Sorry. His ax had a similar power. in fact, it seems to have all the same powers except the worthiness clause.There was no hammer in Infinity War.
So if they were going to go that route for a movie, would we probably end up with different actresses playing Jane and Thor then? I wonder if Natalie Portman would be willing to come back if she was the human half of Thor?In the comics the hammer can transform people. Thor at one time was the handicapped Don Blake and Jane Foster in her human form was suffering from cancer.
Or CGI.So if they were going to go that route for a movie, would we probably end up with different actresses playing Jane and Thor then? I wonder if Natalie Portman would be willing to come back if she was the human half of Thor?
Or the Hulk.Kind of like what the did with Chris Evans in the first Captain America?
They were hurt by making bad movies.Was the film series ultimately hurt by having way too loose an approach to continuity? Or (just) that too many films in a row seemed like they were each trying to be (The New) The Last Movie, one Finale after another? Are those factors pretty related or not?
Was the film series ultimately hurt by having way too loose an approach to continuity? Or (just) that too many films in a row seemed like they were each trying to be (The New) The Last Movie, one Finale after another? Are those factors pretty related or not?
I think Apocalypse, a movie I consider okay, was the big strikeout. After sidelining Magneto, whose ascent was teased in First Class' final scene, in favor of the DoFP crossover, and then ending that movie promising his ascent again, to then sideline him again in favor of some random blue baddie was a huge mistake. The third First Class movie should have been Xavier scrambling to put together a team to combat a rising Magneto. Instead, it half-assedly introduced a new team, but didn't ask us to really invest in them. So now we get a final movie built around a character the general public barely knows, and doesn't care about. Not a great plan...Was the film series ultimately hurt by having way too loose an approach to continuity? Or (just) that too many films in a row seemed like they were each trying to be (The New) The Last Movie, one Finale after another? Are those factors pretty related or not?
There weren't that many last movies. And one of them was Logan, which was 'the last Wolverine movie', not 'the last X-Men movie'.
Except it revealed that every single X-Men would die, and that as a concept the X-Men failed because their leader had magic bullshit powers that could randomly kill every X-Men because...reasons.
Not really. We don't know exactly what happened. The news reports that the dead included 'some' of the X-men. Remember that Scott, Jean, and Storm would be about 60 by this point, and the Beast possibly 75+ so it isn't clear who those X-men might have been. In the Gifted, they confirm that the X-men at that time are 'missing'.Except it revealed that every single X-Men would die, and that as a concept the X-Men failed because their leader had magic bullshit powers that could randomly kill every X-Men because...reasons. I'd say killing off every X-Men character simultaneously while also eliminating mutants with magic food is pretty definitively an ending, which is why I never counted Logan as being in continuity because there is no way, if FOX had kept going, that they would have had all the X-Men die like they did in Logan, even if they kept making X-Men films for decades.
They clearly had a plan for the first trilogy (Jean's transformation being triggered by Magneto's machine in X1) but then they dropped the ball by featuring dozens of characters from the comics in cameos and disintegrating them in X3. WTF? I'm not sure why they went with the notion of giving Jean a split personality before her power up. It was enough in the comics to explain that power corrupts. It corrupted Kelly's body, it could have corrupted Jean's mind and saved us some dialogue.Was the film series ultimately hurt by having way too loose an approach to continuity? Or (just) that too many films in a row seemed like they were each trying to be (The New) The Last Movie, one Finale after another? Are those factors pretty related or not?
Except it revealed that every single X-Men would die
I never counted Logan as being in continuity because there is no way, if FOX had kept going, that they would have had all the X-Men die like they did in Logan, even if they kept making X-Men films for decades.
One doesn't have to dislike Logan's bleakness to view it as out of the main continuity: Logan says no new mutants have been born in 25 years, but there are children mutants in the happy DoFP future coda which takes place just a few yeas prior.Fox made the movie. You're just in denial.
Nah, that would have been putting a band-aid on a case of leukemia.I have to wonder if cutting the mall scene from Apocalypse was a mistake, even if it didn't move the Apocalypse plot forward, it might have at least given the new characters some more development.
I viewed it as a slight variation on the Onslaught story. Essex Corporation is run by Mister Sinister. There's a whole agenda there we're not seeing. It's not like him to squander good genetic material.One doesn't have to dislike Logan's bleakness to view it as out of the main continuity: Logan says no new mutants have been born in 25 years, but there are children mutants in the happy DoFP future coda which takes place just a few yeas prior.
Nah, that would have been putting a band-aid on a case of leukemia.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.