Maybe the same term is used to describe two different things. Perhaps the time crystals on DSC are not the same thing as the current definition of a time crystal -- which is a crystal that moves then returns to its original alignment at its lowest energy state.I know what time crystals are. They have nothing to do with time travel. They're discussing the structure of the crystal, which is periodic -- repeating -- in space (as normal crystals are) as well as in time (i.e. the structure recurs at some regular interval).
I can't tell the difference between coffee made with Folgers crystals and coffee from the finest restaurants!What about new Folger's Crystals?
Now every time I see Spock look into his scope on TOS I'll fear something is gonna stab his eyes out.
Thanks Discovery!![]()
MMORPGs very much have cause and effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrupted_Blood_incident . As technology develops and emergent gameplay increases, it will only become moreso.
Also, I don't see anything that indicates that the Mirror Universe doesn't operate on cause and effect, and Mirror characters who enter the Prime universe likewise probably feel the Prime Universe is for their amusement as well (see how Mirror Georgiou acts).
I know what time crystals are. They have nothing to do with time travel. They're discussing the structure of the crystal, which is periodic -- repeating -- in space (as normal crystals are) as well as in time (i.e. the structure recurs at some regular interval).
For all we know such a universe exists in the real reality as well somewhere out there. While extremely, highly improbable, nothing definitively prevents it.The Mirror Universe is very much a 'merry land of messed up Oz.'
What everyone says when they go there:
"I went to the MU, and you were there and you were there and you were there, but you were all kinda crazy and sort of evil. Except Spock was the same except for that beard we all seemed to prefer him sporting."
I made no factual errors, I ignored no research, and I paid attention to the details of the episode. (Indeed, a lot of my discontent is precisely because I paid attention to the details of the episode, and applied some critical thinking to them.) My responses to your specific points make that abundantly clear.When you are making factual errors or errors that would be fixed by some basic research or paying attention then how is that offensive?
Responding to said advice by telling someone to take a long walk of a short pier when they points out such ignorance or denial of factual evidence is offensive, IMO.
Why not just do what the videogame franchise "Star Ocean" did and say that the entire universe is an MMORPG created by superior beings?
To say that fans of the game series were not happy is an understatement, to put it mildly.
I made no factual errors, I ignored no research, and I paid attention to the details of the episode. (Indeed, a lot of my discontent is precisely because I paid attention to the details of the episode, and applied some critical thinking to them.) My responses to your specific points make that abundantly clear.
But you went rude and condescending in your first comments to me, before I'd even had a chance to respond. You really seem to assume that someone who doesn't share your opinions must suffer from some cognitive deficiency, and you can't resist saying so. You practically come across like a Republican. I assure you, under the circumstances, "take a long walk off a short pier" was the most polite response I could offer.
Plenty of other posters are capable of a point-counterpoint exchange of views without copping an attitude about it. You should give it a try sometime. We're all here to share our mutual enjoyment of a hobby, right? Not to score points for ego gratification?
IF (big if) there are in fact an infinite number of universes, there would be one like the mirror universe..For all we know such a universe exists in the real reality as well somewhere out there. While extremely, highly improbable, nothing definitively prevents it.
There is no need to bring politics into this.You practically come across like a Republican.
Constant rolling retcons are a bad way to manage a shared universe, though. (I'm a longtime comics fan; it's been a source of annoyance for years.) Even if they work for the purposes of a single story, on a long-term basis they just destabilize the setting, and thereby diminish audience investment.Time travel, like cloaking tech, is constantly being retconned in Star Trek. We have to assume that in Balance of Power, the Enterprise is marveling at yet another new cloaking tech, not cloaking tech in general.
I probably could too, with a little effort. But I shouldn't have to make that effort, because it's the writers' job to do so. (They get paid handsomely for it, unlike me, and what they come up with is canon instead of mere speculation.) A story that doesn't make sense unless the audience takes extra effort to plug its logical gaps is a badly told story.I was thinking the same thing as I watched the episode, but I just told myself that I'm sure I could come up with some timey-wimey-wibbly-wobbly explanation...
"Perhaps"?Perhaps the time crystals on DSC are not the same thing as the current definition of a time crystal
Have they established exactly how this AI is going to destroy life, the universe and everything? I haven’t been clear on that.
I've always contended that he show already aligns with canon. There is nothing the DSC has presented story-wise or character-wise thus far that is in direct contradiction to TOS.
So I don't see a need for a reset to align it with canon.
Missiles. Lots of really big, ****-off planet-killing missiles.
They were pretty clear on that.
I just want to know where the red angel was for all of season 1 when Michaels ass was on the line level times and started a HUGE war.![]()
I've asked you before to adjust the way you speak to people who dislike the show or comment negatively. There is no need for this rude, cleverer-than-thou snark along with your posts; if you have counterpoints to make, just make them without the comments. Given that I have already cautioned you about this behaviour, I will now need to formalise it.Please do pay attention.
And please don't respond this way either - I know you were responding to a rude comment in turn, but please just hit notify.Please do go take a long walk off a short pier.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.