Hey not a bad idea.
It could be worse.
Someone could resurrect the thread about the name of the 12/13 original Constitution class ships in TOS![]()
I’m joking relax
Hey not a bad idea.
It could be worse.
Someone could resurrect the thread about the name of the 12/13 original Constitution class ships in TOS![]()
I mean, I'm not UNhappy...I have lost the will to live.
I hope you're all happy.
![]()
...So, Richard Arnold attributing his opinions to Gene Roddenberry, then?So I suspect that the idea for making the first season of TNG happen in 2364 goes back ultimately to Gene Roddenberry and/or Richard Arnold.
Yeah, same here, as I stated above.Indeed, I've always assumed that the exact date in "The Neutral Zone" only got through because of the writers' strike. I suspect that if there had been time to revise the script, the date reference would probably have been cut out.
The correct answer (not listed in your poll) is: YES!
I don’t see the point there are two answer choices 23rd or 22nd can’t get any more simple than that.
Kelley himself would have been 46 in 1966. So, only 5 years off the mark. And if Bones was 41, Kirk would have been 34, which I believe is correct.
Yeah I think it’s 2285 in TWOK so maybe Kirk doesn’t realize that alcohol needs time to ferment. I mean we don’t see him drink so much.There still is debate of this sort, but it doesn't sound plausible that the writers themselves would ever have been thinking in terms of stardates or anything like that. They had done the "300 years in the future" thing in the previous movie already, and were borrowing material from a wholly different fandom work that supported this thing, not from SFC.
If 2283 is a Gregorian year, then it can't be the current year of Kirk wouldn't be alarmed by it. But is it in the future or the past? Ales might indeed need to ferment before being at their best - is Kirk alarmed that he needs to wait until 2283 before opening the bottle?
Timo Saloniemi
What!The internal evidence of TOS contradicts itself. The best that can be said is sometime between the 22nd and 28th centuries.
It's a pretty direct assertion. They contradicted themselves.What!
The 28th century endpoint comes from "The Squire of Gothos," which places itself in at least the 27th century but possibly also in the 28th.What!
Yeah, the whole "Romulan Ale from 2283 thing" is a whole other kettle of fish. A while back I saw a debate about it on here that brought in the fact that it was an ale and discussed what the possible fermentation process might be.There were decades of fan debate over whether "2283" was a Gregorian date, a stardate, a Romulan date, or something else -- and whether McCoy's "it takes a while" line was literal or sarcastic. After all, the then-popular SFC dating scheme would've put TWOK in the early 2220s.
Yep. It's the outlier.The 28th century endpoint comes from "The Squire of Gothos," which places itself in at least the 27th century but possibly also in the 28th.
I mean how hard is it to figure out a time and stick to it.Yep. It's the outlier.
When TOS was being made, no one knew when it took place.
I mean how hard is it to figure out a time and stick to it.
Aw, thanks. I'd like to thank the Academy...JQ wins the thread.
Assuming that McCoy is being sarcastic is generally a safe bet. It's one of the things I love the most about the character.As a ten year-old kid I thought McCoy was being sarcastic (imagine!). I haven't budged.
Yeah. I forget where I first read this, but it's also really cool that Spock got Kirk a book to read, and McCoy got Kirk the glasses that would help him read it. Those two make a formidable tag team.One of the themes of the scene seems to be that McCoy is sending a not-so-subtle message with his gifts.
Not very, if that's what you want to do. But Gene Roddenberry & company consciously wanted to keep the time period of TOS vague, so it's kind of silly to criticize them for doing exactly what they wanted to do. The unclear timeframe of TOS is not a bug, it's a feature.I mean how hard is it to figure out a time and stick to it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.