His sharp and angular style fits the Klingons really well. They should have let him design the Klingon ships for Discovery.FWIW, that D4 is a John Eaves design that I actually kinda like. (Maybe because it's not a Starfleet ship?...)
This was the ship that was designed and built for the episode, but was never actually used because reasons.
https://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/D4_class_(concept)
No, the quoted time ("Neptune and back in six minutes," warp 4.4 is 30 million kilometers per second.) matched the TOS warp scale, not the TNG one. Warp 4.4^3, the TOS formula, is about 85c, or 25,482,359 kps (close enough, rounding to the nearest ten million). Neptune is about 4.4 billion kilometers from Earth, so that's 2.8 minutes one-way, or 5 3/4 minutes round-trip. Again, close enough for a show trying to be a little less Star-Trek-formal with facts and figures.
On the TNG scale, warp 4.5 is 150 times the speed of light, or 45 million kps. No easy way to get that down to thirty in conversation. Likewise, it cuts the round-trip time to 3 1/4 minutes.
Shouldn't this vary wildly depending on where the 2 planets are in their orbits? Or is Earth's orbit so small compared to Neptune that it doesn't matter for our purposes?
"Canon" should not be taken too seriously, in my opinion
Shouldn't this vary wildly depending on where the 2 planets are in their orbits? Or is Earth's orbit so small compared to Neptune that it doesn't matter for our purposes?
The distance is always within about 30AU ± 1AU, about 4.5 billion km, with a margin of error of ±3.3%. For a travel time of 2.8 minutes, that's less than 6 seconds off. So, yeah, the Earth's orbit is too small to matter much by comparison.Shouldn't this vary wildly depending on where the 2 planets are in their orbits? Or is Earth's orbit so small compared to Neptune that it doesn't matter for our purposes?
Because trying to solve a mystery is stimulating and fun, whereas resigning oneself to it is frustrating? Explaining something in a fictional universe by saying "because the writers did it" is the logical equivalent of explaining something in the real universe by saying "because God did it." It doesn't actually explain anything, and just fosters irritation and confusion.
The internet, social media, and everything else about this enhanced communication age underscores the fact that what goes on behind the scenes is, in many ways, just as fascinating in its own right as the finished products themselves.
It also gives more exposure to the vocal, dissatisfied few over the rather silent majority, giving the producers the impression that they represent that majority. It's always been the case, but the internet has enhanced this effect.
A visual reboot can't be the same as the Prime timeline.
The only thing I've said is to use your own brain
Sorry to bring this up again since it seems the discussion has moved on but, one important fact missing from the 'transwarp didn't work' argument is that it did work.
Captain Stile's said, paraphrased, If they try to get away with warp drive they're really in for a shock. We see the transwarp systems come online and the computer even audible confirms it is ready to go.*
The only reason it didn't work in ST3 is because Scotty sabotaged that circuit by simply removing some chips. (*which if we really want to pick at something - what about the Excelsior computer not discovering the missing chips during start up???)
So what about after that, was TWD completely scrapped simply because someone removing some chips renders it useless? I doubt it. Future ships clearly somehow managed to achieve greater warp factors and TWD is probably the reason why.
^ Conversely, the novelization of ST V suggests that the only reason the Enterprise-A made it to the galactic center was due to Sybok helping enhance the warp drive.
I was heavy into TREK Con's from the first one in NYC to the late 90's, and I remember distinctly Fans having numerous conversations all the time, about the TMP Klingon change.It baffles me whenever I see someone post something like this, and makes me wonder how long they've been part of Trek fandom. I clearly remember people wondering how to explain the change from 1979 forward, all the way through until 2005. And as I've posted before, people made attempts to do so, in all kinds of fanzine articles and even in licensed material, from novels to comics to RPGs. All those publications are still out there as evidence: it was the "elephant in the room" for Trek continuity for 26 years.
I thought he enhanced the shields? That is in the movie.
The Enterprise-A makes if from Earth to Nimbus III to the center of the galaxy inside a day. I'd say transwarp drive was a success*.
I thought he enhanced the shields? That is in the movie.
I can't like this enoughYes it can.
That's why I consider it more fun to accept that DSC is in the prime timeline. To see what kind of explanations I can come up with. To wit:
- The Klingons...that's easy. Either it's just normal racial diversity among their species, or the "Augment cure" went wrong. Or both.
- Uniforms? Hell, that's a no-brainer. Uniforms change all the damn time. Often within the same series!
- The D7: Also easy. Obviously that's not the Klingon term for the class, so it has to be something the Federation made up. And who's to say what it actually means? Could have nothing to do with appearance.
- Technology, like on the bridge: All it takes is somebody from another ship to visit and say something like "Hey, nice Mark III bridge! Rest of the fleet's still stuck on the old Mark I."
- The Enterprise: One word...REFIT. That's how they explained it in TMP, and that's how it can be explained now.
See? I AM using my brain. Just not the way you wanted.
It is? Could you remind me of the line?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.