If there can be what, twentyish? superhero shows on simultaneously, I'm sure a few spacey shows won't hurt each other much...
There are too many superhero shows on at the moment and I might be dropping one, just because there's so much limited time.
If there can be what, twentyish? superhero shows on simultaneously, I'm sure a few spacey shows won't hurt each other much...
I think part of the issue is that there has become this alarming trend of wanting to compartmentalize what a series is. There isn't any real desire (nor ability in today's TV audience) to be able to switch gears while watching a TV series. It has to be one way and that's it. Many people can't get their head around a show that can have adventure and use a lighter touch to it.I know some of the critics accuse Orville of "not knowing what it wants to be". I am not sure what that really means. There are plenty of shows that combine different elements like humor and drama. Stargate SG1 combined fun, campy moments with some very emotional serious moments (for example: Jacob's death). Futurama combined humor with some serious emotional moments (for ex: Fry's dog waiting for him). It is certainly possible to have both.
Which is fine. The point is you have a diverse selection of shows to choose from. No one is saying you have to watch all of them and the same is true for space-faring shows.There are too many superhero shows on at the moment and I might be dropping one, just because there's so much limited time.
So as far as Alara. Shouldn't a species from a planet with higher gravity be shorter and more muscular and have a higher mass?
When Alara knocks that door down, she would seem to have a lot more mass/weight. We know the Hulk can do that jump/flight thing like Alara did.
Unfortunately, some Trek fans aren't feeling that way. They think that if you watch The Orville, you're betraying Star Trek. Got my head ripped off on Twitter for thanking The Orville folks for putting on a fun Sci-Fi series to go with Trek (which looks to be of a serious tone).Which is fine. The point is you have a diverse selections of shows to choose from. No one is saying you have to watch all of them and the same is true for space-faring shows.
So as far as Alara. Shouldn't a species from a planet with higher gravity be shorter and more muscular and have a higher mass?
When Alara knocks that door down, she would seem to have a lot more mass/weight. We know the Hulk can do that jump/flight thing like Alara did.
If I may continue your comic book analogy, Alara is more like Golden Age Superman or Supergirl. GA Kryptonians, though otherwise completely human, were physically superior to natives of Earth because Krypton's much heavier gravity made them all stronger, their muscles having evolved and adapted to the greater resistance.
I think if the Orville was being insulting to Trek, then I can see how watching it could be seen as betraying Trek. But that is not the caseUnfortunately, some Trek fans aren't feeling that way. They think that if you watch The Orville, you're betraying Star Trek. Got my head ripped off on Twitter for thanking The Orville folks for putting on a fun Sci-Fi series to go with Trek (which looks to be of a serious tone).
OK, I thought maybe you didn't know about them.I ran out of steam on The Expanse, and have never seen Killjoys.
I would actually love to have a detailed discussion about this sort of thing in a separate thread. Would you join in if I started one?The problem is that The Orville is Star Trek in space. It doesn't add anything significantly original. Not only is it Star Trek but it has very close analogues down to the character level with the android being like Data and Bortus being Worf. So it has a decidedly cover-version or knock-off feel to it, just as much as the new "serial number free" Renegades. Then add in crewmembers who worked on Trek and you really are skirting close to the line.
The creator of the two games is the same, but I'm pretty sure the copyrights for the two games are owned by different publishers.Bioshock was made by the same people who made Systemshock 2.
Dark Matter?I ran out of steam on The Expanse, and have never seen Killjoys.
I've already dropped Arrow.There are too many superhero shows on at the moment and I might be dropping one, just because there's so much limited time.
Well, if she's anything like Star Trek: New Frontier's Zak Kebron (who I keep thinking of in comparison to her), then perhaps she wears a special gravity belt that allows her to compensate for local gravity.So as far as Alara. Shouldn't a species from a planet with higher gravity be shorter and more muscular and have a higher mass?
When Alara knocks that door down, she would seem to have a lot more mass/weight. We know the Hulk can do that jump/flight thing like Alara did.
Well, that's just plain obnoxious and those kind of people should be ignored.Unfortunately, some Trek fans aren't feeling that way. They think that if you watch The Orville, you're betraying Star Trek. Got my head ripped off on Twitter for thanking The Orville folks for putting on a fun Sci-Fi series to go with Trek (which looks to be of a serious tone).
He was only introduced as the second officer which really isn't a thing.
Not necessarily. We have things like elephants and giraffes right here in the same 1G environment. Being stout or spindly is not wholly dependent on the gravitational pull.So as far as Alara. Shouldn't a species from a planet with higher gravity be shorter and more muscular and have a higher mass?
I think if the Orville was being insulting to Trek, then I can see how watching it could be seen as betraying Trek.
You can't "betray Trek." Trek does not care.
Pretty sure he was wondering what Bortas' actual job on the ship is, not the chain of command. Which "second officer" doesn't tell you.Lt Cmd Data would like to have a word with you about second officer (who are the 3rd most senior officer aboard a vessel after the captain and first officer/executive officer).
I meant as a standalone job. Data was also the operations officer.Lt Cmd Data would like to have a word with you about second officer (who are the 3rd most senior officer aboard a vessel after the captain and first officer/executive officer).
Unfortunately, some Trek fans aren't feeling that way. They think that if you watch The Orville, you're betraying Star Trek. Got my head ripped off on Twitter for thanking The Orville folks for putting on a fun Sci-Fi series to go with Trek (which looks to be of a serious tone).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.