Best bet is to walk away, my friend.Happy to amuse you.
Best bet is to walk away, my friend.Happy to amuse you.
You bet.Best bet is to walk away, my friend.
Not to snip but I hate this. Depressing is not crap and anyone can struggle with it. I think they portrayed Picard in the most realistic and relatable way possible with depression and questions over legacy. And it wasn't just over Data either.
I know realism and Trek don't always go hand-in-hand but this one I like. Show me people struggling with mental health and need that support. Mental health conditions are still poorly understood and Picard is a great example of how it can be accurately portrayed.
*rant over*
Maybe not a cause, but definitely a contributor, in that context.So in a way you could even include Picard as a possible cause of an organic apocalypse.
That's a push too far in the opposite direction. Nuclear implies a hierarchy. There's no reason to have a designated head of a family for it to function. Nor does a family need to stay together. The issue is abandonment of the responsibility of children, not loss of particular family structures.But devil's advocate--this is Star Trek--a more idealistic and optimistic view of the future. Perhaps it IS better to portray strong nuclear families, especially fathers of color. Ben Sisko was one of if not THE best fathers in Star Trek.
That is a wonderful and very logical way to reason through it. But, Picard isn't acting logical. You call it unreasonable in the next paragraph and that is quite right-there is no reason to it. It is purely emotion because Data's death was the last in a long series of losses that Picard finally was begining to fray from. To quote Tolkien (who endured many deaths of friends in WW 1) "His death (C.S. Lewis') feels like a blow very close to the roots."This man has sent people off to their deaths before. Wesley's father, Ensign Sito Jaxa, to name a couple. He's been defended by those that have lost their lives before. Losing Data is no walk in the park for sure, but it wasn't just saving him, Data saved what was left of the Enterprise, Earth and any other planet Shinzon might feel the need to irradicate. He lost a friend yes, but not for not.
Again, very logical. But doesn't touch on the emotion that Picard is feeling and where he is at psychologically.just think it's unreasonable for "JL" to have done what he did. Star Fleet called his bluff and he just quit. Jean-Luc Picard, Captain of Star Fleet's flag vessel, the arbiter of many a conflict, stopped the borg from assimilating humanity in the past, lived an entire life in the span of 40 minutes, took his rank insignia off to save a race of people from being forcibly removed/eliminated, promoted to Admiral, organized a fleet of ships to save the Federations biggest enemy, just frakin QUIT! "I've had enough, all those billions of lives mean nothing, I'll just go off and grow some grapes and drink wine..." ... for 18 years!
Rewatched this today, lots of issues with it, including one more than before - Raffi and Seven did shots together while (randomly) holding hands?? I've zero issue with Seven being a grizzled drinking BAMF, but they made Raffi's drinking an ugly problem just a few episodes before.
I just think it's unreasonable for "JL" to have done what he did. Star Fleet called his bluff and he just quit. Jean-Luc Picard, Captain of Star Fleet's flag vessel, the arbiter of many a conflict, stopped the borg from assimilating humanity in the past, lived an entire life in the span of 40 minutes, took his rank insignia off to save a race of people from being forcibly removed/eliminated, promoted to Admiral, organized a fleet of ships to save the Federations biggest enemy, just frakin QUIT! "I've had enough, all those billions of lives mean nothing, I'll just go off and grow some grapes and drink wine..." ... for 18 years!
his is backwards. Picard wasn't bluffing, he was calling Starfleet's bluff. Except that they weren't bluffing, and accepted his resignation instead of folding. It was a reasonable gamble, since he had already played all the higher-percentage moves by then. It just didn't happen to work.
Reasonable gamble? Seriously?
Either way, he went to grow grapes and Romulans died.
You missed the point by 20,000 kilometers.What are the statistics on that? Real world ones. Just making up a number, but what if 75% of families of a certain race are broken homes? Is it racial to portray a family of the same race as a broken home, or racial NOT to do so?
Reasonable gamble? Seriously? Either way, he went to grow grapes and Romulans died.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.