But hacking into a celebrity's private account is perfectly fine.
Will be there be nudity in Season 2?
- Thread starter PicardSpeedo
- Start date
- Status
Haha. That's hilarious. Okay, I'll let you believe I'm 'jealous' of Tilly's 'looks' ... that's the real reason why I find the prospect of her naked onscreen unappealing.
Brilliant.
I don't care, but you pretty obsessed with her.
The "Like" in that sentence is a key point.
I highly doubt that @Awesome Possum thinks you are jealous of Tilly's looks.
More like, sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. You see nothing wrong with actors and actresses' privacy being invaded for entertainment. So, why is not right for you?
Well, they're actors in the public eye. They really are "asking for it"
You can't seem to drop it. I find it sad. But at least you find it funny, someone should.A few posts in this thread about her qualifies as 'obsession.'Okay there...
You keep replying to my posts, so that applies to both of us
That being said, let's steer this thread back to the OP's discussion.
Should there be nudity on STD? Nope. I'd be against it.
Will there be nudity on STD? Yes. More than likely. The horrific full frontal Klingon scene is proof that the producers want to push some boundaries, and the way they handle nudity on STD will fit in with the dark and demented tone of the series. It won't be good nudity. It won't be pleasant to see.
Demented?
Nudity is demented?
I have no issues with nudity. But most seen in American media is purely there for the male audience and generally extremely sexist. It's pure titillation and adds nothing to the story. It's just "look guys, boobs!" I would think that most men would be insulted by this pandering to their base instincts, but maybe they enjoy such simple pleasures. Given that Star Trek is usually written on a level that young teens can understand it, so I find it odd that they would choose to use nudity at all. Even the brief Klingon shot was an odd choice, especially since it was meant to be taken as a rape scene. It was a sick thing to sexualize.
I have no issues with nudity. But most seen in American media is purely there for the male audience and generally extremely sexist. It's pure titillation and adds nothing to the story. It's just "look guys, boobs!" I would think that most men would be insulted by this pandering to their base instincts, but maybe they enjoy such simple pleasures. Given that Star Trek is usually written on a level that young teens can understand it, so I find it odd that they would choose to use nudity at all. Even the brief Klingon shot was an odd choice, especially since it was meant to be taken as a rape scene. It was a sick thing to sexualize.
Last edited:
Demented and disturbing are understated descriptions for the L'Rell full frontal scene.
I have no doubt we'll get more nudity in line with that for S2.
Not nudity that can be sexualized, more like nudity that will make the audience feel grossed out.
I have no doubt we'll get more nudity in line with that for S2.
Not nudity that can be sexualized, more like nudity that will make the audience feel grossed out.
I wasn't grossed out by it. In fact, I forgot about how much we saw from Ash's flashbacks until reading this thread. It was so fast and not what I was focused on. Though I imagine it was easier to slip through a lot of people's radar since L'Rell is an alien.
But I'm suddenly reminded here of the TOS episode "Is There In Truth No Beauty?" Or the original "Planet of the Apes" when Taylor wanted to kiss Zira.
But I'm suddenly reminded here of the TOS episode "Is There In Truth No Beauty?" Or the original "Planet of the Apes" when Taylor wanted to kiss Zira.
Last edited:
Well, that certainly explains my location below my avatar.
Or my bad xD
I must have been watching another show.
Well, yes it is really. But that actually has nothing to do with the question under discussion.
We got that, problem is all that brings to the table is to lower people's opinions of you.
Kane is not the subject of this discussion. Just saying and no, I'm not mini-modding.
I'm assuming when you watch a lot of spy cams of celebrities, that's what you think full frontal is.
True
- Status
Similar threads
