Like what? Peter not being some flat, pristine do-gooder?
Peter has always been a fairly pristine do-gooder. The one time he wasn't, his uncle died. his personal problems come from being too much of a hero, which effects his job, relationships, etc.
How? I liked May more here than in Raimi's movies or ASM. Zendaya was hardly in the film and was way more tolerable than Raimi's MJ.
May in Raimi's movies was great. In Homecoming she isn't May, she's some hip woman who shares nothing with any version of May, even Bendis's shit Ultimate May. I'm all for making May a bit less frail, and I'm fine if she's a bit younger, but the May in HC is just shit. Partially its a bad choice for actress, but the writing is the big issue.
Hey, you take away toys from someone who breaks the rules. That's the point of punishment.
Or maybe your shitty limo driver answers his fucking phone and tells the hero that they're doing something about the obvious major problem the person found. Tony and Happy are responsiblew for that Ferry problem, Peter did what he should have done, tried to stop bad guys that the big heroes seemed to be ignoring. It would have taken less then a minute to call Peter, tell them they got his warnings and that the authorities were on the case. But, they didn't. Presumably just because Happy doesn't like Peter and didn't want to talk to him.
That was the whole point to his character in the first place, instead of how the earlier Spidey movies wasted the Teen years. This isn't DC with their "perfect person" archetypes.
nope, it isn't. Peter was a teenager for around 28 issues in the fucking 60s. He graduated when my mother was in Kindergarten, and that was that. Until that pile of shit "Ultimate Spider-Man" came out, I'm pretty sure no one had really thought of Peter as a teenager for decades.
Beh, that's exactly why I DIDN'T like the Teen Titans.
Good for you. A very, very large group of Titans fans don't agree.
The Kelly Sue DeConnick run of Captain Marvel had a very quirky sense of humor it would make sense for this movie to emulate. For those complaining about humor in this movie, I'm curious which runs of the character they've actually read.
I've read every Carol Danvers run except for her very first solo title. Her second Ms. marvel book was the best, and most of her 2-3 Captain Marvel titled books have been generally mediocre. Some good ideas (like running the new version of SWORD), but a lot of bad (the amnesia from a brain tumor subplot that got ignored almost immediately, Carol becoming a fascist psychopath in Civil War II, etc). Really, they should just ignore individual runs and kind of just cherry pick good stuff, if they cared about making a good Carol danvers movie, which they don't.
