Wonder Woman was created to make money.
I was wondering who you were referring too, after checking, I see it was rather obvious.
Wonder Woman was created to make money.
Wonder Woman was created to make money.
There is something about bondage too.I thought that Wonder Woman was an attempt to legitimize Bill's aberrant (polygamous) lifestyle, and subliminally advertising the polygraph machine that he had invented?
Am I the only one who is a little perplexed that they are trying to fit the complexity of WWI in the bad guys/good guys trope?
Yes, I know. In any case it's evident that the Americans are the good guys and the Germans/Austrians the bad ones.Do you not know who is the villain?
It'sAres, she's fighting War itself, not just one side of the conflict.
There is something about bondage too.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, I know. In any case it's evident that the Americans are the good guys and the Germans/Austrians the bad ones.
His version of Superman is almost the complete opposite of the comic book version, and a lot of people are disappointed in that. I don't think there's a problem with exploring a darker Superman in general, but it was a mistake to make it the movies' default version.How did Synder "ruin" Superman? By making him a complex individual, instead of a cardboard fictional hero?
Sure some fans, and others are hoping that it can repair the damage done by the earlier movies.I don't think so. Not with fans already anticipating the November release of "Justice League".
.I think Warner Bros. should stop longing for critical approval. They're wasting their time. If they continue to worry about what the critics will say, they'll end up trying to imitate the MCU's house style. And that is the wrong thing to do, in my opinion. Regardless of the bashing, their past three movies had made a good deal of money for them and have attracted a great number of fans. They should really continue doing things their way without worrying about the critics
Well, it's obvious that we can't get all the nuances from a trailer. Let's wait for the movieWell,
David Thewlis plays Ares, and he's on the British side...
Well,
David Thewlis plays Ares, and he's on the British side...
I gather that's just a rumor so far.
Nazis Beware!
![]()
![]()
No. She's had the sword, shield and armor look for decades now. The lasso is just the most famous piece in her arsenal, because it's so unique.Isn't the shield a new thing added by the movies? I don't remember a shield being a part of her usual equipment.
Diana is traditionally linked with WWII, but Marvel beat them to the punch with that just six years ago. I think WWI works just as well with the type of story they seem to be trying to tell, though.Am I the only one who is a little perplexed that they are trying to fit the complexity of WWI in the bad guys/good guys trope? Usually Hollywood preferred WWII stories, because there is more easy to find a good cinematic villain...
As a comics nerd I must point out that Captain Nazi is a Captain Marvel/Shazam villain. Perhaps you mean Baron Blitzkrieg.Captain Nazi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.