• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Should TMP be ignored?

For all we argue, neither side really has anything concrete to go on about Kirk post-TMP.

I just think it is really unimaginative that he commanded another five-year mission with the same old gang. So I go with he was off commanding a Starbase or something similar. Scott returns to Earth to help update the rest of the fleet. McCoy and Spock teach at the Academy. The rest take off in different directions.
And someone else command the Enterprise. Never!
Just can't see it happening.
And Picard had the same gang for 7 years or more didn't he? And Pike had command of the Enterprise for at least 13 years.
But you're right anything could have happened. I've read some novels set in a post-TMP 5YM but they're not canon either.
 
Spock. Spock was the captain of the Enterprise during TWOK, we get no indication how long he has been in command, it could be since shortly after TMP.
Spock doesn't count. He's one of Kirk boyz. He can't wait to give Kirk back command.
He's just minding the Enterprise until Kirk comes to his senses. IMO.
 
Spock doesn't count. He's one of Kirk boyz. He can't wait to give Kirk back command.
He's just minding the Enterprise until Kirk comes to his senses. IMO.
Pretty much.
SPOCK: As a teacher on a training mission, I am content to command the Enterprise. If we are to go on actual duty, it is clear that the senior officer on board must assume command.
 
I don't believe that's quite what we know from on-screen information.
It depends on how many years into Kirk's 5YM "The Menagerie" takes place. Pike was captain thirteen years prior, and Kirk took over the enterprise directly from Pike.

Kor
 
Well, Spock served with Pike 11 years (4 months, 5 days). The Menagerie takes place 13 years after The Cage.

Assuming Spock is fairly new to the Enterprise (I'm putting him at about 20 based on Yesteryear being 3 years after The Menagerie) then that puts the end of Spock serving with Pike at most at around 2-3 years before The Menagerie.

That would jibe with Kirk taking the Enterprise and having been her CO for a little while before WNMHGB. The unaired opening narration to WNM indicates that they had been performing other routine duties before attempting to leave the galaxy.

But Pike was captain of some sort for long enough that he wanted to quit by The Cage. If we guess that that couldn't have been right when he took command of the Enterprise, then we at least know that he was captain for well over 11 or 12 years. 13 is as likely as 16 at that point.

Hunter was around 38 when he made The Cage. There is lore that Kirk was the youngest starship captain. So if we figure Pike is around the same age as Hunter then Pike would have been a captain no earlier than 32ish? So the longest he could have been captain of the Enterprise would be 17 years? Using some significant WAGs, of course.

What does the "official" timeline say?

(Lotta math in this thread.)
 
Well, Spock served with Pike 11 years (4 months, 5 days). The Menagerie takes place 13 years after The Cage.

Agreed on those facts. But what information do we have that Pike (and Spock) served all that time on the Enterprise, as opposed to (say) being transferred over to the Bradbury and then back again?
 
That would jibe with Kirk taking the Enterprise and having been her CO for a little while before WNMHGB. The unaired opening narration to WNM indicates that they had been performing other routine duties before attempting to leave the galaxy.
Looking at the times mentioned. Spock serving with Pike for 11 years, 4 months and 5 days. The Cage taking place 13 years ago. And Kirk taking command directly from Pike. Would that mean Kirk had been in command of the Enterprise for 1 year, 7 months and 26 days at the time of The Menagerie?
 
Looking at the times mentioned. Spock serving with Pike for 11 years, 4 months and 5 days. The Cage taking place 13 years ago. And Kirk taking command directly from Pike. Would that mean Kirk had been in command of the Enterprise for 1 year, 7 months and 26 days at the time of The Menagerie?
According to the final draft script of "Court Martial," Kirk was 19 months into his five-year mission at the time of that episode, which was right before "The Menagerie" in production order:
Commodore Stone: You've been up there 19 months on this last mission... you've taken no furlough... had virtually no rest at all in that time. You're played out... exhausted.
 
According to the final draft script of "Court Martial," Kirk was 19 months into his five-year mission at the time of that episode, which was right before "The Menagerie" in production order:

Commodore Stone: You've been up there 19 months on this last mission... you've taken no furlough... had virtually no rest at all in that time. You're played out... exhausted.

That dialog didn't make it into the episode, though.

This is how it aired, according to http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/15.htm:

STONE: Stop recording. Now, look, Jim. Not one man in a million could do what you and I have done. Command a starship. A hundred decisions a day, hundreds of lives staked on you making every one of them right. You're played out, Jim. Exhausted.​
 
The most important unansawered question is... If TMP never happened, then what the hell are all of the events that bridge the end of TOS and TWOK???? Every single character has an open empty narrative, that eventually brings them back to "Any chance to go on board the Enterprise..." as a rare comment.
 
Are you suggesting it could be that Pike was promoted to admiral and after 2.5 years felt restless and got himself demoted back to captain? ;)
Yes. I just wanted to trick someone else into saying it first, so I looked innocent in this deviltry.
 
Yes. I just wanted to trick someone else into saying it first, so I looked innocent in this deviltry.
Happy to help.

Yeah, I know. I just thought it was interesting to note.
It certainly shows the mindset of the writers that the ship hadn't just begun its mission when the show started.

BTW, when we saw TWOK on Sunday I heard many people muttering "Hey! I thought he was going to be captain again after the last movie! This makes no sense!"

....

Ok, I made that last part up.
 
After all, we got an interesting (and in my opinion really good) explanation for the absence of George Kirk's two other children during the Deneva incident.

Why should they need to be Sam's kids? Kirk never specified whether he had sisters.

Or another brother, even. Our heroes really don't like to talk about their families.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Why should they need to be Sam's kids? Kirk never specified whether he had sisters.
From "What Are Little Girls Made Of?":
KIRK: What about memory? Tell me about Sam.
KIRK2: George Samuel Kirk, your brother. Only you call him Sam.
KIRK: He saw me off on this mission.
KIRK2: Yes, with his wife and three sons.
KIRK: He said he was being transferred to Earth Colony Two research station.
KIRK2: No, Captain. He said he was continuing his research and that he wanted to be transferred to Earth Colony Two.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top