By name only. Control in the novels is way more interesting.I can only think of CONTROL![]()
By name only. Control in the novels is way more interesting.I can only think of CONTROL![]()
In short, even in this conservative century, people hook up all the time, at the drop of a hat-- especially hormone-driven young people.Frankly it all depends on your personal experience. There are people who will forever have difficulty attracting a sexual partner, and then there are people that for almost their entire life can hook up all the time. Just like there are some people who are better at finding a long term partner, then a casual hookup, and people who are great at casual hookup who have a terrible time finding a long term partner, and of course every combination in-between. I know that if I wanted even in my 50's I could meet and hook up with some one, today. As for the MeToo movement, well here is some easy advise that helps with the vast majority of situations. Don't hook up when you or the other person is drinking or using drugs. Make sure its not someone who feels you are in a position of power over (ie don't hook up with people you work with, or who interact with your job), make sure the other person is on the same page with you. If this is something you aren't great at, then once you've made contact, let the other person be in the driver's seat, so that they are the ones to initiate anything, putting you in the position to say no, if anything crosses the line. And just to let you know, this is what I was told when I was 18 back in 1985 in a terribly uncomfortable conversation with my Dad. The rule about drinking and drugs wasn't so much about consent at that time, but was so I wouldn't be careless about protection thanks to HIV.
As for how common it is, it might be a lot more common than you think. Technology has certainly made it easier, as there are apps on phones that will literally ping the people near you who are interested in just hooking up.
As for Trek, well even going back to the 60's we had Kirk putting his shoes on in episode, which was to imply he just had relations with an "alien" guest star of the week. In Star Trek Beyond in the opener, we see what looks like a pretty sudden pull my into your quarters scene, and a I am throwing you out of my quarters before your clothes are even on, which both imply fairly casual attitudes to sex. And we certainly have seen characters on TNG and DS9 imply fairly quick sexual interaction in the span of an episode. How long did it take Harry from having sex in Disease, after he meet the women? In Into Darkness Kirk is frolicking around with two women, I assume he isn't polyamorous, and this was a hook up, not a relationship with multiple partners. Heck on TNG we saw a younger crewman enjoying time with Troi (when she was under the influence, but he wasn't). In Conundrum when everyone has lost their memories, it is strongly implied that Riker and Ro hooked up almost immediately. So Trek certainly as hinted that this does happen.
Oh and just to point out we actually don't know how long it was from when they meet to when they hooked up. It could have been that night, it could be days. We can't assume just because we see time flow at a certain pace on Earth with Picard, that a similar time span is happening with the Romulans. Clearly that's the case because we see two scenes with Picard intercutting when they appear at different times, in different locations.
that was always the case. the morally doubtful starfleet personel of the week is a tried trope dating all the way back to TOSthis show seems intent on portraying Picard as an outlier,the only moral man in a universe of bastardry.
But that doesn’t make sense either, especially when you consider the Enterprise Season 4 trilogy with the robotic ships controlled by the Aenar . Sure by TNG that was 200 years in the past (and written well after “Thd Defector”) but it still gives the Romulans cybernetics and robotics technology.Jarok was probably trying to get a response from Data aka he lied. Romulans do lie.
It took my second watch through to realize Soji’s new co-worker was a trill. Her spots are really hard to see.
Man this was good. That scene with the admiral was awesome. I hope Picard doesn't loosen his ideals though.
Her name will be revealed as a Dax next week![]()
I find I still mostly* agree with him. This was absolutely a 2.5 star episode – a lot of good scenes, but no overall cohesion or narrative drive. It's table setting for what will hopefully be real stories down the line.
*I would give Remembrance 3.5 instead of the 3 he gives it, but he's right that the pilot was a stronger episode than this one.
I generally find him to be too harsh on episodes that are setting things up. I believe he's harsher on them now than he was in 1999 with DS9's "Penumbra", "'Til Death Do Us Part", and "Strange Bedfellows". I think there's some bias on his part. I feel "Maps and Symbols" is better than two-and-a-half stars. 2.5 stars is what I think of as "middle of the road". I gave it an 8/10, which would be the equivalent of 3 stars. It got me more interested in the "world" of 2399. "Middle of the road" doesn't get me more interested in anything.Wow, I love Jammer's reviews. And he nailed it with this episode.
I do declare that is a witticism that I do not get.
Until tomorrow, geniuses, LLAP!![]()
I'm dense. I didn't notice that or the spots![]()
Interestingly, many of the posters there see Picard having similarities with Disco, although unlike myself, they aren't pleased about that being so and complaints about CSI styling does seem to be rampant. And there's also a lot of dislike over at IGN. Looks like it's going to take some continued heavy lifting for even Patrick Stewart to carry fandom into the 2020s.
But you can build nuclear power plants and still ban nuclear weapons. The fissile fuel each requires is different in terms of % U-235 or Pu-239. That's what the Iran nuclear deal was all about -- they could process up to the purity for nuclear power plants, but no more.
No respectable physicist actually thought that the Earth would be destroyed. ...
It doesn't fit. In Into Darkness the Klingons are an unknown threat, in Disco they've just had a massive war.
Sure you can, but that hasn't happened. The USA shredded a nuclear arms treaty with Russia and also the Iranian Nuclear deal … both within, what? the past 2 years. Despite that new nuclear power plants are still being built. Granted some are "cleaner" than others.
Exactly my point, thank you! Reason and rationality was prevalent , won the day, and won it handily. They didn't let fear stop them. Fear is the antithesis of science.
Wow, I love Jammer's reviews. And he nailed it with this episode.
My thoughts on episode two:
The scenes with the Commodore made me shake my head. Please don't tell me we're going to do more Section 31/shady spy BS in Star Trek. I can accept Starfleet Intelligence existing, but in this future where humanity is always portrayed as wanting for nothing and wanting peace over conflict, what is the impetus for having an organization that is doing more than intelligence gathering? Also, Section 31 has always been lazy writing with base level shadowy characters that are portrayed as doing "whatever it takes" and the main characters having to save the day with ideals. This worked once, maybe because William Sadler is such an awesome actor, but each with use subsequent use, the returns have diminished. I will be frustrated if we go down this route.
Why did the Commodore have to be a Vulcan? If we are having characters doing shady things that doesn't jive with Vulcan ideals, especially the IDIC on her desk. I don't think any series has done the Vulcans right outside of Spock and Tuvok.
The whole Lieutenant Rizzo storyline has tipped their hand too early in my opinion. We weren't sure what Narek was up to. Most of us figured it was no good, but to lock that in so early could be an unfortunate misstep depending on where they go with it. In the meantime, it kills any mystery of his story line.
The use of swearing seems to have a lot of people on social media wound up with some declaring this "wasn't their Trek." First off, "isn't my" is the most overused and tiresome BS on social media today. Secondly, I was fine with it. Trek has always promoted humanity as being perfect or as close to perfect as one can get, but people also get frustrated and angry. The new mediums that bring us Trek have allowed this kind of language to be used and frankly it makes them seem more human.
The scenes of Picard and Laris piecing together the scene of the crime could've been better served with lighter technobabble. Another kernel of lazy writing is layering on words that don't mean anything to the viewer. Using a metaphor to explain what is going on would be helpful.
One thing I was happy to see in this episode was the continued strong universe-building. Having seen where Discovery season three is going with a future where the Federation has fallen, you can theoretically begin to see the cracks here when Clancy comments that eighteen members almost left over helping the Romulans. All empires fall and it is amazing to see the two series in a kind of lock step to grow the universe.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.