Toilet humor is childish, but I couldn't resist. Is Qapla' acceptable in lieu of merde?If it made Dumbcock's head explode, I'd be all for toilets of the future. Stewart might even drop an m-bomb ("merde!").
Toilet humor is childish, but I couldn't resist. Is Qapla' acceptable in lieu of merde?If it made Dumbcock's head explode, I'd be all for toilets of the future. Stewart might even drop an m-bomb ("merde!").
"Next time on Star Trek: Lavatory..."I think that'll require a short Trek at least. They could make it into a potty training thing for little kids.
Perhaps the Nickelodeon series will skew toward really young children?"Next time on Star Trek: Lavatory..."
It's surprising that sophisticated ST fans didn't get that she was speaking allegorically. Chateau Picard was a refuge and a place of safety and she had no such place. It's was basically to guilt trip Picard and remind him that he emotionally abandoned her when she needed him.
They weren't that common on TOS, or the Federation and the Klingons wouldn't constantly be competing for them.
Specifically, Hugh said these were the only Romulans to be assimilated that he personally knew of - a get-out clause for the writers there, especially given how long it has been since Hugh left the Collective.I think the writers forgot that. They explicitly said "These are the only Romulans ever assimilated".
You're confusing power projection with necessity. Why did Europeans colonize remote areas of the world with a handful of colonist? To make them look good. That's why the plot of STWok doesn't make sense. Why would a well organized utopia need something as desperate as the Genesis Device unless it really was a weapon (Starfleet did fund it)
Me, I think paradise is a fairly subjective concept. Depends a lot on whose eyes you are looking through and what you are comparing it with."You look out the window of Starfleet Headquarters and you see paradise. It's easy to be a saint in paradise, but the Maquis do not live in paradise. ... "
Does Paradise = Perfect Utopia?
Huh? "Make them look good."????You're confusing power projection with necessity. Why did Europeans colonize remote areas of the world with a handful of colonist? To make them look good. That's why the plot of STWok doesn't make sense. Why would a well organized utopia need something as desperate as the Genesis Device unless it really was a weapon (Starfleet did fund it)
"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - Douglas Adams.
You're confusing power projection with necessity. Why did Europeans colonize remote areas of the world with a handful of colonist? To make them look good. That's why the plot of STWok doesn't make sense. Why would a well organized utopia need something as desperate as the Genesis Device unless it really was a weapon (Starfleet did fund it)
I do not
I am still waiting for people to use the toilets in Star Trek or to have their existence acknowledged
I don't know, kind of seemed it did.Raffi's bitterness reflects how her fallback position did not involve seclusion to an idyllic location where she could pursue pastoral pastimes in seclusion from the slowly decaying social values.
Because They can?You're confusing power projection with necessity. Why did Europeans colonize remote areas of the world with a handful of colonist? To make them look good. That's why the plot of STWok doesn't make sense. Why would a well organized utopia need something as desperate as the Genesis Device unless it really was a weapon (Starfleet did fund it)
I imagine it's not so much what the software can do, as to how much actual physical materials one has to make stuff.As far as Raffi technically not starving (and therefore technically not being poor to preserve TNG's lines that poverty was eradicated), we do know that Dahj's replicator menu was described as "tragic". I can only wonder what Raffi's replicator menu was limited to.
1. munchiesAs far as Raffi technically not starving (and therefore technically not being poor to preserve TNG's lines that poverty was eradicated), we do know that Dahj's replicator menu was described as "tragic". I can only wonder what Raffi's replicator menu was limited to.
Do you really want to see a scene with someone talking to Picard while he's sitting on the toilet taking a dump?
Or maybe Picard walks in on Riker doing the same.
5. Del Taco4. DEW
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.