Exactly so.![]()
Just what DSC needs, more amazing episodes like Tin Man...
;-)
Exactly so.![]()
And actually if Sarek and Burnham walked onto the Enterprise bridge in the season 2 premier
Except that you are not really taking into consideration the differences in psychology for a 'alien warrior race'. In such a scenario it could be argued to be more likely that the Klingons would see themselves as having been bested in fair combat and would have surrendered themselves after such a humiliation as they could potentially see themselves collectively as unworthy failures and deserved of death.
Nope, not buying it. We know that, at least in theory, Klingons think it's honorable to go out in a blaze of glory against overwhelming odds. Being defeated strategically due to a terrorist action behind enemy lines isn't going to make them be all like "okay, that was awesome dudes, you win this time, good game!"
We know that, at least in theory, Klingons think it's honorable to go out in a blaze of glory against overwhelming odds
I want to see Robert Bathurst just wonder down one of the ships corridors in his dressing gown.No he can't die yet! Not until Matt Berry has a guest role on Discovery and they get to interact.
Nope, not buying it. We know that, at least in theory, Klingons think it's honorable to go out in a blaze of glory against overwhelming odds. Being defeated strategically due to a terrorist action behind enemy lines isn't going to make them be all like "okay, that was awesome dudes, you win this time, good game!"
But they also know when they are at a strategic disadvantage. If Discovery can take out one world, it can continue to do so, potentially, assuming that there is even just one ship that is capable of that (they don't know that for certain). So they have to regroup, and can only due so under a central authority. In the end L'Rell is not just a good pick because she can blow up their homeworld, but because she's not really tired to any major faction, but still has plenty of good intel and experience with all the factions. She's the Evan McMullin of the Klingon Empire.Nope, not buying it. We know that, at least in theory, Klingons think it's honorable to go out in a blaze of glory against overwhelming odds. Being defeated strategically due to a terrorist action behind enemy lines isn't going to make them be all like "okay, that was awesome dudes, you win this time, good game!"
Let's be honest these klingons are pretty one dimensional and stupid.
Think of the parallels with Imperial Japan's acquiescence and surrender during WW2 after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were completely humiliated and became submissive to the conquering power.
Agreed. It'll either be because MU Lorca fell into the mycelial thing. Or, they find PU Lorca--either as a Klingon prisoner in the PU or somewhere in hiding in the MU.Lorca will be back. Somehow. You just know it will happen.
L'Rell might help explain why women can't serve on the High Council in the TNG era. After L'Rell (IF she unites all the houses, reinstates the High Council and assumes the Chancellorship, and that's a big if) and then Azetbur the Empire might have had their fill of what they see as "inferior" female leadership for their own sexist and cultural reasons that would be idiotic but hold water in their government.
Yes, totally agree. I like most of the decisions that the Discovery showrunners have made, but the Klingons--not so much.I hope we don’t see any Klingons at all next season.
Or it was dumb idea in the first place.Or she is so highly regarded no woman can take her place.
Hitting the shipyards and aircraft factories, as well as, refineries, would have made their conduct of the war inefficient. Not to mention the understanding they were facing a weapon they had no counter to, and never would be able to develop one before their country was incinerated. Even if extremist elements of the empire wanted to press on, it would have made little difference.As I said in the other thread, the difference is that Japan was bombed after it had effectively lost the war and had been fought back to its historic boundaries. If we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1941 or 1942, I'm not sure it would have ended the war so quickly.
Yeah, I caught that, but I couldn't tell if there were any other easter eggs there other than the Trill.
As I said in the other thread, the difference is that Japan was bombed after it had effectively lost the war and had been fought back to its historic boundaries. If we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1941 or 1942, I'm not sure it would have ended the war so quickly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.