Didn't this all get hashed out in the "Cool with Q" thread? I'm getting deja q.
"Cause and Effect" for me. All I'm seeing are a bunch of 3s.
Didn't this all get hashed out in the "Cool with Q" thread? I'm getting deja q.
Yes, you're correct. That's why I was getting a bit frustrated.Didn't this all get hashed out in the "Cool with Q" thread? I'm getting deja q.
Genesis is a dead science as far as we know in the Trek Universe, never to be used again.I certainly wouldn't consider the second use of the device a success! Whether the cave was stable in long term we do not know. If protomatter was used, then probably not. Though if it worked in small scale, then perhaps it is used to help terraforming in TNG era. We know that they can terraform planets, but the exact methods have never been discussed.
Pre-sequel...ish.
I don't get it. People are unhappy with the DSC Klingons, so they give them hair to make them look more like TNG klingons. People are unhappy with the prequel status of DSC, wanting a return to the post-Nemesis era of Trek, so DSC moves to the 28th century and people are unhappy?
Frankly I don't mind at all seeing more stories told contemporary to TOS. This era of trek history is woefully unexplored, and I'd rather see more of that than anything from the TNG era.
Though not a great way to make friends.![]()
Don't quote me, but I think it has something to do with brains...Friends? friends, what is friends?
BURNHAM:I think it depends on how it is handled. If the galaxy outside of Control exists in some kind of technological dark age, it could be interesting.
BURNHAM:
The long night has come. The Federation, the greatest civilization in history, has fallen. Now one ship, one crew, have vowed to drive back the night and rekindle the light of civilization. On the starship Discovery... hope lives again.
I certainly wouldn't consider the second use of the device a success! Whether the cave was stable in long term we do not know. If protomatter was used, then probably not. Though if it worked in small scale, then perhaps it is used to help terraforming in TNG era. We know that they can terraform planets, but the exact methods have never been discussed.
Genesis itself may have been deemed a failure, but the science behind it did not die, and the Marcuses' work was indeed meant to have eventually formed the basis for famed Federation terraformer Gideon Seyetik's successful use of a protomatter device to re-ignite Epsilon 119's dead star in "Second Sight" (DS9). As Robert Hewitt Wolfe explained in the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion, page 103: "[Protomatter] was established Federation terraforming technology...Of course, the Genesis device didn't work, but obviously Seyetik's work is built upon the research of previous scientists. And it was a nice way to work in a reference to the movies."Genesis is a dead science as far as we know in the Trek Universe, never to be used again.
Just about everybody associated with the project died (Carol & Chekov being the exceptions) and the core research was lost when Khan stole all the existing materials (then blew it all up along with the Reliant) and David's knowledge was lost when he was killed by the Klingons.
With that, I'm pretty confident that nothing more was done with it as Carol would be the only one with the exact knowledge to begin again.
I rather doubt that would happen as she lost everybody she loved because of it.
Also, Saavik was the only other one aware of the Protomatter connection, and again due to the dire circumstances, I sincerely doubt she ever told anybody.
Just because we as the audience know all the facts and connective details, does not mean that in-universe the information is available or easily reconstructed..
Exactly! And for that matter, how do we know the Caretakers/Nacene, described by Our Heroes™ as "sporocystian lifeforms"—of whom one was responsible for transporting Voyager across the galaxy in the first place—weren't in some manner connected to the network? For all we know, those tetryon arrays might be their equivalent of a spore drive!How do we know it wasn’t discussed during any of the 61,320 hours of the Voyager’s journey that didn’t make it onscreen?
Been there, done that. Sounds like the premise of Andromeda...
28th Century Discovery? Who are they interacting with? They can't set off on brand new adventures with primitive 22nd tech ...
28th Century Discovery? Who are they interacting with? They can't set off on brand new adventures with primitive 22nd tech ...
So that's where Star Trek is going? Awesome! </sarcasm>BURNHAM:
The long night has come. The Federation, the greatest civilization in history, has fallen. Now one ship, one crew, have vowed to drive back the night and rekindle the light of civilization. On the starship Discovery... hope lives again.
So that's where Star Trek is going? Awesome!
Well, Discovery's design is based on conceptual artwork for Planet Of The Titans, after all...It’s just as possible they don’t do a time jump at all, or they jump to another galaxy, or even jump very far into the past.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.