i think that notion has been throughly debated here and the verdict is:
![]()
prolly.
I'd miss it if it was over. I was completely entertained by the three Abrams films. In the end, they will probably end up far more entertaining than Discovery.
i think that notion has been throughly debated here and the verdict is:
![]()
prolly.
i hope it's not over too, but star trek beyond isn't the worst place to see the story end. we got three pretty tight movies that work well together and can be their own thing. i can live with that.I'd miss it if it was over. I was completely entertained by the three Abrams films. In the end, they will probably end up far more entertaining than Discovery.
Shhhhhh!I have a feeling this version of the film franchise is dead.
They want their Cardassian Sunrises back.Make the Cardassians the main villains in a movie for once!
It would be really depressing it ends with beyond, especially when it did so little with the characters still and the enterprise was a relict for 99% of the movie... and we never saw her in her five years mission exploring new worlds, and we never really saw most of the ship and life in space.I have a feeling this version of the film franchise is dead.
Title explains it all. I'm tired of the "bad guy wants revenge" plots. I was thinking something like the Doomsday machine, combined with the Guardian of Forever as a plot device to bring George Kirk back, as he's rumored to return. Dad Kirk and Son Kirk team up to stop the Doomsday Machine. Could be cool.
The 1986 movie was Star Trek IV, in keeping with the TOS-film convention of using Roman numerals for all outings following TMP.Should be called "Star Trek 14" not Star Trek 4, 4 came out in 1986.
So…TOS.I've said it a hundred times, and I'll say it again (because you asked):
"Yesterday's Kelvin."
To what? The Discovery timeline where everything looks totally different to TOS?Hopefully some way to restore the timeline...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.