What are you talking about?
ANY agreement is LAID OUT in a written contract with clauses specifying what is allowed, which side is responsible for, and which side gets what monies. Given there is NO FURTHER AGREEMENT - I'd say Sony has whatever was considered part of the "Spiderman Pantheon" (my term, who knows how it's described in the actual contract) under whatever film licencing agreement they had in place prior to the (now defunct and no longer in place) SONY/MCU 'sharing agreement.
SONY has "Spiderman" pursuant to whatever their previous licensing contract (still in force because if it wasn't, Disney would HAVE the character to use as they please.)
It's clear Disney was banking on/ and hoping they could continue and hammer out another 'sharing' agreement, but since they didn't, you can be sure they will hold Sony to whatever the original agreement Sony had with Marvel to use the "Spiderman Pantheon" and if Sony violates anything Disney/Marvel WOULD pounce to reclaim the character.
I'm talking common sense.
If two companies do a contract to share and cross over characters - NO chance in hell that they leave out the part what happens after their collaboration is finished!
So OF COURSE their contract for homecoming/FFH specifies weather or not this Spider-Man is allowed to namedrop Stark or the avengers after the contract is over. Leaving that part out would be ludicrous!
That's billion dollar companies. Not amateur writers and armchair lawyers. They have professional lawyers to put in safeguards so that no-one side gets completely screwed over once the contract is finished. Where the hell did you get the idea they would have to revert back to the state before they ever talked in the first place? They have shared property! Of course they have a common sense divorce contract in place!