"Has to?" Why?The first one has to wrap up the Kelvinverse and/or fold it back into the Prime timeline somehow.

"Has to?" Why?The first one has to wrap up the Kelvinverse and/or fold it back into the Prime timeline somehow.
Yep.
1) Star Trek 4 in Kelvin = JJ Abramsverse.
2) QT movie.
The first one has to wrap up the Kelvinverse and/or fold it back into the Prime timeline somehow. It will be the last one with that cast.
Agree on the tired super baddies, but star fleet trotting them out to investigate something any any crew and ship could do?The super baddie had run it's course since TNG films and it's still hanging still with the current films. A Voyager film should have a high concept narrative and not an evil guy with a super weapon tale. Admiral Janeway returns to see her old ship with a new Captain, a spacial oddity is present somewhere out in the Delta Quadrant and Star Fleet is order her along with her old crew mates to investigate.
Marvel are doing really well...Marvel are doing enough of that for everyone.
Yes, for those who like super heroes.Marvel are doing really well...
Marvel are doing really well...
Yes, for those who like super heroes.
Well, I'm not into super heroes that much.I’m really enjoying the Marvel stuff, but it would be a hiding to nowhere to try to follow that with similar huge budget high stakes movies, as WB are finding with the DC stuff.
Star Trek is back, it’s on TV, two movies going in to production. If they balls it up, spending too much money on not much substance, it’ll be gone for another decade.
I like this idea.While we will never get a stand alone Voyager movie I always hoped for a film, or trilogy, that brought together all of the 24th century casts. Some threat to the Federation that needed all of the Picard, Sisko, and Janeway badassery thrown at it that they could muster. I think it's still possible. Something in a Destiny vibe, I think, could translate well to the big screen. High stakes and not everyone is going to come through unscathed like in TNG when it was on tv. I think budget wise it's doable as, let's be frank, most of our casts won't be commanding top dollar wage wise and SFX and CGI have come along way.
I'm not sure, but I would think Star Fleet would ask a CO who had experience in that part of the Milky Way Galaxy to investigate. I don't require a sequel from some episode because I never thought VOY episodes were strong... well except for "Distant Origins", that story was tight and done. I want a fresh tale which doesn't gravy train those episodes especially when it dealt with 7 and the Doctor. Not interested in it at all, bring on something fresh and new like from "The Voyage Home".Agree on the tired super baddies, but star fleet trotting them out to investigate something any any crew and ship could do?
If a Voyager movie was to be made, it would be expected to have the ship itself, something of the Delta Quadrant, and the reunion of the cast. Was anything set up in the series that would lend itself to a continuation. Pursuing an otherwise lost cause or something? Another lost ship they could go and bring back, knowing what they know. That would be an excuse to include Barclay too.
I’m burned out on the ‘they alone can save the universe’ stories, and I suspect I’m not alone. Marvel are doing enough of that for everyone.
What's back on TV, and the last few movies are "Star Trek" in name onlyStar Trek is back, it’s on TV, two movies going in to production. If they balls it up, spending too much money on not much substance, it’ll be gone for another decade.
Discovery is on TV, and it’s every bit not proper trek that Voyager wasn’t.What's back on TV, and the last few movies are "Star Trek" in name only
I totally agree!What's back on TV, and the last few movies are "Star Trek" in name only
Discovery actually is not on TV.Discovery is on TV, and it’s every bit not proper trek that Voyager wasn’t.
I don’t like the new movies, but I did pay money to watch them.
Discovery actually is not on TV.
You do know people were saying that in 1987, right?What's back on TV, and the last few movies are "Star Trek" in name only
Yes its on a paid only service, not on network tvUnless I’ve confused it with the microwave again, Discovery most certainly is on TV. It’s on a subscription streaming service, but what isn’t these days. Everything comes down the phone line now, but It’s no different to having a satellite subscription to watch Enterprise back in the day.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.