Meh, Norapoint sounds like it could've been Nora Darhk who was responsible.
I absolutely loved this finale. But what if the the hologram thinker at the end had escaped into the world wide web? I think that could have created some interesting possibilities for a digital Thinker to be a recurring villain later in the series. I think I would have liked that. The actor playing DeVoe was great and a digital super smart villain is a great concept.
Meh, Norapoint sounds like it could've been Nora Darhk who was responsible.
Or maybe Barry didn't die, but he failed to stop the satellite crash and it killed many of his friends. Nora's spent months stalking and spying on Team Flash, perhaps for historical research (I'm reminded of the Kristin Wells Superwoman from Elliot S! Maggin's '70s comics), and when the moment of destruction came, she couldn't bear to watch them die.
I absolutely loved this finale. But what if the the hologram thinker at the end had escaped into the world wide web? I think that could have created some interesting possibilities for a digital Thinker to be a recurring villain later in the series. I think I would have liked that. The actor playing DeVoe was great and a digital super smart villain is a great concept.
I think Nora might have accidentally prevented her own birth. She's now a time abberation, and Barry's daughter will instead be Dawn. It would give her an excuse to stay on Team Flash long-term.
That said, the one line about Devoe getting all those powers so he could beat anyone the Flash could get for help was ridiculous. Kara should be able to take out all 12 of Devoes bus metas separately.
Kryptonians are ridiculously powerful, and Kara is less likely to hold back than Superman.
Another thing they didn't think of. Devoe's satellites may be able to affect the entire planet, but not the entire multiverse, so why wouldn't the good guys flee to another Earth?
Ab-Nora-MailityThat's Normageddon.![]()
We are talking about a single individual with all of the following powers at the same time:
1) Dimensional manipulation.
2) DNA manipulation.
3) Effigy manipulation.
4) Elasticity.
5) Energy absorption.
6) Gravity manipulation.
7) Jinxing.
8) Psychoactive fluids.
9) Size alteration.
10) Sound manipulation.
11) Technopathy.
12) Telepathy.
I am not sure what Kara could do that would work any differently than what Barry tried.
And what would the point of that be? It's this Earth that Team Flash has to protect. Going to another Earth would just be running away and accepting defeat.
Then again... It was never established how DeVoe's powers would respond to magic. Maybe Amaya, Zari, or Constantine could've done something against him.
Magic might have fared a bit better but only because you can kinda bend the rules with it since magic, by definition, is outside the realm of science or the natural.
The realm of known science. If magic exists, then it's part of the universe, and that means science can expand to encompass it. I hate it when people assume science is some fixed, inflexible body of knowledge; that's the exact opposite of how it works. Science is about constantly asking questions and finding new answers and expanding what we know. A century and a half ago, quantum physics was beyond the realm of known science and would've seemed like impossible magic. Today, it's the foundation of modern physics and has practical applications in technology, including several of the bits of technology allowing us to have this conversation. Anything that exists is part of nature and can eventually fall within the realm of science. That's literally what science is for.
I think Christopher's point would be that magic is by definition "natural" if it exists at all -- that if we think it "beyond" natural, that's only because our definition of natural hasn't yet expanded to understand and embrace it.Good point. Arthur C Clarke's famous quote, "Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic", certainly comes to mind. I was just using the term magic a little differently, I guess. In mind, I think of magic as being supernatural, ie beyond nature and science as being the tool to explore the natural. By that view, if magic is beyond the natural and science can only understand the natural, then magic is beyond science. You are looking at magic differently, as merely the stuff that is still natural but that our science cannot yet explain. So a caveman would call a rocket magic because he does not understand how it works. Likewise, we would consider telekinesis to be magic but maybe it is actually possible with more advanced science.
In mind, I think of magic as being supernatural, ie beyond nature and science as being the tool to explore the natural. By that view, if magic is beyond the natural and science can only understand the natural, then magic is beyond science.
I think Christopher's point would be that magic is by definition "natural" if it exists at all -- that if we think it "beyond" natural, that's only because our definition of natural hasn't yet expanded to understand and embrace it.
That's a scientist's POV, however. In common parlance, "magic" does indeed mean exactly what you suggest -- which is why, for example, Kryptonians are vulnerable to it, when they are vulnerable to very little in the "natural" world.
I've never bought that distinction, though. It's confusing the limits on current understanding with absolute reality. "Nature" just means the universe. If magic is part of the universe, then it's natural. Like I said, it's erroneous to think that the stuff we don't understand yet is fundamentally different from the stuff we do. Quantum physics once seemed to be "beyond nature." It still seems like magic to people who don't understand it. But it's an integral part of nature, and science expanded to understand how it worked and how it was interconnected with other phenomena. The same would go for magic. In a universe where it exists, it would be part of the overall tapestry of how the universe worked. Referring to other parts as "natural" and that part as "supernatural" would be an arbitrary and ultimately meaningless distinction. You shouldn't confuse labels for objective truth. Part of what science is for is questioning our preconceptions, not taking our assumptions for granted. It's not a fixed body of knowledge, it's a process for learning new things. Anything that can be learned about is within the purview of science. If wizards can learn magic, so can scientists. "Science" literally just means "knowledge."
If wizards can learn magic, so can scientists.
Not if they're muggles.![]()
But much of what's taught at Hogwarts is the science of magic. It's the systematic study and understanding of how magic works and how to use it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.