Ah, Enterprise on TrekBBS. Has anyone mentioned "The Interregnum" yet?
I adored that show, and I was always so upset with the haters. There was, indeed, a much richer diversity among Enterprise haters than among Disco haters... and even the fans (who were very numerous, at least on this board) were deeply divided about what made the show good (particularly if you were fool enough to cross a shipper).
My gut sense, though, is that Disco is just as polarizing (in the sense that both its haters and fans are passionate, vocal, and numerous), but we see less diversity on both sides because there just aren't as many Disco viewers. Not as many people care about it as cared about Enterprise in its heyday, so it's just not possible for Discovery to be as polarizing. We know without a doubt that Discovery's first season viewer averages are well under half of Enterprise's. (ENT S1 averaged 6 million viewers, and CBSAA only was 2 million subscribers at last report, so a more realistic estimate would be 20-30% of ENT's audience.) And, just going back and looking at the board archives from the old days -- even deep into Enterprise's decline -- it just looks a lot more lively in there. Their review threads are a lot smaller than the Disco review threads, but the range of things people want to discuss in a zillion other threads is... well, it strikes me as more energetic than the Disco boards are. Some of that's just because threads on the old board were less consolidated than they are today, but I think some is just because there were more fans and haters coming at it from more perspectives.
(And, honestly, looking at those thread titles, it sure looks to me like there's more positivity about the show in that forum than in this one.)
But other posters are right that this pretty much happens every single time anything new happens in Star Trek, and we somehow forget it as soon as the next polarizing installment comes along. Something I wrote a while back when someone asked me if Trek fandom had become less "welcoming" since the Abrams movies:
I stand by that. I can't stand Discovery ("and it breaks canon all over the place!") but it's still Star Trek as long as CBS deems it so, and the people who love it are still just as much "real" Star Trek fans as anyone else.
I used to believe this about haters as well. Now, contrary to all my hopes, I have become a hater of Discovery, and I find (on self-reflection) that these explanations do not ring true for me. I have no love for conflict -- not for its own sake. I know the production team isn't reading the BBS. And I know my Internet rants aren't going to end the show, nor even measurably harm it.
Yet I've never seriously considered dropping the show. And then I watch it, and it makes me upset, and I feel compelled to vent about it to someone.
Why? I don't know. I could drop the show. I could watch it and then just not get upset about it, like a normal functioning human. Or I could vent my outrage about a silly TV show into my pillow rather than putting it up online. This whole pattern of behavior strikes me as completely irrational. Yet I keep doing it, I don't really understand why, and, on several levels, I am genuinely concerned about that.
My current working theory is that this impulse is the mirror counterpart of that urge you get after you watch something really good: you want to share that feeling with other people, you want them to say to you, "Man, I loved that!" and thank you for helping them find it, you want to shout from the rooftops about how X is great -- even though that, too, is pretty irrational when you get right down to it. Many people, on a deep level, (apparently including me!) don't want to just have feelings; they want to share their opinions, validate their opinions, and build communities around shared opinions. Maybe that impulse is what builds fandom, why we have things like conventions and the TrekBBS at all.
But now I have these strongly negative feelings, and my desire to share, validate, and community-build with them isn't going away. So I don't just go away like a sensible person, repeat the MST3K mantra to myself, and find the next season of The Expanse. I turn into a full-blown anti-fan who goes on boards and tries to convince people their enjoyment of the show is wrong, and I keep watching because my anti-fandom is now one of my communities.
I dunno. I could be wrong. I still don't like haters (even though I am one now) but I am starting to understand them a bit better. I'll keep you posted.
I adored that show, and I was always so upset with the haters. There was, indeed, a much richer diversity among Enterprise haters than among Disco haters... and even the fans (who were very numerous, at least on this board) were deeply divided about what made the show good (particularly if you were fool enough to cross a shipper).
My gut sense, though, is that Disco is just as polarizing (in the sense that both its haters and fans are passionate, vocal, and numerous), but we see less diversity on both sides because there just aren't as many Disco viewers. Not as many people care about it as cared about Enterprise in its heyday, so it's just not possible for Discovery to be as polarizing. We know without a doubt that Discovery's first season viewer averages are well under half of Enterprise's. (ENT S1 averaged 6 million viewers, and CBSAA only was 2 million subscribers at last report, so a more realistic estimate would be 20-30% of ENT's audience.) And, just going back and looking at the board archives from the old days -- even deep into Enterprise's decline -- it just looks a lot more lively in there. Their review threads are a lot smaller than the Disco review threads, but the range of things people want to discuss in a zillion other threads is... well, it strikes me as more energetic than the Disco boards are. Some of that's just because threads on the old board were less consolidated than they are today, but I think some is just because there were more fans and haters coming at it from more perspectives.
(And, honestly, looking at those thread titles, it sure looks to me like there's more positivity about the show in that forum than in this one.)
But other posters are right that this pretty much happens every single time anything new happens in Star Trek, and we somehow forget it as soon as the next polarizing installment comes along. Something I wrote a while back when someone asked me if Trek fandom had become less "welcoming" since the Abrams movies:
The Internet is a terrible place, where the fights are always elevated above the inclusiveness. Go to a convention, or get involved in a dedicated fan project like Farragut or Excelsior, and you will (probably) have a very different experience.
That said, yes, there's always been an element of the fandom that's like this, at least as long as there has been a fandom. A brief timeline:
2009: "Abramstrek is just Star Wars with a Trek label slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
2005: "'These Are The Voyages' never happened. Period. We will never speak of it again, and, if you speak of it, I will never speak of you again. "
2003: "The Xindi Arc is just 24 with a Star Trek label slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong.*
2001: "Enterprise NX-01 is just an upside-down Akira-class with a terrible theme song slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1998: "Recent Voyager is just TNG with Seven's tits slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1997: "Recent Deep Space Nine has turned Gene Roddenberry's vision on its head: religion? A war? The Great Bird must be spinning in his grave! And it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1995: "This new Voyager show is just a Battlestar Galactica rehash with Neelix's terrifying warthog-head slapped on. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1993: "This new DS9 show is just Babylon 5 with literally nothing slapped on. It's just B5 on a different network, guys. All hail J Michael Stracynzki! ...but if you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1992: "Now that Gene Roddenberry is dead, TNG can't claim to be true Trek anymore."
1987: "NextGen is like Fred Freiburger's Star Trek with a cheese-eating French surrender monkey slapped on (as captain!), and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong!"
1982: "Did you hear they kicked Gene Roddenberry off production of the new movie? And now The Wrath of Khan is just Moby Dick with murdering Spock in cold blood slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place! If you think that's real Star Trek, you're EVIL!"
1979: "The new movie is an embarrassment. It's just Star Wars with a Trek label slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place. If you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1977: "Xon? XON? If you think that could ever be real Star Trek, without Spock on the bridge, you are WRONNNG."
1973: "The Filmation animated series is just a Saturday morning adventure show with the Trek label slapped on, and it breaks canon all over the place (have you seen the Larry Niven crossover yet?!). Gene Roddenberry may want to sell merch, but if you think that's real Star Trek, you're wrong."
1968: "'Spock's Brain' was the season premiere. If you think the third season of Star Trek is real Star Trek, you're just wrong."
Basically, there's a certain kind of fan who accepts everything that existed when they joined the fandom as Sacred and Canonical and Wonderful, and then rejects everything that comes after.
Don't be that fan.
(Of course, you don't have to accept everything. "These Are The Voyages" is an abomination that cries out to Heaven for vengeance, and, while I liked the first AbramsTrek movie, Into Darkness was terrible. You just have to be open to everything -- and you have to accept that you're going to love some stuff and hate other stuff, but it's all still real Star Trek whether you like it or not. And you have GOT to accept that canon is more flexible than you think.)
I stand by that. I can't stand Discovery ("and it breaks canon all over the place!") but it's still Star Trek as long as CBS deems it so, and the people who love it are still just as much "real" Star Trek fans as anyone else.
It's like I've said before though, the people who keep watching and relentlessly complain at every given opportunity are usually driven by 1 or 2 big things:
1. They like conflict, especially (most likely exclusively) the conflict that the anonymity and safety of a message board gives you. Why otherwise does it make any sense to torture yourself with what you don't like and then compound that by going on to a message board filled with people that have opposing opinions, and bang away at them as if you're going to change their minds?
2. They genuinely feel that someone from the "studio" or the "production team" is there, taking notes, and will see their loud and vocal minority complaints, and certainly change the show to be more to their liking in the coming seasons.
2a. They actually believe that if they are loud and vocal enough...the show will fail and they will get something more to their liking as a result of the vacuum that is created.
I used to believe this about haters as well. Now, contrary to all my hopes, I have become a hater of Discovery, and I find (on self-reflection) that these explanations do not ring true for me. I have no love for conflict -- not for its own sake. I know the production team isn't reading the BBS. And I know my Internet rants aren't going to end the show, nor even measurably harm it.
Yet I've never seriously considered dropping the show. And then I watch it, and it makes me upset, and I feel compelled to vent about it to someone.
Why? I don't know. I could drop the show. I could watch it and then just not get upset about it, like a normal functioning human. Or I could vent my outrage about a silly TV show into my pillow rather than putting it up online. This whole pattern of behavior strikes me as completely irrational. Yet I keep doing it, I don't really understand why, and, on several levels, I am genuinely concerned about that.
My current working theory is that this impulse is the mirror counterpart of that urge you get after you watch something really good: you want to share that feeling with other people, you want them to say to you, "Man, I loved that!" and thank you for helping them find it, you want to shout from the rooftops about how X is great -- even though that, too, is pretty irrational when you get right down to it. Many people, on a deep level, (apparently including me!) don't want to just have feelings; they want to share their opinions, validate their opinions, and build communities around shared opinions. Maybe that impulse is what builds fandom, why we have things like conventions and the TrekBBS at all.
But now I have these strongly negative feelings, and my desire to share, validate, and community-build with them isn't going away. So I don't just go away like a sensible person, repeat the MST3K mantra to myself, and find the next season of The Expanse. I turn into a full-blown anti-fan who goes on boards and tries to convince people their enjoyment of the show is wrong, and I keep watching because my anti-fandom is now one of my communities.
I dunno. I could be wrong. I still don't like haters (even though I am one now) but I am starting to understand them a bit better. I'll keep you posted.