i always retconned it as Gary Mitchell was taunting Kirk with some painful in-joke from their Academy days.
I always rather just ignored it. It's not a particularily prominent piece of canon.
i always retconned it as Gary Mitchell was taunting Kirk with some painful in-joke from their Academy days.
Well no because that would change later stories completely. They’d also need to change the Romulans to match.By that standard, they can make Vulcans red, with no ears, six foot tales and eat their vegetables through a port in their stomachs. Once you've changed the look, you've changed the universe.
Well no because that would change later stories completely.
Yeah but what about the 6 foot tail? Good luck walking around the Enterprise with that.Red Vulcans wouldn't change their story.
Wasn't Spock supposed to be a red-skinned martian at first?
Wasn't Spock supposed to be a red-skinned martian at first?
Much like Xenomorph-Klingons, we'll just ignore it. Because it being "Prime" seems to be more important than the universe making sense.
Much like Xenomorph-Klingons, we'll just ignore it. Because it being "Prime" seems to be more important than the universe making sense.
Also Klingon makeup changing isn’t new. The Klingons in TMP onwards looked and acted absolutely nothing like the TOS Klingons, yet people accepted them all the same.
It's a question of what the authors say it is.
...yet people accepted them all the same.
Sorry I should have said ‘eventually accepted it or moved on’I imagine you weren't around during that time. It will be interesting to see fan reaction if they force that look on Worf or other popular Klingons.
Uuuuuh, I'm looking forward to that. "We don't talk about it with Federation players"Star Trek online is going to have TNG style Klingons interacting with DSC style Klingons, under CBS approval. So who knows.
The author who helped make Spock the character he is, says he is an only child. The author who helped create Enterprise has said it is an alternate timeline. What the Discovery people say lasts only as long as they are in charge. And is only applicable to the people working on the show or tie-in material.
That should have nothing, zero, zilch to do with it.
It's just the way it works.
Well, no. People get meaning and interpretations different from what the author intended all the time.
I would like you to answer my request about what constitutes "too much" of a change for you, though.
So, how do you deal with contradictions between official interpretation and on-screen stuff or official interpretation and other official interpretation?Yes, but since your (or my) interpretation is personal, the only official one we have is from the author. It's a safer bet for me to rely on that than on yours, then.
It's a safer bet for me to rely on that than on yours, then.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.