Exception, not the rule...and still has studio lighting.No, but it COULD be mistaken for a TNG episode:
![]()
Exception, not the rule...and still has studio lighting.No, but it COULD be mistaken for a TNG episode:
![]()
Em... Not really, no.
Yeah, really.
Phillips was going for a "Ming The Merciless" - ie, faux asian - look on Colicos. With no real warning about the script, he had only dark pancake and crepe hair to work with.
Not exactly my point, though. Just saying that the aesthetic for dark/moody bridge lighting isn't without precedent, although it's been achieved in a number of ways.Exception, not the rule...and still has studio lighting.
The idea being contested was "pretty close." I stand by my agreement.Again, no. I don't agree that the Klingons of TOS were "black face." There was no intended parody of race at play. Klingons were to be a mixture of feudal asian and eastern influences. When they brought back Campbell to do Koloth they didn't paint him black. Several of the other Klingons on the show were not darkened. It was not black face.
If so, awesome. Klingon makeup came pretty close to blackface more than once.
Blackface? Seriously?
On TOS, absolutely.
Em... Not really, no.
Well in fairness, look how much things changed fromTOS to Star Trek The Motion Picture. Which has less time separating it (what its supposed to be like 4 or 5 years after Turnabout Intruder), versus this which is supposed to be ten years before??? Where No Man Has Gone Before, Cage, or Corbomite Maneuver (not clear on that).Oh yeah, that sure looks like a "true prequel" to TOS set in the Prime universe - I mean, with those ships and sets and uniforms and that style and - oh yeah, those Klingons - whatever else could it be?![]()
Well in fairness, look how much things changed fromTOS to Star Trek The Motion Picture. Which has less time separating it (what its supposed to be like 4 or 5 years after Turnabout Intruder), versus this which is supposed to be ten years before??? Where No Man Has Gone Before, Cage, or Corbomite Maneuver (not clear on that).
From space ship design, to set design, to costume design, to the design of planets, to the makeup design of existing alien races, prop design. Heck even the acting style and lensing changed dramatically.
Really the only part of Trek that didn't change and change in a dramatic visual manner was the actors, besides the fact that they had aged.
If we original viewers could except that that change represented the same universe, just a few short years later, then I don't see how any one can make a reasoned argument about any visual changes in this.
That's not what "blackface" means, strictly speaking. And Serveaux is correct on this point: they were going for a certain quasi-ethnic look because they were trying to play on (at the time) modern cold-war imagery. Remember historical context for this: Star Trek was hitting the air waves right around the time Vietnam turned into a shooting war, at which point the Chinese and the Viet Cong were considered to be proxies for the Soviet Union.Again, no. I don't agree that the Klingons of TOS were "black face." There was no intended parody of race at play.
They did for Kang and his wife, though.When they brought back Campbell to do Koloth they didn't paint him black.
I think Burnham is at least part Vulcan (or Romulan). Pictures:
![]()
![]()
They didn't seem so at the time. Still doesn't if you think about it: they changed LITERALLY EVERYTHING about the Enterprise, from how the bridge was laid out, the look of the chairs, the look of the consoles, the uniforms, the design of the ship, the shuttlecraft, the phasers, the photon torpedoes, the shape of the viewscreen, and so on. They even gave Scotty a mustache. And that's after just ten years of evolution of set design and real-world technology that inspired it. We're talking about 50+ years of development in set design, science fiction tropes, special effects, AND the technology that inspires all of them.Those changes were minimal compared to this.
Just watched the trailer and my greatest fear is coming to fruition, it looks very NuTrek.
Darth Vader-esque, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
Seems like I'm in the minority here, but I hated that trailer. Scenes look blown out at times, too much lens flare, some of the acting looks bad, the uniforms look bad, the Klingons look terrible to me, I can go on, but man am I disappointed in it. It's really turned me off from this show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.