Maybe it's about killing cats?
Maybe it's about killing cats?
Yeah I don't have any background on why exactly the producers chose the name "Galaxy" for the title of the show. But I think it's a better guess than insinuating it just as well could have been called Star Trek: Glenn.
I guess big studios dealing with a multi-million dollar franchise just pick names at random without any thought of the marketing, significant, relevance, etc.
This isn't the topic to discus discovery, but it has violated prior canon far too many times. It is not just a general lack of the feel Gene was going for, but ignoring prior canon. Reboots can do that, but canon following extensions cannot.There was a time when TNG was considered 'not star trek'
Discovery is Star Trek. It's just Star Trek that you don't like. There were plenty of examples of the Discovery crew 'being better', the entire final episode is about them preventing the Federation from committing an act of genocide. And before you say that the Federation of TNG would never do that, Starfleet put Picard under orders to use the virus that was proposed to be used on Hugh to wipe out the collective when the opportunity next presented itself.
You don't have to like Discovery, and I certainly don't think Discovery is perfect, but to claim that it is somehow not Star Trek when it's done nothing that other series haven't done is ridiculous.
You've never actually watched Star Trek have you?This isn't the topic to discus discovery, but it has violated prior canon far too many times. It is not just a general lack of the feel Gene was going for, but ignoring prior canon. Reboots can do that, but canon following extensions cannot.
And is showing it's age.Great Brophy's eyeballs, this thread is hitting 50 pages.
Come on, they and us live for rationalizations!I have my issues with DSC and continuity but at least it references lots of TOS Era and ENT Era minutae. No Trek series has avoided screwing up continuity and making it embarrassing for the Encyclopedia and Chronology writers to have to rationalize away and correct those mistakes so that it all more or less lines up.
The Ent MU episodes were some of the coolest Trek episodes in the franchise and were far from irrelevant or pointless. You are probably thinking this because they had no relationship to the Ent PU. That was by design, and is part of what made the Ent MU unique in ways that TNG, DS9, and even DSC, could only dream of.ENT's was fine, I guess, but it was completely irrelevant and pointless. It literally only existed to let the cast all be evil for an episode. It was like the network just picked a random fanfic and filmed that instead of coming up with a story that actually fit in the show.
Koon-ut-kal-if-fee!I just head canon'ed this forum away as a Pon Farr fever dream.![]()
This isn't the topic to discus discovery, but it has violated prior canon far too many times.
It is not just a general lack of the feel Gene was going for,
but ignoring prior canon. Reboots can do that, but canon following extensions cannot.
They tend to chose names that have a historical or at times a personal significance. The Enterprise was called the Yorktown in early drafts of TOS.
Quite right.This isn't the topic to discus discovery
We did?
There were?
Good that you mentioned The Inner Light. One would imagine a show about Picard would be something along those lines. Exploring the historical, psychological, even spiritual dimensions of the character and of his influence. Inner Light was a good "Picard" episode. This show on the other hand is dealing with a myriad of different things, with Picard being almost a supporting role in his "own show".
I'd say he's off course by hundreds of light years.
Probably just a personal preference.Hey, did anybody ever say how they ended up changing it? Enterprise (CV-6) had a much better career than Yorktown (CV-5). I suppose it could have been that simple.
Nope, TOS, It was enhanced in TNG, but it was there in TOS.The whole utopia thing didn’t start until TNG. So that’s fine.
I have watched TOS on repeat for years. TNG to a lesser extent. As Picard draws from TNG except for a few things, I think I have some knowledge about Star Trek. I have literally been watching it my whole life.You've never actually watched Star Trek have you?![]()
To some extent yes, but it has always been little things. The sort of things they get wrong making movies. There are plenty of examples of where a film or episode has violated its own canon. But Discovery has taken that to a new level. Again, not the place to discus it.Every Star Trek series has ignored prior canon, some have even ignore their own canon, Do you consider Enterprise Star Trek? Because all the accusations you are throwing Discovery's way were also hurled at Enterprise
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.