• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek Picard is not Star Trek

Yeah I don't have any background on why exactly the producers chose the name "Galaxy" for the title of the show. But I think it's a better guess than insinuating it just as well could have been called Star Trek: Glenn.
I guess big studios dealing with a multi-million dollar franchise just pick names at random without any thought of the marketing, significant, relevance, etc.

That's a pretty well-executed dodge. But a dodge nonetheless.
 
There was a time when TNG was considered 'not star trek'

Discovery is Star Trek. It's just Star Trek that you don't like. There were plenty of examples of the Discovery crew 'being better', the entire final episode is about them preventing the Federation from committing an act of genocide. And before you say that the Federation of TNG would never do that, Starfleet put Picard under orders to use the virus that was proposed to be used on Hugh to wipe out the collective when the opportunity next presented itself.

You don't have to like Discovery, and I certainly don't think Discovery is perfect, but to claim that it is somehow not Star Trek when it's done nothing that other series haven't done is ridiculous.
This isn't the topic to discus discovery, but it has violated prior canon far too many times. It is not just a general lack of the feel Gene was going for, but ignoring prior canon. Reboots can do that, but canon following extensions cannot.
 
I have my issues with DSC and continuity but at least it references lots of TOS Era and ENT Era minutae. No Trek series has avoided screwing up continuity and making it embarrassing for the Encyclopedia and Chronology writers to have to rationalize away and correct those mistakes so that it all more or less lines up.
 
I have my issues with DSC and continuity but at least it references lots of TOS Era and ENT Era minutae. No Trek series has avoided screwing up continuity and making it embarrassing for the Encyclopedia and Chronology writers to have to rationalize away and correct those mistakes so that it all more or less lines up.
Come on, they and us live for rationalizations! :p
 
ENT's was fine, I guess, but it was completely irrelevant and pointless. It literally only existed to let the cast all be evil for an episode. It was like the network just picked a random fanfic and filmed that instead of coming up with a story that actually fit in the show.
The Ent MU episodes were some of the coolest Trek episodes in the franchise and were far from irrelevant or pointless. You are probably thinking this because they had no relationship to the Ent PU. That was by design, and is part of what made the Ent MU unique in ways that TNG, DS9, and even DSC, could only dream of.

Ent even changed up the opening credits and music. The MU episodes were going to have their own storylines. In almost every way, it was meant to stand on it’s own as a completely separate show. Manny Coro was quoted saying that they had no intention of ever crossing the MU episodes with Ent’s PU.
 
Last edited:
"In A Mirror Darkly, Parts I and II(ENT)" were not only a sequel to "The Tholian Web(TOS)" but a prequel to both the TOS and DS9 Mirror Universe episodes as well as DSC's Mirror Universe arc. That storyline weaves together no fewer than four of the eight existing Trek series.
 
This isn't the topic to discus discovery, but it has violated prior canon far too many times.

How?

It is not just a general lack of the feel Gene was going for,

What does this even mean? What feel was Gene going for?

but ignoring prior canon. Reboots can do that, but canon following extensions cannot.

Every Star Trek series has ignored prior canon, some have even ignore their own canon, Do you consider Enterprise Star Trek? Because all the accusations you are throwing Discovery's way were also hurled at Enterprise
 
They tend to chose names that have a historical or at times a personal significance. The Enterprise was called the Yorktown in early drafts of TOS.

Hey, did anybody ever say how they ended up changing it? Enterprise (CV-6) had a much better career than Yorktown (CV-5). I suppose it could have been that simple.
 

Wrath of Khan, Conspiracy, and more. But this is a product of the difference between TV in 1990 and TV in 2020. We saw blood in TOS and many other things here and there. This series isn't exactly full of it.

There were?

Yeah, there have been dark episodes. And I haven't even seen most of DS9, Voyager, or Enterprise. And the Children Shall Lead was certainly dark. So was Miri. TNG less so. But we had conspiracies in TNG and DS9 and some pretty twisted scientists in TOS.

Good that you mentioned The Inner Light. One would imagine a show about Picard would be something along those lines. Exploring the historical, psychological, even spiritual dimensions of the character and of his influence. Inner Light was a good "Picard" episode. This show on the other hand is dealing with a myriad of different things, with Picard being almost a supporting role in his "own show".

I disagree. The Inner Light was a probe and it found the perfect host in Picard. This show is exploring the real Picard. The one who would resign if the Federation and Star Fleet abandoned a rescue he felt was right. This show is all about Picard and his ideals. The very ideas Gene wrote into the character. Sure, the stories are darker and they are exploring corners of the Federation we have not seen. Refugee worlds. The Romulan Diaspora. But Picard has hired two Rumulans. He is friends with Romulans. He has followed Spock's dream and extended his hand to them. And this story is about following Data's trail. Data dreamed of more like himself and he would have been sad at what they produced and how many and how they used them. This is exploring a lot of things that the Federation got wrong. Not the first time. There is a list of times the Federation got it wrong and changed course.

I'd say he's off course by hundreds of light years.

I don't see how. Absolutely everything he has done is totally in keeping with his character and the ideas I expected to see. Sure some things in the Federation are not quite right (not the first time) and there is an undercover enemy at work (again, not the first time) and they are in the seedy underbelly of the frinnges of the Federation (that is the first time, though we have met many individuals from this realm, like Mudd, Jones, and quite a later.
 
You've never actually watched Star Trek have you? :guffaw:
I have watched TOS on repeat for years. TNG to a lesser extent. As Picard draws from TNG except for a few things, I think I have some knowledge about Star Trek. I have literally been watching it my whole life.
 
Every Star Trek series has ignored prior canon, some have even ignore their own canon, Do you consider Enterprise Star Trek? Because all the accusations you are throwing Discovery's way were also hurled at Enterprise
To some extent yes, but it has always been little things. The sort of things they get wrong making movies. There are plenty of examples of where a film or episode has violated its own canon. But Discovery has taken that to a new level. Again, not the place to discus it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top