I didn't realise she was so old. She's the same age Harry's mother was when she died.
It's been almost two decades since I was 36.
Back in the '90s I belonged to an on-campus SF club at the local college. One of the students in the group started whining one day about her 25th birthday coming up. Another chimed in, saying she wasn't looking forward to turning 30.
My friend and I, who were taking courses there with adult student status, just looked at each other and burst out laughing. I was past 30 at that point and my friend was past 50.
We informed them that turning 25, and even 30 is not fatal (unless you're living in the Logan's Run universe).
Diana was really too young to have married Charles. She didn't have a lot of life experience, and even then he preferred Camilla. But that all-so-important business of having to marry someone "without a past" who could produce the "heir and a spare" - the same royal obsession that prompted Henry VIII to marry 6 times because he wanted that heir and a spare - pretty much forced him to take the first available woman who came along who fit all the requirements, and with whom he could get along (at least at first).
So in Meghan's case, she's had a lot more life experience than Diana did. She's used to being in the spotlight, used to paparazzi, and as an actress she's equipped to act interested at whatever royal functions she's required to attend, even if she's bored out of her mind.
With Diana, if she was bored, it was obvious. She hadn't had enough training to keep her inner state of mind from showing on her face or with her body language.
So 36 is old
er, but it's not
old. And she's young enough to have a kid, maybe two. Since Harry's a lot farther down the line of succession than he was a decade ago, it hardly matters now if he has kids or not.