Wrong again; their own properties were struggling--again, needing a film adaptation to pull them back from financial collapse, which is one of the reasons Marvel tried to aggressively license its properties to film studios in the 70s (with Lee as the point man trying to shop characters to studios big and small) but there rests the truth of Marvel's problems, as in the specific case of the FF, it was not relevant as a whole property to the film industry, either. In the mid 70s, when Frank Price--the Senior VP of Universal/MCA-TV--optioned a few Marvel characters (most notably the one jewel in the form of the Hulk), they obtained the Human Torch, but separated him from the rest of the FF concept and wanted to develop that as a pilot--a solo act. That was not greenlit, but it had nothing to do with myths of FX practicality, budget or anything else, but whatever appeal Price believed that one FF character had. Speaks volumes.
Next, the FF's only non-comic media presence in that decade was the abysmal DePatie–Freleng Enterprises cartoon from 1978, which was considered unappealing to anyone who might be familiar with the comic's heydays and/or general young audiences (the opposite effect of Hanna-Barbera's adaptation from 1967-68). No shock that it was quickly cancelled mid-season after only 13 episodes. It lacked the heart of what placed the FF on the map as a major comic creation (in the 1960s), much like what was happening to comic at that time. There was never any quality/appeal consistency with the FF after the 60s a problem that was shared by many Marvel titles in the 70s--the late 70s in particular.
So, you can believe whatever you want, but as far as the MCU is concerned, the FF would be best served not following the failures of four previous FF films set in contemporary times and branch off on their own. They do not need to be shoehorned into the already congested MCU. Once again, an origin story set in the past certainly worked in Wonder Woman and Captain America: The First Avenger. No one in their right mind would ever argue against those examples.
On topic, thankfully, Spider-Man is no longer a part of the MCU, and with hope, the plots will return to the kind of action/drama-cum-character studies that turned the character into a phenomenon in the mid 60s.
- Still waiting for you to show how I 'marginalized' any aspect of the FF in the 1960ies. (Which you left out from your quoting of my previous post above.
- Also, I wasn't trying to make a comment about the quality of the shows that were produced - just that MARVEL got PAID for the licensing. (Your point was they were almost bankrupt - my point weas the POPULARITY of the FF allowed them to license said property and get some money.)
- Lastly, PLEASE show me anything I posted claiming the MCU version of teh FF should follow after ANY of the previous THREE films (I don't count the Roger Corman 1990ies version as an actual attempt, although the version of Doctor Doom was mildly interesting). My ONE point is that I believe Feige and Co. COULD do a very good version of the FF for the MCU, and I'd LOVE to see their take <-- And that's all I've ever said in that subject - IDK where you gleaned I thought the earlier iterations of the FF films were something they should emulate for the MCU version as I've not said ANYTHING like that.