I'm surprised Johnathan Lane hasn't started a "Alec Peters Legal Defense" on any crowdfund platform yet.Awwwwwwwww poor Alec when the walls fell..........
I'm surprised Johnathan Lane hasn't started a "Alec Peters Legal Defense" on any crowdfund platform yet.Awwwwwwwww poor Alec when the walls fell..........
Still 30 days... I think this joke has run it's course...
Well God know what they really spend the Patreon and YouTube money on..........not like there's any oversight there.I'm surprised Johnathan Lane hasn't started a "Alec Peters Legal Defense" on any crowdfund platform yet.
Of course we do...Sushi, Union Fees for Alec Peters, and Tires.Well God know what they really spend the Patreon and YouTube money on..........not like there's any oversight there.
He tried something like that once.I'm surprised Johnathan Lane hasn't started a "Alec Peters Legal Defense" on any crowdfund platform yet.
Actually Lane is a fairly okay guy when it doesn't concern AP. I guess he can't see that all goes away when he stumps for that guy. So I have to ask. What exactly was in that sushi?He tried something like that once.
"Klingon aphrodisiacs?"Actually Lane is a fairly okay guy when it doesn't concern AP. I guess he can't see that all goes away when he stumps for that guy. So I have to ask. What exactly was in that sushi?
I'm into oysters and kamikaze myself."Klingon aphrodisiacs?"
Two points about the first new case.
1) Peters owes $26,000 in attorneys fees? After this long!? Why hasn't said attorney not chased after this?
2) Does the purchasing of the DeBord judgement by Armstrong means she essentially paid him what he was owed to chase it in court herself?
^^^My non legal trained mind is confused!![]()
I'm not familiar with this one. Who are DeBord and Armstrong?Does the purchasing of the DeBord judgement by Armstrong means she essentially paid him what he was owed to chase it in court herself?
Jonathan Lane's Interlude fan-film is to cost nearly $19,000 to make:
https://fanfilmfactor.com/2019/05/17/my-star-trek-fan-film-is-going-to-cost-how-much/
Did he forget the Third Rule of Acquisition??"It costs what it costs. People will accept that."
In AxaMonitor Daily's late edition May 15:
Two new fronts have opened in Axanar producer Alec Peters’ legal wars. Legal papers filed this week in Nevada and Iowa feature a couple old names you’ll recognize as Peters’ legal bluster against former Axanar director Robert Meyer Burnett may be backfiring on him.
These new cases — backed up by actual evidence filed in court, unlike Peters’ claims against Burnett — threaten Peters with tens of thousands in damages. He may even lose some of his vaunted props collection. Read the preview, or sign up for AxaMonitor Daily.
![]()
Yes. Judgments are a species of investment. You can sell 'em. You can sell settlements, too. So, say you were granted $10,000,000 over the course of 40 years (e. g. $250,000 per year without going into interest -- I won't so as to simplify matters). There are plenty of people who need/want cash now. They may have a disabled child cor spouse who needs care for the rest of their days, which is often why settlements like that are stretched out for decades. Of course it also makes them far more affordable to the defendant(s).Welcome to Civil tort law (it's why Civil Attorney's try like hell to ONLY take cases they believe are winnable and make agreements to take their fees from the Judgement). However attorney's will weigh whether time spent in pursuing said fees will be worth it as opposed to just moving on to another case with a better chance of ROI.
It means: She gave the person who has the Judgement (in Civil cases the Plaintiff may indeed receive a Judgement, but it's up to the Plaintiff to 'collect' IE said Plaintiff can now legally file garnishments/liens, etc; but that takes time and more money to FIND sources of income to garnish, properties to file liens against, etc.) a lump sum of money (some percentage of said Judgement); and now she has full rights to go after the whole thing.
^^^
Yeah, the collection side is something most TV shows/films don't get into because it would make the ending depressing. Yes, he/she received a multi-million dollar judgement; but were they to show how it usually plays out, an entity who has the Judgement suddenly declares bankruptcy, or has been liquidating assets all through the proceedings and has nothing left to garnish, or put a lien against and starts doing everything in cash, etc.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.