You say that Nimoy wasn't a saint but all the supporting cast (in their biographies) and Shatner himself say he was generally a nice guy and most say Shatner was not. Is everyone mistaken? Is Shatner the nice guy and Nimoy the evil one? Sure Nimoy did some maneuvering and cashing in on Spock's fame but I never heard he did it to anyone else's detriment.
This is what I'm talking about; Nimoy was just as aggressive in working for his interests on TOS as Shatner, especially after he was aware of the fan response. Regarding his actions harming anyone else, it matters not if it was intentional as it had the same results; in competing with Shatner, seeking more screen time, line counting, etc., it would have the same allegedly negative effect on the "B Team" players as anything Shatner was doing, yet the bitter "B Team" all lay it on Shatner, which is unfair. Further, Shatner was the star of the show (and who could argue against his being one of the reasons for the success of the second pilot that--ultimately--put food on all of their tables?), and aside from Nimoy in season one, then adding Kelley for the remainder of the series, no one ever promised the others that they were going to be elevated to a status anywhere near the stars of the series.
Again, Takei took the early 70s convention responses to mean he was on the level of Shatner, or deserved as much screen time / development, when the nature of the business placed recurring players in a box of character restriction, doing pretty much the same thing every week. Just look at characters such as Larabee from Get Smart, Don West or Judy Robinson from Lost in Space, Chief O'Hara from Batman, Mike Axford from The Green Hornet, Gladys Kravitz from Bewitched, and on and on. That set of characters were where Takei's comparisons should have pointed, as they served the same purpose of their respective series as he did on Star Trek. In other words, Shatner did not direct or seal his fate as Sulu like The Grand Puppet Master.
Last edited: