Fair point, I guess. I'd just figured it would be most reasonable to assume that Lorca's universe-switch corresponded to the destruction of the ship, if only because that would be the point at which it would have been easiest for him to fake his way through the switch without detection. After all, if everyone who's known or worked with you any time recently is dead, you can get away with a lot more in terms of papering over minor personality inconsistencies. (Which, okay, would be very convenient for the writers, but they're not above that.) So if the Buran's destruction occurred early in the Klingon war (IIRC), wouldn't it have been easier just to have him mention a span of less than a year?Doesn't mean [the Buran's descruction is] when Lorca switched over, he could have been on the Buran for a long time before that - he may even have brought about its destruction in order to get a post on Discovery with the spore drive.
Further thought: on the MU side, maybe I'm misremembering, but weren't we previously told that it was Burnham and the Shenzou that were present for the battle after which Lorca was presumed dead — not the Charon, as in this episode's flashback? If so, that means the PU Lorca must have survived for at least some amount of time in the MU before its final destruction, also apparently without being detected as a substitute. How plausible is that? (And if we do accept it, does it increase the odds that he's managed to survive out there somewhere?)
Basically, the whole backstory on the switch is still seeming like an afterthought on the writers' part, which is frankly inexcusable.
Maybe. But that would be one really weirdly specific-yet-ambiguous bit of dialogue. Not the sort of thing an actual person would be likely to say, yet also not relevant to the plot, so one is just left wondering...Or he may have been saying "One year - strike that, 212 days to be accurate". Seven months of Lorca aboard the Discovery would suffice for our dramatic needs nicely enough.

Last edited: