^that's why I wrote 'and yes, except for the introduction' 

Which is why "Dear Doctor" always stood out o me as quite odd in light of the tenants of evolution.
The core of it was a smart idea misunderstood by Braga. That is that evolution is not - despite how the word is used - about becoming more advanced. There are plenty of examples of creatures which have evolved to become more simple, like parasites.
That said, the part he didn't get was that evolution is about adaptation to the environment over, many, many generations. There's no way any sort of particles or radiation or whatever could cause you to mutate into exactly what your great great X10,000,000 grandchild would be like.
Agree with both of you, for exactly those reasons.Exactly. Evolution is a process of adaptation through natural selection. It's not necessarily a continuous climb toward some predestined goal. We are not necessarily destined to become big-brained energy beings or whatever. It's about change, not advancement.
Nope. They were presented as a potential threat. First we see their ship which is implied could stand against the Enterprise. Then we meet Tarr, who is hostile but also intelligent. The actions of the ones on the surface were admittedly bad. The Battle featured Bok who was eventually removed from command by a serious and intelligent Kazago. So they had laws. In Rascals, Lurin threatened to execute the crew, but he was a rogue. In Suspicions, Reyga was a smart and likable character. I could go on.The Ferengi were presented as a joke from the very start when they were jumping around like a bunch of crazy monkeys.
Nope. They were presented as a potential threat. First we see their ship which is implied could stand against the Enterprise. Then we meet Tarr, who is hostile but also intelligent. The actions of the ones on the surface were admittedly bad. The Battle featured Bok who was eventually removed from command by a serious and intelligent Kazago. So they had laws. In Rascals, Lurin threatened to execute the crew, but he was a rogue. In Suspicions, Reyga was a smart and likable character. I could go on.
I think people are viewing TNG Ferengi through the DS9 filter, which turned them into space clowns.
The idea is that episodes that are, by general consensus, considered bad, but you happen to like.I don't like any of the Trek episodes that I consider to be bad.
The idea is that episodes that are, by general consensus, considered bad, but you happen to like.
They can stay, but the ones in gorilla suits will have to go.I think people are viewing TNG Ferengi through the DS9 filter, which turned them into space clowns.
There are episodes that I think are bad, and that I like nonetheless. VOY's "threshold" for example. It's bad. And it breaks continuity like "Into Darkness" or the spore drive, and real science (evolution) even more. But it's fun all the way through, and way more memorable (in a good way!) than many of the "better", more mediocre episodes. Paris/Janeway baby-lizards all the way!
What's the one where the crew starts hallucinating, like Crusher sees dead bodies sitting up? I'll have to look it up but that's a good Halloween one too."Sub Rosa". Star Trek gets spooky. It makes for a good Halloween episode. It was weird seeing Data and Geordi at the gravesite with the reanimated corpse. But that added to the charm or bizarreness of the episode. The romance part might have been a bit cheesy, but overall, it was a good attempt at mixing scifi and a ghost story.
What's the one where the crew starts hallucinating, like Crusher sees dead bodies sitting up? I'll have to look it up but that's a good Halloween one too.
"Night Terrors".What's the one where the crew starts hallucinating, like Crusher sees dead bodies sitting up? I'll have to look it up but that's a good Halloween one too.
You are an officer and a gentlebeing. Thank you!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.