The irony is thick.This is getting absurd.
The irony is thick.This is getting absurd.
So fucking what?I’m not inventing anything. They never used the damn device the way it was meant to be used.
Calm down.So fucking what?
SAAVIK: It's time for total truth between us. This planet is not what you intended, or hoped for, is it?
DAVID: Not exactly.
SAAVIK: Why?
DAVID: I used protomatter in the Genesis matrix.
SAAVIK: Protomatter. An unstable substance which every ethical scientist in the galaxy has denounced as dangerously unpredictable.
DAVID: But it was the only way to solve certain problems.
SAAVIK: So, like your father, you changed the rules.
DAVID: If I hadn't, it might have been years, ...or never!
Apparently it was never. The instability was specifically stated to be due protomatter, not due the method the device was used, nor was there known way to make the thing without the protomatter. This inane obsession of comparing a tech that was shown to work to a tech that was not shown to work is really tiresome.
Is that what happened with American Gods? Because the second season is great, but took forever for them to make.For the same reason why he got fired from his other shows, he is a very creative guy, who is unable to turn in a script on time and on budget.
Which means something else will have to invalidate them.We do. It didn't. Comparing it to the spore drive or time crystals is absurd. Both have been shown to work reliably multiple times.
Because they killed the one guy they had that knew how to create it. (David)Why didn't the Klingons ever re-create the genesis device?
Is that what happened with American Gods? Because the second season is great, but took forever for them to make.
So basically they need the same to happen to the spore driveBecause they killed the one guy they had that knew how to create it.
And they never got the plans for it cause Khan beat them to them and then destroyed them.
![]()
Thank you. I didn't know if he'd left or if he got fired.Fuller was fired from that show before season two was made.
No, because that would be a mere hindrance, not eliminate it completely. And as I have already said repeatedly, this was not the reason the Genesis device was not replicated, it was never successfully built in the first place.So basically they need the same to happen to the spore drive
Except it's not really the same, Star Fleet most likely has a complete idea of how to create the Spore Drive Mechanics, they just don't have a morally legal way yet, to duplicate Stamets.So basically they need the same to happen to the spore drive
????No, because that would be a mere hindrance, not eliminate it completely. And as I have already said repeatedly, this was not the reason the Genesis device was not replicated, it was never successfully built in the first place.
Plus it would be illegal.And Starfleet isn't in the business of asking it's officers to undergo genetic manipulation, normally.
Successfully built = actually works.????
The Genesis Device WAS built at least TWICE that we know of.
One to successfully create the inside of that abandoned moon and a second that Khan stole.
Now whether or not the second one was successful, is a completely different matter for debate.
![]()
Correct....Successfully built = actually works.
I certainly wouldn't consider the second use of the device a success! Whether the cave was stable in long term we do not know. If protomatter was used, then probably not. Though if it worked in small scale, then perhaps it is used to help terraforming in TNG era. We know that they can terraform planets, but the exact methods have never been discussed.Correct....
And the First device successfully created the apparently stable Genesis Cavern out of the inner guts of the Regula Moon.
While the Second, successfully created an unstable Partial Solar System out of the Mutara Nebula.
Only one device was used correctly, but both substantially created the desired final outcome.
We don't know if the Genesis Cavern would have eventually gone the same way as the Planet, but it apparently was stable according to the conversation that we were given between Carol and Kirk.
Didn't this all get hashed out in the "Cool with Q" thread? I'm getting deja q.I certainly wouldn't consider the second use of the device a success! Whether the cave was stable in long term we do not know. If protomatter was used, then probably not. Though if it worked in small scale, then perhaps it is used to help terraforming in TNG era. We know that they can terraform planets, but the exact methods have never been discussed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.