In which episode do they meet the Andromeda 

Scavengers”
The crew bumps into a group of — you guessed it — scavengers during their mission to wherever Dax has sent them. These are the people we’ve seen in the teaser, including a Cardassian and a member of Morn’s race. They’re also those Andorians. Our heroes convince the scavengers to stand down, gaining new allies in the process. Perhaps there’s also an initial run-in with the Big Bads.
On the starship Discovery, hope lives againEpisode 1: “That Hope Is You”
How can a serialized TV series have 2-part installments, when all of the season's episodes are parts of a whole by design?
That’s emphasizing my point. It didn’t make sense the first time DSC & Picard did it, and it still doesn’t now."Such Sweet Sorrow", Parts 1 & 2.
"Picard": "Et in Arcadia Ego", Parts 1 & 2.
That’s emphasizing my point. It didn’t make sense the first time DSC & Picard did it, and it still doesn’t now.
From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself. Having part 1 & 2 story makes more sense in an episodic context where not every episode continues the specific narrative of the preceding installment.All the episodes are connected. But those episodes are more connected than usual. The difference is in the degree.
I think he's trying to hint/troll that he has inside information about the production, and is spoiling in an unspoiler fashion that Vulcan has also been destroyed in the Prime timeline sometime post 24th century.It's true. Vulcan was destroyed in the Kelvin Timeline and Romulus was destroyed in the Prime Timeline.
I know exactly what he's doing.I think he's trying to hint/troll that he has inside information about the production, and is spoiling in an unspoiler fashion that Vulcan has also been destroyed in the Prime timeline sometime post 24th century.
From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself. Having part 1 & 2 story makes more sense in an episodic context where not every episode continues the specific narrative of the preceding installment.
By that logic, why bother giving the episodes separate titles anyway? Why not just designate them all Episode 1, Episode 2 and so on in that order?How can a serialized TV series have 2-part installments, when all of the season's episodes are parts of a whole by design?
Or you could compare it to the Bible, which has its chapters divided into verses. Modern Star Trek: it's almost Biblical.From a naming standpoint, it’s still somewhat nonsensical. It’s like saying here’s chapter 2, part 1 and chapter 2, part 2, or saying chapter 2 has two chapters itself.
"Star Trek should always be moving forward. No, wait, not like that!"Season 3 is moving the Trek universe into a whole new era with a very different status quo. There's no doubt that section of the fanbase who hate and fear change are going to fucking hate it.
S3 is likely to be more preplanned than either of the two so far.
Unification III? Ha!
Doesn’t make any sense since that’s a TNG episode. .
Absolutely not! Hate it when shows can’t be bothered to name their episodes. I know a show is bad when it’s pilot episode is called “Pilot”.By that logic, why bother giving the episodes separate titles anyway? Why not just designate them all Episode 1, Episode 2 and so on in that order?
Unification III? Ha!
Doesn’t make any sense since that’s a TNG episode. Discovery can also have a episode called Unification.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.