All except Tasha...
If nobody is killable in DSC, might as well toss in the towel now. That's why TNG and Voyager got old for me, because you knew without a shadow of a doubt that they'd all make it through, it was just a question of how. The final outcome was always all too predictable.
The Andorians, Tellarites and Vulcans wanted to honor Captain Archer for saving the galaxy and starting their version of the United Nations, so it put Starfleet in charge of defence with the caveat only white males from North America can be top dog.Wow, just wow.
Clearly Star Trek has been lacking in straight white males![]()
The Andorians, Tellarites and Vulcans wanted to honor Captain Archer for saving the galaxy and starting their version of the United Nations, so it put Starfleet in charge of defence with the caveat only white males from North America can be top dog.Everyone else just had to suck it up, however in the Kelvinverse after the Marcus scandal they rest of the Federation saw the light.....
All except Tasha...
And then she asked to come back...right?Right, meaning if an actor has an issue and wants to move on, only then did that actor get killed off.
A quote from Denise Crosby: "I was miserable. I couldn’t wait to get off that show. I was dying. This was not an overnight decision. I was grateful to have made that many episodes, but I didn’t want to spend the next six years going “Aye, aye, captain,” and standing there, in the same uniform, in the same position on the bridge. It just scared the hell out of me that this was what I was going to be doing for the next X-amount of years."
After WW3, the entire planet was wiped out, except Montana.....which explains TOS and ENTWithout a doubt, how can an organisation which represents dozens of species, all their various ethnicities and assorted complex genders possibly not be dominated by a group which represent.....what percentage of humanity exactly?
After WW3, the entire planet was wiped out, except Montana.....which explains TOS and ENT
And then she asked to come back...right?
Good drama is the HOW. VOY got stale because their HOWs were mostly bland and they often failed to tie the stakes of the situation with consistent characterization, even when one or the other was handled well. If the litmus test for drama is reduced to WILL THEY LIVE THIS WEEK, then there is no drama of interpersonal interaction, no sense of interesting adventure, no exploration of unknown "out there" or the "in here" of the human condition. Accepting that leads likely won't die each week is part of buying into the concept, like artificial gravity or warp speed or the Captain going on away missions ever.That's why TNG and Voyager got old for me, because you knew without a shadow of a doubt that they'd all make it through, it was just a question of how.
Right, meaning if an actor has an issue and wants to move on, only then did that actor get killed off.
A quote from Denise Crosby: "I was miserable. I couldn’t wait to get off that show. I was dying. This was not an overnight decision. I was grateful to have made that many episodes, but I didn’t want to spend the next six years going “Aye, aye, captain,” and standing there, in the same uniform, in the same position on the bridge. It just scared the hell out of me that this was what I was going to be doing for the next X-amount of years."
Good drama is the HOW. VOY got stale because their HOWs were mostly bland and they often failed to tie the stakes of the situation with consistent characterization, even when one or the other was handled well. If the litmus test for drama is reduced to WILL THEY LIVE THIS WEEK, then there is no drama of interpersonal interaction, no sense of interesting adventure, no exploration of unknown "out there" or the "in here" of the human condition. Accepting that leads likely won't die each week is part of buying into the concept, like artificial gravity or warp speed or the Captain going on away missions ever.
He was believable as a TOS era crewman. See TOS - "The Corbomite Maneuver", "Balance Of Terror", "Obsession" (I could name more eps.) for examples of 'non-perfect' but very capable Human beings serving aboard the 1701.Okay, not the flagship, but regardless he's not believable as a chief science officer on the Enterprise or any Starfleet ship. That's a relatively minor point in my post.
They all went to a beautiful farm up-quadrant.So, there was no guarantee people would live?
We have no idea where Dr Pulaski went, or Argyle, or Kosinski....
That’s what mansplaining is. It’s a man arrogantly telling a woman something she either already knows or is more informed about that him, almost always after she’s made it clear she knows what she’s talking about. It’s quite common in real life.One way to look at his death is that while the subtext can be seen as mansplaining you can also just see it as a arrogant snob who is always butting heads with everyone. One of the good things about Sci-Fi when written well is the audience can bring their own view to something. I bet if we see this guy again in fan fiction or a novel for example he will be just as arrogant to Spock. This should be how everyone can enjoy this scene and the funny death whether they are liberal,moderate or conservative.
Jason
Is it still Mansplaining if he does the same thing to another man?That’s what mansplaining is. It’s a man arrogantly telling a woman something she either already knows or is more informed about that him, almost always after she’s made it clear she knows what she’s talking about. It’s quite common in real life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.