We can close the thread right here, it won't get any betterIf you look at it from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - Star Trek canon is more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... timey wimey... stuff.
for the pew pew pew story they want to tell (a war with the bolians or whatever
You’re probably rightHonestly I think that'll take a while.
The romulan cloak line in BoT is annoying in light of ENT. That’s one of the continuity gaffes that really bugs me. That and the D7 the Xyrillian ship uses for fuel... nothing should have cloaked before that bird of prey in BoT - that really did annoy me about ENT.It probably also helps that I really only find the cloaking devices irreconcilable with that line from "Balance of Terror" and I don't find it that hard to imagine that one line didn't happen.
Four years of MU sidequests?This season was about war, and there was hardly any war in it, so I think your fears of pew-pewing it up are... unfounded.
I'm not a "hater," and I don't have any conception of what a "perfect" Star Trek series would be against which I'm comparing DSC. My complaints are simply that DSC has been a very mixed bag. Some good stories, but more bad ones, with lots of questionable plot logic, mishandled themes, and unearned payoffs. Some good acting, but more performances that are adequate at best. Some good visual designs, but more that leave me shaking my head in frustration.Actually, it's not a critical failure. Season 1 is 82 % on Rotten Tomatoes. However, it is a failure among some vocal members of the Star Trek fandom. But what Star Trek show wouldn't have haters? Every fan who's a critic of Discovery has their own idea of what their perfect Star Trek series would be and if that series were ever to be produced, an equal number of haters would appear for it as well. Every single Star Trek series after TOS has had a lot of haters in the fandom, and the trend will continue forever.
From a business standpoint, it's undeniably true that any "older fanbase" is going to be less important to producers than the coveted 18-34 market, frustrating as that may be. From an artistic standpoint, however, that kind of reasoning doesn't justify anything whatsoever.The loudest critics to Discovery were similar to those upset at Star Wars TFA: anger at increased roles for women and minorities. The same people that purposefully tried to tip the scales on Rotten Tomatoes. And yet Discovery is still doing well there.
Fandom was the primary one decrying the first Abrams film when audiences generally liked it. The lesson forward is to just try and make a good show and ignore the older fanbase. If you please them, that's gravy, if not, well.. no big loss.
And yet somehow my original TOS DVDs still play just fine. Or the Remastered Blu-rays if you don't mind a little revision.Nothing bizarre about it. They are overwriting TOS a piece at a time. Cloaking devices, eye sight in the Mirror Universe, the Klingons, the D7. And now? The Enterprise.
Wait....you have the "unspecial" version??????????I can still enjoy A New Hope without Greedo shooting first and missing Han from two feet away, or I can pop in the Special Edition and watch Han step on Jabba's tail and totally undermine his rep as a badass gangster.
It's an age of wondrous possibilities.
And yet somehow my original TOS DVDs still play just fine. Or the Remastered Blu-rays if you don't mind a little revision.
They can't overwrite anything. They can revise or recontextualize it for a new setting, but that doesn't erase what came before any more than the changes to the Klingons in TMP did. You're still free to enjoy TOS exactly as it was, just like I can still enjoy A New Hope without Greedo shooting first and missing Han from two feet away, or I can pop in the Special Edition and watch Han step on Jabba's tail and totally undermine his rep as a badass gangster.
It's an age of wondrous possibilities.
I'm not talking about the show existing, I watched several episodes just the other night. On Blu-ray!
I'm talking about its place in the supposed Prime universe. That is slowly but surely being overwritten.
DSC is a footnote.
I'm not talking about the show existing, I watched several episodes just the other night. On Blu-ray!
I'm talking about its place in the supposed Prime universe. That is slowly but surely being overwritten. Which is fine. But I don't expect TPTB to piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining. Just tell me you're pissing on my shoes and get it over with.![]()
They’re both the same ship, it just looks different in DSC, that is all.
The Mustang isn’t a fictional spaceship.Well heck, I can go out and buy a POS '86 Mustang and tell everyone that it is the same as a '64. That is the way the world works now? We just relabel and ride the coattails of what was popular before!
Hey now, lots of Fox body Mustangs were pretty cool.
View attachment 5268
STD? More of an AMC Javelin...
Sadly that’s why there have been 2 Jurassic World movies.That is the way the world works now? We just relabel and ride the coattails of what was popular before!
No, the Enterprise is. But if I was to buy a modern American standard stratocaster and tell everyone it was a genuine 54 strat that was “reimagined” or that had some “details” changed that would be the same kind of thing: saying that a newer copy was an icon. In this analogy the Enterprise is the 54 Strat. The modern strat looks similar, plays similar and sounds similar through an amp - but I couldn’t claim that Hank Marvin played it, nor was it ever featured on a shadows record. Star Trek is the shadows record in this analogy. The DSC Enterprise is the modern strat. Although the guitar and the fictional starship are not the same kind of entity, their relationship to each other is analogousThe Mustang isn’t a fictional spaceship
No, the Enterprise is. But if I was to buy a modern American standard stratocaster and tell everyone it was a genuine 54 strat that was “reimagined” or that had some “details” changed that would be the same kind of thing: saying that a newer copy was an icon. In this analogy the Enterprise is the 54 Strat. The modern strat looks similar, plays similar and sounds similar through an amp - but I couldn’t claim that Hank Marvin played it, nor was it ever featured on a shadows record. Star Trek is the shadows record in this analogy. The DSC Enterprise is the modern strat. Although the guitar and the fictional starship are not the same kind of entity, their relationship to each other is analogous![]()
I used to know this guy, every time someone commented on how pretty a sunset or sunrise was, he'd turn and say "But do you know why?" and then try to murder the moment with a discourse on particulates in air pollution. He got to be a parody of himself. People would knowingly try to bring up something pleasant to see those massive eyebrows raise a milimeter or two and the neck turn as if on queue to try and add his gloomy erudition.Most people who've liked Star Trek will never notice; STD is a footnote.
I owned one of those, too.I meant one that's been beat to the point of no return. Why I put "POS" before it. I have an overall fondness for the Fox Body. I should've used the '79 Mustang II.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.