In the future we still have hot glue guns. That's like flash bangs still being used in the future of "Serenity". Yup, glue technology doesn't progress any further once you reach hot glue guns.
Oh, yeah. Orville uniforms have pockets!
Hell, even the U.S. Navy uniforms has pockets...but then they yell at you for resting your hands in them. I would love to see that happen in this show.I bet the actors love that. Trek actors often complain that their uniforms didn't have pockets.
I meant "Star Trek Underwater" in the same way one could call Firefly "Gunsmoke in Space" or something like that: a quick way to give you an idea of what the show is about, but no necessarily the implication of outright plagiarism. Contrast this with Bioshock, which is literally just "Systemshock 2 underwater"
I assume he's the tactical officer based on his position on the bridge, but I could be wrong. He was only introduced as the second officer which really isn't a thing.By the way, What are Bortas's responsibilities on the ship? As second officer we see him take command when Ed and Kelly are off ship but what does he do the rest of the time?
They definitely laid the groundwork for some of the upcoming episodes this season in the pilot.
Some things have probably already reached their evolutionary apex. Glue guns...seat belts...Velcro...In the future we still have hot glue guns. That's like flash bangs still being used in the future of "Serenity". Yup, glue technology doesn't progress any further once you reach hot glue guns.
IIRC, Scotty was considered "second officer" in TOS (and Sulu the third), although I don't remember if there was actual dialog to that effect.I assume he's the tactical officer based on his position on the bridge, but I could be wrong. He was only introduced as the second officer which really isn't a thing.
I meant "Star Trek Underwater" in the same way one could call Firefly "Gunsmoke in Space" or something like that: a quick way to give you an idea of what the show is about, but no necessarily the implication of outright plagiarism.
The fact that the prime demographic of The Orville is disaffected Trek fans who will tune into that rather than Discovery...
I think the prime audience is space adventure fans, which there is an incredible lack of in the market. I know that I'm not disaffected. There is room for two space adventures in my life.
Were you aware of who was making it?I was giving it a try, same as everybody.
Bioshock was made by the same people who made Systemshock 2.I meant "Star Trek Underwater" in the same way one could call Firefly "Gunsmoke in Space" or something like that: a quick way to give you an idea of what the show is about, but no necessarily the implication of outright plagiarism. Contrast this with Bioshock, which is literally just "Systemshock 2 underwater". I don't know how they didn't get sued.
.
I find it really hard to believe that this would have made it past the development stage if there was even a chance that this was going to be sued. It was developed very much out in the open, and never hid what it was. I find it very, very hard to believe that CBS didn't know about it, and I'm pretty sure they would have put a stop to it long before it made it to air if they had a problem with it.Saying something is this in that is actually a sign of originality as everything is a remix.
What's Star Trek if not Horatio Hornblower in space or wagon train to the stars?
The problem is that The Orville is Star Trek in space. It doesn't add anything significantly original. Not only is it Star Trek but it has very close analogues down to the character level with the android being like Data and Bortus being Worf. So it has a decidedly cover-version or knock-off feel to it, just as much as the new "serial number free" Renegades. Then add in crewmembers who worked on Trek and you really are skirting close to the line.
The fact that the prime demographic of The Orville is disaffected Trek fans who will tune into that rather than Discovery, and that Seth is playing up the tonal differences, is a clear signal that Fox wants to position the show as an alternate slant on Star Trek, not dissimilar to Axanar's proclamation that it was the "one true Trek".
The only thing IP holders care about is the bottom line. If they feel that another company is undercutting their IP by producing a thinly veiled knock-off then I'd say they have a case. Similarity is not simply a matter of terminology. That's why so much of Axanar's litigation pointed out the Vulcan ears and what not. It's the entire package.
Do I want to see Fox get sued? Not really, but if they do, I will not be rushing to their defense because they simply did not try hard enough to create something that people would treat as its own IP rather than very thinly disguised Trek. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a duck! A rose by any other name is a rose.
![]()
What about The Expanse and Killjoys?I think the prime audience is space adventure fans, which there is an incredible lack of in the market. I know that I'm not disaffected. There is room for two space adventures in my life.
I plan on watching both and I hope to enjoy Discovery at least as much as I did The Orville.Agreed. As I stated before, I think Discovery and Orville are very different shows that are not muturally exclusive in their appeal. Discovery looks to be a serious, dark, exciting drama while Orville is a light hearted, fun show. If you want "serious Star Trek" watch Discovery and if you want "fun Star Trek", watch Orville. It's actually kinda perfect.
Indeed. I'm looking forward to Discovery, but Orville is already on my "now I have to watch this every week" list.I think the prime audience is space adventure fans, which there is an incredible lack of in the market. I know that I'm not disaffected. There is room for two space adventures in my life.
What about The Expanse and Killjoys?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.