and William Shatner goes 'New people? If there were new people they would have been introduced in the season premiere!'Plus, if the show's doing any kind of re-tool, they might have to get to it immediately, which means they have to brush aside all old business faster than they like because the new actors need to be incorporated
I think a lot of it is a combination of the changeovers in the cast and people feeling the Ori weren't as engaging an antagonist. As you've seen, in their first season they're somewhat Borglike in their general invulnerability.
It's somewhat akin to concerns about Voyager encountering the Borg. They shouldn't be able to fight their way out, so if they do that successfully it's a WTF, and if they escape through non-combat means enough times, you start to wonder what happened to the "force of nature" that we first met in TNG. But also, SG-1 doesn't even have an Ori equivalent of Seven of Nine (usually)...you can engage the Priors, but for the most part they get as much characterization as your typical Borg drone.
Plus, as I said, from a 50,000 foot view, in terms of writing, the new arc is uncomfortably similar to the old one in terms of "SG-1 must find a way to resolve a conflict with a race of aliens posing as gods." They just upped the power level with the Ori.
One thing that bothers me about "The Ark of Truth", to this day (no spoilers here), is that it raises what I consider a compelling moral conundrum but then throws it aside in the interest of expediency.
Is there a “no spoilers for season 10” reason these seasons were contentious? I mean I miss Jack and Bald Teal’c as much as the next person (and I still think Reckoning and Threads was a perfect way to end the series) but it’s been a fun ride so far.
I have to talk about the Ancients now. When I asked a few weeks ago if the Ancients were good or bad, I wanted to believe they were good. Well, in this episode we got confirmation that they are cowards. They say they don't want to interfere with mortal life but the Ori are not mortal. The Ori have already interfered and the Ancients are like, humanity you take care of it. I actually was reading a great question asked on one of the forums and I was thinking about it watching this episode. I was thinking about the episode The 5th Race and how Thor said that Humanity was close to being that 5th race. Well, where are the Nox or the Furlings. Heck, the Nox have been completely forgotten, yet they could be a great help right now in fighting an enemy that the only way to beat them is to hover them over the Supergate right as it opens. The Ori and Ancients are both bad, and quite frankly petty. I think I was wrong when I compared the Ori and Ancients to the Prophets and the Pah-Wraiths. I think the better comparison would be to go to Babylon 5, and the Vorlons and the Shadows. I hope they find this weapon and Daniel Jackson has a John Sheridan "Get the Hell Out of Our Galaxy" moment sometime during this season.
I was a bit disappointed that the only Atlantis characters who had anything meaningful to do in The Pegasus Project were Weir and McKay. Not anything against those characters, but they were introduced in SG-1 anyway, so there isn't really any novelty in seeing them interact with the SG-1 cast, and that's why crossovers are so fun, IMO. The novelty of seeing different casts interact. I mean, I get that it was just one episode, and the Atlantis cast had their own episodes to focus on. Still, they should have at least given Sheppard a larger role in the episode. For the months leading up to the seeing the episode, I kept hoping Sheppard and Vala would be playfully flirting with each other, it would totally rock. But, alas, nothing. Mitchell and McKay had some good moments, though.I also loved all the little banters between casts. All the stuff at the beginning was gold, the McKay and Carter scenes are always a lot of fun (Nice shout out to Grace Under Pressure) and I just loved how they took so much from both shows and made it work really really well. This single episode was so much better than any episode of Crisis on Infinite Earths. That's how you do a single episode crossover.
Not sure how the military advisor would have anything to do with that. Vala is not a military officer, and the intent of the scene was that she was acting inappropriately.The military advisor seems to be missing, otherwise the scene with Vala practically sitting on that senator's lap would not have happened.
Also, that the writers, instead of taking the fan's complaints into account, just flippantly said "If you don't like it you don't have to watch it" (or was that later with SGU?) I get it that writers have to do their own thing and cannot listen to every fan, but if complaints are so consistent and loud and a show gets changed so much from its core, maybe there is reason to listen.
And one of my personal gripes, that a lot of Farscape fans came over who loved these seasons but never made an attempt to watch what came before and didn't care. I once read on Gateworld someone asking "Who is Janet Fraiser" and another replying "I think she was some kind of doctor." For people who still missed and mourned her deeply, that was just insulting.
I was a bit disappointed that the only Atlantis characters who had anything meaningful to do in The Pegasus Project were Weir and McKay. Not anything against those characters, but they were introduced in SG-1 anyway, so there isn't really any novelty in seeing them interact with the SG-1 cast, and that's why crossovers are so fun, IMO. The novelty of seeing different casts interact. I mean, I get that it was just one episode, and the Atlantis cast had their own episodes to focus on. Still, they should have at least given Sheppard a larger role in the episode. For the months leading up to the seeing the episode, I kept hoping Sheppard and Vala would be playfully flirting with each other, it would totally rock. But, alas, nothing. Mitchell and McKay had some good moments, though.
That's a bummer to hear. That feels like today where it seems like if you have any criticism of a show you're just labeled as a troll and not to be taken seriously.
I'm surprised and bummed by that. I've talked to many Farscape fans and a lot of those people were just really nice. I know these shows have their bad apples, (It's inevitable really) but this was the first time I've heard anything negative towards Farscape fans. As for the Who is Janet Frasier talk, yeah that is wrong. I will say Season 9 did feel like a different show, and Jack not being there was a big reason why.
I guess it didn't really bother me that it was mainly Weir and McKay. Sheppard got some good lines in, like the whole thing with the Citrus, and Zelenka had a nice role, but you can only do so much in a crossover episode. What we lost in the cast interactions I think we gained in the fact that they were fighting the Wraith and the Ori at the same time. That allowed both series to shine rather than letting one overshadow the other.
I think if I had one minor gripe, I think this might have been better served as just a Friday Night Stargate event where both episodes could just go together. Then you had time for more character interactions and maybe even include Teyla and Ronon. I brought up Crisis on Infinate Earths in comparison to this episode last night because I was thinking about how crossovers work now and how the CW shows feels more fanwank than anything else and the writers seem to forget they are supposed to actually tell a story. I think that's what Pegasus project did. It was a crossover, but the focus was still on the story rather than the fact that it was a crossover.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.