Yep - and he has a spectacular voice too!
(Somehow, more relevant to this thread that many other posts...)
(Somehow, more relevant to this thread that many other posts...)
Compressing Space Time into an Hour Glass
- Thread starter Dryson
- Start date
If Einsteins theories break down inside of black hole then we can assume that black holes prior to the Big Bang could have existed in Singularity. A singularity that could have pulled matter from space fields to account for its dense matter.
When other fields of space interacted with the black hole however the interaction could have created a release of energy that was then flung outwards in different directions.
When other fields of space interacted with the black hole however the interaction could have created a release of energy that was then flung outwards in different directions.
Negative energy discussion at 7:35 of the video.
If we think of a black hole as being both positive and negative energy, positive being a star that once provided radiant light and gravity as well as elements that then collapsed into a black hole to become negative energy or the star that instead of providing radiant light, gravity and elements consumed all energy around it, even zero point energy of space we can potentially see how massive a black hole can become. Zero point energy trapped during the collapse of a stars core is compressed into a singularity. Zero Point Energy then pops into and out of existence at such a high rate in a confined area that the location of ZPE no longer travels through space but would exist in the same location without ever changing its location.
Since Einsteins laws of physics breakdown inside of the black hole then the space inside of the black hole is part of another set of physics that has not yet been discovered.
Since Einsteins laws of physics can't predict what is taking place in the center of a black hole, then a black hole could theoretically exist prior to the Big Bang. A black hole wouldn't need a star to exist, it would only need ZPE particles. If ZPE existed prior to the Big Bang and generated its own gravity, or pushing and pulling other particles relative to the ZPE popping in and out of existence, crap...I lost track but found something else.
Instead of the particles popping in and out of existence by colliding with each other would space time expand outwards around two Quantum particles that became parallel to each other, like the plates of Lamoreaux machine, due to the other particles popping in and out of existence and possibly forcing two particles to become parallel to one another instead of colliding?
Changing the shape of space would involve changing the arc of collision between two Quantum particles so that they parallel each other as they emerge from their state of non-existence into existence.
Professor,
I recently watched the documentary where you discussed negative energy. The part that discusses Zero Point energy and particles popping in and out of existence created an excitation field after I watched the part about how you made negative energy with your machine.
Instead of the particles popping in and out of existence by colliding with each other would space time expand outwards around two Quantum particles that became parallel to each other, like the plates of your machine, due to the other particles popping in and out of existence and possibly forcing two particles to become parallel to one another instead of colliding?
Changing the shape of space would involve changing the arc of collision between two Quantum particles so that they parallel each other as they emerge from their state of non-existence into existence.
I would also like to suggest that since Einsteins laws of physics breakdown inside of a black hole we can assume that a black hole doesn't need a star in order to form. Therefore prior to the Big Bang black holes could have existed as positive energy black holes, in so much that when pre-big bang matter encountered the black hole a positive release of energy took place instead of all of the matter being consumed by the black hole. Perhaps a large field of negative energy passed through our region and encountered a black hole that created a sudden and tremendous energetic release of energy. The negative energy field could have possibly have triggered other black holes in Primordial Space or pre-Big Bang space that resulted in all of the galaxies in our Universe suddenly becoming alive with energetic reactions.
A black hole is a negative value because it consumes positive energy, other stars, planets, gas, etc. but at one time it was a positive value as it released energy and elements into the Universe.
If we flip the above value then a black hole in Primordial Space would take particles that might not otherwise do anything other than pop in and out of existence and collide or compress them into a sudden release of energy where the release of energy in the form of a star for example would quickly build up mass as the particles came together and were repelled away from the black hole instead of being drawn in and consumed by the black hole.
The Universe always has an equal of opposite values.
While its content is fine, the video is badly edited as is the post, where the content is gobbledygook. Whole lot of warping goin' on?
Let's do the time warp again...
Have you ever heard of the story of Prometheus.
It took more than one hand at the table and not just the hand of Prometheus.
With the first black hole being photographed for the first time I have decided to theorize this:
Since Einsteins theories break down inside of a black hole it is safe to assume that a black hole or numerous black holes could have existed prior to the Big Bang.
The Universe has what are called Equal of Opposites values. A star that once gave life in the form of radiant energy, gravity and elements can became the opposite or a black hole that consumes all forms of energy and elements and light.
The Equal of Opposite value prior to the Big Bang would be a black hole that be the opposite of contemporary black hole in so much that when particles belonging to Pre-Big Bang Zero Point Energy fields interacted with the black hole, matter became super compressed too the point of releasing a tremendous amount of matter that then caused each black hole to change into an opposite value black hole or the center of each galaxy.
Such an interaction could explain why there are so many galaxies in our Universe. Just like the Hand of God sweeping the Pre-Big Bang fields of Zero Point Energy through the Universe that interacted with billions of Pre-Big Bang black holes that created the billions of galaxies in our Universe over a variable time period with the oldest galaxies being affected by the beginning of the wave and the younger galaxies being affected by the trailing aspect of the wave.
Each black hole prior to the Big Bang would have been formed out of different Quantum gravity where the excitation of the particles interacting with the black hole would have generated or created similar results all over the Universe.
Based on how old our galaxy is and finding other galaxies that are the same age as ours, it would be a pretty safe assumption that life does exist in such galaxies.
Be troubled no more, but lift your hearts into the night sky.
It took more than one hand at the table and not just the hand of Prometheus.
With the first black hole being photographed for the first time I have decided to theorize this:
Since Einsteins theories break down inside of a black hole it is safe to assume that a black hole or numerous black holes could have existed prior to the Big Bang.
The Universe has what are called Equal of Opposites values. A star that once gave life in the form of radiant energy, gravity and elements can became the opposite or a black hole that consumes all forms of energy and elements and light.
The Equal of Opposite value prior to the Big Bang would be a black hole that be the opposite of contemporary black hole in so much that when particles belonging to Pre-Big Bang Zero Point Energy fields interacted with the black hole, matter became super compressed too the point of releasing a tremendous amount of matter that then caused each black hole to change into an opposite value black hole or the center of each galaxy.
Such an interaction could explain why there are so many galaxies in our Universe. Just like the Hand of God sweeping the Pre-Big Bang fields of Zero Point Energy through the Universe that interacted with billions of Pre-Big Bang black holes that created the billions of galaxies in our Universe over a variable time period with the oldest galaxies being affected by the beginning of the wave and the younger galaxies being affected by the trailing aspect of the wave.
Each black hole prior to the Big Bang would have been formed out of different Quantum gravity where the excitation of the particles interacting with the black hole would have generated or created similar results all over the Universe.
Based on how old our galaxy is and finding other galaxies that are the same age as ours, it would be a pretty safe assumption that life does exist in such galaxies.
Be troubled no more, but lift your hearts into the night sky.
This is the science and technology thread. Not the Greek Mythology or DC franchise section.
No. You might think it does, and favor that philosophy, but it has no more relevance than looking for the future in tea leaves. That was not an appeal for you to do a thread in this section about the warp travel and loose leaf Irish Breakfast
You were almost coherent until the letter vomit started.
The black hole was also not photographed (but the OP won't be reading this post, apparently); its effects on its local environment were imaged at a wavelength of 1.4mm using very long baseline interferometry.
If the OP wants to have his theories takem seriously, he first needs to adopt the scientic method. It's ok throwing in classical allusions if you want to show off, but you don't mix them in wholesale with your thesis -- best saved for the pop-science book in any case.
If the OP wants to have his theories takem seriously, he first needs to adopt the scientic method. It's ok throwing in classical allusions if you want to show off, but you don't mix them in wholesale with your thesis -- best saved for the pop-science book in any case.
In theory - there's no way that you COULD photograph a black hole... So...
What was "photographed" was the accretion disk around the black hole - not the black hole itself.
We Could Soon Watch a Black Hole in Action, Gobbling Up Matter in Real Time
https://www.livescience.com/65246-first-black-hole-movie.html
Being able to watch a black hole consume matter in real time will not only be exciting but watching the real time event will give astronomers a lot of new insight on the Universe in general.
https://www.livescience.com/65246-first-black-hole-movie.html
Being able to watch a black hole consume matter in real time will not only be exciting but watching the real time event will give astronomers a lot of new insight on the Universe in general.
"Real time" for something that is millions of light-years way is something all together different.
Okay - "real time" + a few million years...?
Who says you can't time travel!
Who says you can't time travel!
Why did the photon cross the slit?
A: To get to every side.
A: To get to every side.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/17/world/earliest-molecule-in-the-universe-scn/index.html
When the universe formed during the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, the chemical reactions of the aftermath formed the first molecules. Those first molecules were crucial in helping form everything we know, but they're also absent.
And although HeH+, the helium hydride ion, has been proposed for years as that first molecule, scientists couldn't find any evidence of its existence in space -- until now. The findings were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Astrochemical models in the late 1970s pointed to a detectable possibility. This led scientists to believe that HeH+ might exist in the chaotic planetary nebula ejected by stars like our sun during the last stage before they explode in a supernova.
The molecular ion is formed when the radiation of the star, reaching temperatures more than 100,000 degrees, ionizes the nebula.
So, in order for the Big Bang to have taken place there would had to have been local ionization at each of the galactic centers of each galaxy in order for the radiation to reach more than 100k degrees.
After the Big Bang, HeH+ formed in a molecular bond when helium atoms and protons combined. Later, these would break apart into hydrogen molecules and helium atoms. Both elements are the two most abundant throughout the universe, with hydrogen first and helium second.
It can be safely assumed then that the field of space that lead to the ionization of the Big Bang would have been comprised mostly of hydrogen and helium atomic components.
When the universe formed during the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, the chemical reactions of the aftermath formed the first molecules. Those first molecules were crucial in helping form everything we know, but they're also absent.
And although HeH+, the helium hydride ion, has been proposed for years as that first molecule, scientists couldn't find any evidence of its existence in space -- until now. The findings were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Astrochemical models in the late 1970s pointed to a detectable possibility. This led scientists to believe that HeH+ might exist in the chaotic planetary nebula ejected by stars like our sun during the last stage before they explode in a supernova.
The molecular ion is formed when the radiation of the star, reaching temperatures more than 100,000 degrees, ionizes the nebula.
So, in order for the Big Bang to have taken place there would had to have been local ionization at each of the galactic centers of each galaxy in order for the radiation to reach more than 100k degrees.
After the Big Bang, HeH+ formed in a molecular bond when helium atoms and protons combined. Later, these would break apart into hydrogen molecules and helium atoms. Both elements are the two most abundant throughout the universe, with hydrogen first and helium second.
It can be safely assumed then that the field of space that lead to the ionization of the Big Bang would have been comprised mostly of hydrogen and helium atomic components.
stars like our sun don't explode in a supernova
Indeed. That's but one thing wrong with the post. There is real science lurking in there but it has been pounded into an avant-garde sculpture by the lump hammer of misunderstanding.
assume = ass + u + meThe thing that I wonder about is who actually assume these theories/ideas, "we assume" "they assume" "one can assume" etc, who are these people?
for even bothering to consider these notions? Any cogent response seemingly gets redirected to /dev/null.
Similar threads
