Thank you, thank you.Well played, good sir.

Thank you, thank you.Well played, good sir.
Something about the bully/jerk element terrified the shit out of six-year-old me.He was a complete and total jerk and the ideal Klingon when it came to aggressive demeanor.
I get that the Klingons were the Soviets. There's even a Bloom County or Outland strip where the characters lament the Cold War's over, there's no more bad guys, and now Klingon's are serving in Starfleet. But I don't think it's the perfect Star Trek villain for the time, but definitely the perfect villain for a mainstream action/sci-fi movie. Soviet villains were everywhere in the 80s. Here, the Federation good guys (U.S.) against the Klingon bad guy (Soviet bad guy) who wants to acquire a new powerful weapon to destroy freedom and peace. It wasn't using the Cold War allegory to make any interesting examination of the conflict or bring up any interesting questions. It was just feeding into a jingoistic narrative that was popular in mainstream America at the time. I still enjoy the movie but the villain and his goal is very pedestrian.Lord Garth said:. Klingons = Soviets. Detente was over. Reagan was fighting what, in his words, was "The Evil Empire".
Kruge was the perfect Star Trek villain for the time.
The only time a Berman Era Klingon (the whole thing, not just ENT) ever actually felt even remotely imposing was when they had a basketball player playing a Klingon in "Gambit". That's it. And that's only because he was seven feet tall, towered over Worf, and wasn't much for words.
Similarly, I've never been able to take Kruge seriously. Around the same time, my parents bought our first VCR for Christmas, along with the first three Trek movies and BTTF.
chili.The Scariest Klingon is Worf after Jadzia sends him to bed with
I alway hear Reverend Jim from Taxi.Yes. I watched SFS way after BTTF and all I could see and hear was Doc Brown. He might as well have exclaimed "Great Scott!" at some point.
He has a good face for a Klingon warrior though.
Similarly, I've never been able to take Kruge seriously. Around the same time, my parents bought our first VCR for Christmas, along with the first three Trek movies and BTTF. By then I had already seen TMP. And something about the cover of WOK made me think I was going to like it.**So I decided to go with SFS. So my dad hooked it all up Christmas morning, but my mom insisted we watched BTTF first. I loved Doc immediately. I'm pretty sure the bit where the model car starts on fire was the hardest I'd ever laughed at a movie/show at that point in my life.
So, sure enough, we put in SFS and get to the Valkris scene and Lloyd's voice is just so distinct that I immediately recognized it. But at that age, I was still barely aware of the whole concept of actors and roles, so I was understandably confused. I looked at my mom quizically and my parents both starting cracking up. And even then I was able to suss out they had just trolled the shit out of me.
And even now, while I can recognize it as a great performance, I can't help but giggle a little inside whenever I see Kruge.
For the kiddies who saw BTTF first, that's what most people would have associated him with when TSFS came out in 1984.I alway hear Reverend Jim from Taxi.
Wow, I never got that as his motivation at all. I always took it as very similar to Kor in "Errand of Mercy" in TOS, where they needed Genesis to build planets due to lack of resources. I mean, Kruge also saw it as a weapon, but I didn't that it was just conflict for the sake of destroying freedom and peace.Here, the Federation good guys (U.S.) against the Klingon bad guy (Soviet bad guy) who wants to acquire a new powerful weapon to destroy freedom and peace. It wasn't using the Cold War allegory to make any interesting examination of the conflict or bring up any interesting questions. It was just feeding into a jingoistic narrative that was popular in mainstream America at the time. I still enjoy the movie but the villain and his goal is very pedestrian.
IDK - Kang in TOS S3 "Day of the Dove" was IMMEDIATELY threatening (IMO):I get that the Klingons were the Soviets. There's even a Bloom County or Outland strip where the characters lament the Cold War's over, there's no more bad guys, and now Klingon's are serving in Starfleet. But I don't think it's the perfect Star Trek villain for the time, but definitely the perfect villain for a mainstream action/sci-fi movie. Soviet villains were everywhere in the 80s. Here, the Federation good guys (U.S.) against the Klingon bad guy (Soviet bad guy) who wants to acquire a new powerful weapon to destroy freedom and peace. It wasn't using the Cold War allegory to make any interesting examination of the conflict or bring up any interesting questions. It was just feeding into a jingoistic narrative that was popular in mainstream America at the time. I still enjoy the movie but the villain and his goal is very pedestrian.
I'll have to check out DISC for that scene.
When watching TOS for the first time I was a little taken back at how less-threatning and not-as-aggressive they were compared to the way they were portrayed in TNG. They pretty close in looks for the most part, but that whole warrior culture wasn't nearly as defined, and they seemed more like just regular guys in extensive make-up. It's funny seeing that one Klingon ambassador Kamarag arguing to the Federation that Kirk should be brought up on charges. He sounds too much like a regular politician, except he's wearing funny prosthetics. Doesn't come across as a Klingon from the way he speaks. Kruge's henchman, the guy from Nightcourt? Regular sounding dude. Gorkon? A regular British politician, but with prosthetics.
Chang was definitely the standout, but he didn't remind me too much of TNG Klingons. He did however seemed to be of the same stock as the original TOS Klingons, Kor in particular. He had some great lines too. Charming villain is right.
TNG Klingons were great in my opinion. The one from that Riker episode was bad ass when he wasn't getting mopped up by Riker. "Look around you...there are no old warriors." "Would you like something easier?" Great dialogue, delivery, and the guy looked huge.
Kurn was an intimidating dude, even putting his older brother in check initially.
Korris from that first Klingon episode of TNG was great too. He kind of had that classic Klingon swagger from TOS but also that alpha warrior marauder vibe when he's describing to Worf what it means to be Klingon.
Overall, it's interesting to see how Klingons from TOS, film, to TNG was a WIP and how they're identity evolved over time.
From TOS, Kang was the most bad ass, even among the TNG Klingons.
Kor's dialogue was perfection.
IDK - Kang in TOS S3 "Day of the Dove" was IMMEDIATELY threatening (IMO):
(Watch just the first few seconds here
Kang has always been my favorite TOS era Klingon.
Eh. I haven't watched that show since Perrette left, and even by then I was barley watching at all.Christopher Lloyd is coming to NCIS:
https://www.cinemablend.com/televis...ook-at-christopher-lloyds-upcoming-guest-spot
You don't get to tell any of us what is or is not Star trekHello.
I can't be more dissappointed with this new series. I'm 25, i grew up with Star Trek since my parents showed me some VHSs of The Original Series when i was 2. Since then i have loved this incredible world, from The Cage to the last season of Star Trek Enterprise.
The Federation, space exploration idea, the showing of a future in which humans leave in peace, respecting all forms of Life, aspiring to be better persons and know the universe we are surrounded by, surpassing racism, arrogance, hate, war... has always inspired me, i still think that Will happen in the future.
The epic adventure, wether were moral based episodes or spac battles, unforgettable friendships like Kirk-Spock , Bashir-O'Brien or Archer-T'pol are amazing, all is gone in this new "Star Trek".
Since Enterprise ended, the new Star Trek is not real. I didnt like JJ Abrahams movies , i didnt like Disco and i dont like Picard. Picard is one of my favourite characters ever and i was hoping Mr. Stewart would never join a show like this.
Gore violence, the Federation putting self interests above saving an entire race, 24th Century totally opposite to what It was in TNG era, pathetic dialogue, Romulans that speak and look like humans, , just but the ears...characters speaking like teenagers. There is no space exploration, no moral dilema, no feeling, no soul.
I dont know how i could stand first 4 episodes, but the (SPOILER ALERT) Icheb scene in the fifth is the end of this hopeless try.
I see a lot of people that seem to like this show, i respect all opinions, but please, how people that cried with Spock's death, when the Enterprise appeared 10 years later in TMP, when Kirk said:
"Second Star to the right" and the Enterprise A headed to the Star for its last asventure can enjoy this. I dont know that the hell is happening with people, with a lot of Star Trek fans...
I dont know what more to say, i just hope Star Trek one day will make the difference again.
Star Trek 2009 is not Star Trek.
Star Trek Into Darkness is not Star Trek
Star Trek Beyond is not Star Trek
Star Trek Discovery is not Star Trek
Star Trek Picard is not Star Trek
This is just my personal opinion, i dont want to start any discussion or ofend anyone.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.