At least they don't lick their fingertips, like so many do turning pages in books!
Yes, exactly. Even if she talked about mankind banding together and solving our problems together, that could've worked and come off as insightful. But the "The men who go on these spaceships will solve everything, you guys!" speech just sounds like she caught last week's episode.Tribble Threat and JohnnyQuest put it better than I did, I thought it was too on the nose and cheesy that she focused on the invention of spaceships leading to the solution of problems. I would have liked it better if she had spoken of a brighter future in general with "mankind will figure out ways to feed the starving millions and cure diseases and we might even invent space ships and go to other planets" instead of "we'll have spaceships and the people on the spaceships will save us"
Yes, exactly. Even if she talked about mankind banding together and solving our problems together, that could've worked and come off as insightful. But the "The men who go on these spaceships will solve everything, you guys!" speech just sounds like she caught last week's episode.
Got to say, I never had a problem with it.![]()
Me, neither.Got to say, I never had a problem with it.![]()
An economy of language is fine. But Edith describing pretty much exactly what we see on Star Trek every week is just dumb.There needs to be an economy of language to convey that point.
"And then, these men who go out into space will occasionally fight a lizard man called a 'Gorn.' But a telepathic alien in a sparkly toga will break up the fight before the guy who looks just like that fellow in the red plaid shirt directly on my right can finish the Gorn off..."Calling to mind what we saw last week on Star Trek fits that bill to a tee.
It couldn't have been too dumb. The episode won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation in 1967, beating out four other episodes.is just dumb
I know. I love the rest of the episode, but that moment makes me grind my teeth now.It couldn't have been too dumb. The episode won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation in 1967, beating out four other episodes.
So, if you win awards you're no longer dumb?It couldn't have been too dumb. The episode won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation in 1967, beating out four other episodes.
http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/1968-hugo-awards/
I literally didn't say that.So, if you win awards you're no longer dumb?
Sorry. Winning awards means "not too dumb?"I literally didn't say that.
Yes! It means, not too dumb to win an award.Sorry. Winning awards means "not too dumb?"
No worries!And, I'm just having a bit of fun with it.
Great! Now I just need to go win an award!Yes! It means, not too dumb to win an award.![]()
I dont watch alot of TOS i just know Old school fans like that episodeNow how about this:
I don't get what's so great about "City on the Edge of Forever"
I don't like time travel stories into Earth's past, but even beyond that I find the episode boring.
Edith Keeler comes off as crazy for rambling at homeless people that they shouldn't give up hope because "one day we will have spaceships! (Edit: it seems I must add: ) And the men in the spaceships will solve all our problems!"
And how am I supposed to take the idea that Edith is Kirk's "One Tru Wuv" seriously when the guy has a new "romantic" interest every other week? (Plus, love in Star Trek, particularly TOS and TNG, is mostly portrayed as pretty cheap anyway, with people falling in love at the drop of a hat, or rather whenever a beautiful/handsome guest star shows up, only to forget about it by the end of the episode)
Hey! James Woods did a great job at portraying... himself :P I mean that's basically what he always does
Not everyone enjoys romance.I mean let's not forget that Twilight (remember that movie/book?) also won awards and that has dialogue and narration that's too dumb to believe.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.