![]()
there you go. was it good for you?
By boob I meant a colloquial word for a woman's breast, not an "informal" boob, as in "who is the boob that came up with that outfit?"
Last edited:
![]()
there you go. was it good for you?
It would look like a velociraptor trying to wipe its ass with a deep dish pizza.I want full-on, hard core graphic sex between a Gorn and a Horta!
Ariam walks by Saru. Saru's ganglia extend. Ariam notices, tilts her head, makes whirring noises.Are we sure that's not what we're actually seeing with the threat ganglia, and Saru was just covering for every time he got a Kelpian boner with a diversion to a fake threat?
Picard was nude in Chain of Command and that somethin' like 1993. 25 years ago now. It's old hat. I don't need to see it and I don't need to see it just for the sake of seeing it either.
It's not about whether one is a prude regards nudity. Same goes for the insert moment of cool profanity. It's the need to tick that box. That's why a character swearing on Discovery seemed out of place. Because it was. IF someone swears they tend to pepper their conversation here and there with it. So to be more realistic we actually should have had more casual profanity. Instead there was this one 'set up' scene that really seemed (to me) stupid and try hard. It didn't offend my delicate sensibilities just my appreciation for believable writing.Nudity doesn't bother me. But, I'm tired of treating it like a special event. It isn't.
In Star Trek everything is a major event. When Tilly (and everyone forgets Stamets) said the word "fuck" the Interwebz exploded. If/when we actually see some real boobs (i am not talking about klingon fake pair) the whole of internet Trek Fandom (so basically this forum, Reddit and couple youtubers) will lose it's collective mind.
I just think to have nudity JUST to see someone naked (read oooh I want to see Tilly naked or I want to see Ash naked) is cheap.
I don't like the character Tilly at all but it is not necessary to have her naked like it's another string to her bow. For some reason that attitude kind of irritated me today.I'd also like to think we can see the people whose professional role it is to act on the show as having slightly more worth than simply being there to take their clothes off for our gratification.
When someone says "I hope we see such a character naked" it sounds like a kid in a sweet shop pointing a grubby finger and saying "I want that one", treating that person as a thing to be consumed by an entitled child who sees them as nothing other than an object on the screen. There are plenty of places on the internet one can browse images of people and pick which one to reduce to nothing but flesh to drool over without people reducing trek to the same.
I'd also like to think we can see the people whose professional role it is to act on the show as having slightly more worth than simply being there to take their clothes off for our gratification
Why is it not hard canon?Klingons having two wangs is actually soft canon.
Why is it not hard canon?
Yes, that, as well. Which is why I think it is stupid, ridiculous and annoying.I just think to have nudity JUST to see someone naked (read oooh I want to see Tilly naked or I want to see Ash naked) is cheap.
Well, I would have broadened the spectrum of people who should be naked to include more than just Tilly if anyone else on the show was attractive.Yes, that, as well. Which is why I think it is stupid, ridiculous and annoying.
I'm down with this.You know if we are serious about nudity in season 2 we can do something about it. Lets pledge now to watch all season 2 episodes in the nude! Why do only the fictional characters get to wear their birthday suits during the episodes?
Jason
Lets pledge now to watch all season 2 episodes in the nude!
Right? I thought everyone did.You mean... you don't... already?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.