• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Seth MacFarlane’s The Orville

Very glad the ratings and demos are extremely good. Fully expecting an inevitable overall drop as the show progresses, but at least it's starting off with a bang. Good first step to take towards a hopeful second season. :)
 
Ah - fair enough. That makes sense, yes. I was referring to the most recent incarnations. The Trolls movie was a fairly big hit last year and the Smurf property owners clearly wanted to play catch-up by making a similar over-saturated and trippy CG song-fest with happy little creatures.
I'm not sure how much Dreamwork's Trolls had to do with it. I think people were already suggesting that they just make a fully animated film after the first two movies, and color over/undersaturation has been a problem in Hollywood since they discovered color correction in O Brother, Where Art Thou?.
 
I'm already expecting to love Bortus. I'm expecting him to have a lot of stone faced lines that will actually be quite funny.
 
It was a ship to surface shuttle.
Speaking of Copyrights.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Wow! That was certainly clever and creative - in that it had absolutely NOTHING original in it!

No, they could not be sued. You can't be sued just for doing a show that is similar to another show. You get sued when you actually use copyrighted terms like "star trek", "starfleet", or "vulcan" and try to profit from it because that is a violation of Intellectual Property.
Individual words and terms are generally not copyrighted, but can be trademarks. Copyright goes a lot deeper than you imply here. For example (sans permission) you can't just take the script to "Journey to Babel", change the names of all the characters, alien races, ships, etc. and re-shoot it as a new show, as that would still have substantial similarity to the original. You also can't make sequels, at least ones that rely heavily on the original, as these are derivative works.
 
Individual words and terms are generally not copyrighted, but can be trademarks. Copyright goes a lot deeper than you imply here. For example (sans permission) you can't just take the script to "Journey to Babel", change the names of all the characters, alien races, ships, etc. and re-shoot it as a new show, as that would still have substantial similarity to the original. You also can't make sequels, at least ones that rely heavily on the original, as these are derivative works.

All true. Obviously, you can't reshoot the script from Journey to Babel with some name changes because that would be plagiarism. My point is that a show cannot be sued just because it follows a similar format to another show. General concepts like spaceships having adventures in space or medieval kings waging war for control of the kingdom are not trademarked as far as I know. It is when you get into the details that trademarks and copyrights become an issue.

Also, I was responding specifically to the claim that SeaQuest DSV could be sued for ripping off Star Trek because the show was essentially "Star Trek underwater" as one poster put it. I disagree because I think there are enough differences between Star Trek and SeaQuest that they would be safe from a lawsuit.
 
All true. Obviously, you can't reshoot the script from Journey to Babel with some name changes because that would be plagiarism. My point is that a show cannot be sued just because it follows a similar format to another show. General concepts like spaceships having adventures in space or medieval kings waging war for control of the kingdom are not trademarked as far as I know. It is when you get into the details that trademarks and copyrights become an issue.

Also, I was responding specifically to the claim that SeaQuest DSV could be sued for ripping off Star Trek because the show was essentially "Star Trek underwater" as one poster put it. I disagree because I think there are enough differences between Star Trek and SeaQuest that they would be safe from a lawsuit.
Agreed all 'round.

Oh, yeah. Orville uniforms have pockets!
What are these "pockets" you speak of?
 
Also, I was responding specifically to the claim that SeaQuest DSV could be sued for ripping off Star Trek because the show was essentially "Star Trek underwater" as one poster put it. I disagree because I think there are enough differences between Star Trek and SeaQuest that they would be safe from a lawsuit.
I meant "Star Trek Underwater" in the same way one could call Firefly "Gunsmoke in Space" or something like that: a quick way to give you an idea of what the show is about, but no necessarily the implication of outright plagiarism. Contrast this with Bioshock, which is literally just "Systemshock 2 underwater". I don't know how they didn't get sued.
If the seeds can grow anywhere under any condition...wouldn't they grow in your stomach if you ate them?
Tardigrades are vulnerable to stomach acid, at least when they're not in their cryptobiotic state.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top