• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Season 3 episode names!

Scavengers”
The crew bumps into a group of — you guessed it — scavengers during their mission to wherever Dax has sent them. These are the people we’ve seen in the teaser, including a Cardassian and a member of Morn’s race. They’re also those Andorians. Our heroes convince the scavengers to stand down, gaining new allies in the process. Perhaps there’s also an initial run-in with the Big Bads.

I have a feeling these events occur in the first episode or more to the point during the year that Burnham spends by herself. By the time Burnham reunites with Discovery she has the long hair going on. Also I think the group attacking Burnham and Book aren't scavengers but one of the factions that the Federation has split itself into and potentially the main villains of the season
 
How can a serialized TV series have 2-part installments, when all of the season's episodes are parts of a whole by design?
 
Aka, they were planning on an episode, then found they had the budget to put in some filler and do two, but no funds were allocated to inventing a new title...

S3 is likely to be more preplanned than either of the two so far. But may end up being as impromptu and disjointed as those, for potential viral reasons. The ones we got the episode names for aren't part of any known backpedaling or track-switching process yet, though, probably.

Timo Saloniemi
 
With "Picard", the episodes were, at first, preplanned as two-parters for each director, but the first three eps ended up being closely connected so went to Hanelle M. Culpepper, and then there was some reshuffling of the other directors.

But even when DS9 episodes have different titles, they can be closely interconnected. eg. DS9's "The Homecoming"/"The Circle"/"The Siege", "Improbable Cause"/"The Die is Cast", etc.
 
All the episodes are connected. But those episodes are more connected than usual. The difference is in the degree.
From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself. Having part 1 & 2 story makes more sense in an episodic context where not every episode continues the specific narrative of the preceding installment.
 
From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself. Having part 1 & 2 story makes more sense in an episodic context where not every episode continues the specific narrative of the preceding installment.

If you view it as a book, then, yeah maybe. However, as a comic fan, the overarching story-line will have a title and each issue in that story-line will have it's own title.

Hell, even Babylon 5, which JMS referred to as a "Novel for Television," a forefather of our serialized shows today, had two-part episodes. Episodes were self-contained in that while they drove the arcs forward, each individual episode would have a clear beginning, middle, and end. For the two-parters, the middle would be the end of the first episode. Really any serialized show does this.
 
How can a serialized TV series have 2-part installments, when all of the season's episodes are parts of a whole by design?
By that logic, why bother giving the episodes separate titles anyway? Why not just designate them all Episode 1, Episode 2 and so on in that order?
From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself.
Or you could compare it to the Bible, which has its chapters divided into verses. Modern Star Trek: it's almost Biblical.
 
Unification III? Ha!
Doesn’t make any sense since that’s a TNG episode. Discovery can also have a episode called Unification.
 
S3 is likely to be more preplanned than either of the two so far.

Here's hoping they planned beyond the season midpoint this year. I'd dearly love a story that didn't veer sharply into crazy at about the two thirds mark.

Unification III? Ha!
Doesn’t make any sense since that’s a TNG episode. .

Just a thought, but that may have occurred to them.
 
By that logic, why bother giving the episodes separate titles anyway? Why not just designate them all Episode 1, Episode 2 and so on in that order?
Absolutely not! Hate it when shows can’t be bothered to name their episodes. I know a show is bad when it’s pilot episode is called “Pilot”.

Novels and other books can have a chapter titles.
Parts of a serialised story in any medium can have their own titles.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top